Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

AMCanuck

Questionable Moves By Management Are Costing Us Now

54 posts in this topic

I swear all you have to do is look through the first three pages to find the right thread. This is getting right out ridiculous.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't know that Torres and Hodgson would have prevented a Daniel concussion, created an invisible Kesler and Bieksa and caused Edler's game to do a complete 180. Come on man, if we're up 2-0 in the series these threads aren't even thought of. We're down 2-0 because our role players are not playing like our role players.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if we were trying to win the cup now (or very soon) we shouldnt have invested in Kassian, a young, still in need of much development, 21 year-old who wont be ripe until a few years from now. Hodgson would have benefited us greatly in this run with his secondary scoring and sniping abilities. It doesnt make sense that we have given away so much of our future (Shirokov, Tambellini, Hodgson, etc) and then try to pick one up. He has little to no impact in a game, this Kassian guy.

Another big body like Ehrhoff on the back end would have been a phenomenal choice, but it was not ours to have, money took precedence. With him on the line-up, we wouldnt need somebody like Tanev who seems to get run over all the time, or Ballard who is questionable at best... Or worst of all, the Rome & Alberts jokes.

At this point though, I would scratch Edler for a game so he wakes up, let Rome/Alberts play it in his place. I would put in Schneider to mix things up even though i firmly believe Luongo has been our best player, by far. Cause we can always go back to Lu for game 4 in case we lose the 3rd.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't know that Torres and Hodgson would have prevented a Daniel concussion, created an invisible Kesler and Bieksa and caused Edler's game to do a complete 180. Come on man, if we're up 2-0 in the series these threads aren't even thought of. We're down 2-0 because our role players are not playing like our role players.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A few extra years is trivial? I don't think so. You start handing out contracts like that and you set a precedent for the rest of the team and soon you've handcuffed yourself in long-term contracts.

And the Hodgson deal, what would you have wanted? Gillis isn't stupid; when a player asks for a trade, you don't sit on the idea and let it become an issue in the room. And you're not going to get nearly what you probably should for Hodgson if you trade for an older established player as there is always the fear Hodgson will not reach his potential. Cross that off the list, as Gillis would never and should never trade, unless he is able to get full value for a top prospect. So you're left dealing for someone similar to age in Hodgson. Kassian is a top prospect in the league, and probably the best power-forward prospect as well. How is that a bad idea when it's exactly what we need?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

were the hell is the minus options? I like to give people negatives at this point. MIke Gillis has done nothing but great things for this team in 4 seasons. Look at the team record. We've won everything except for a Stanley cup! MIke Gillis is the reason why we are this good.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A few less bobbles, a few less penalties and this thread isn't made.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, at this point I'd agree with that sentiment. I don't think anybody disagrees that we should have re-signed Torres, and perhaps retained that 3rd line the way it was in last year's playoffs (with Lappy and Hansen). That bull-like mentality that Torres had was valuable to us in the playoffs, grinding down the other team's stars (like Thornton's shoulder), and scoring that clutch goal like you said. With that vacancy, we felt we needed to replace Torres with Kassian, who up to this point, has not provided us with what Torres did.

It's a pipe-dream now, and we all liked the trade when it happened, but I admit at this point, it would be nice to re-do that trade. Gragnani is a healthy scratch and Kassian might as well be right now. Hodgson had the 3rd highest points per minute of ice-time on the team and could have been providing some offensive insurance right now, maybe taking Raymond's spot in the top 6.

I was surprised (and disappointed) not to see Raymond traded, and then to see Hodgson leave meant that our top 6 (Burr, Sedins, Kes, Booth, MaRay) would have to get it done on a nightly basis, which they are collectively not doing right now. We felt that we were deep enough offensively, but considering Hodgson's numbers given his ice-time, it now seems like a semi-regrettable decision, as Kassian is understandably not ready to fulfill a top 6 role.

But this is all in retrospect, and I admit at the time of the trade, I was excited to get Kassian (probably because I thought he'd play like Torres!) Like Gillis, I thought that our top-end guys were more than capable, but now it would sure be nice to have Hodgson back. You can't really fault Gillis for a trade that everyone initially liked.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, should have kept Torres, a perfect guy for the playoffs. I was glad Hodgson was traded when his value should have been high, but yes, we should have got someone more playoff ready.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A few extra years is trivial? I don't think so. You start handing out contracts like that and you set a precedent for the rest of the team and soon you've handcuffed yourself in long-term contracts.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you think Kesler is invisible you haven't been watching much.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree OP. I think Gillis has been great for us over the last few years, but this year his decisions have really confused me. The only moves I agreed with at the time were adding Booth and Pahlsson, and even Booth hasn't worked out.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All you guys should be used to disappointment, we've had 42 years of ? Just get used to it, it'll make the healing process much easier every year.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree completly with this breakdown. I was dissapointed to see Raffi go as well as the Hodge.

The fact is we have jumbled up lines who seem confused as to where to be on the ice. I saw so many near collisons between our players, not to mention three guys falling over Lu.

I have faith in this team, I've watched every single game this season and like the OP I have to pay out the nose to get it, but the point is that it's just the lines are jumbled, from what the OP said, not the best foresight in management. Add one injurgy to the star player who happens to compliment another player really well (the Sedin cycle is GONE) and we have a near disastorious situation.

They've pulled through worse.

Teams have over come far worse.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you all are happy. Without the massive uproar for schneider and the complete dis trust in the guy who brought us within a game of the promise land, we would have been able to deal our top prospect and maybe package him up with hodgson to get a real key top 6 forward or top 4 defenceman. If the fans hadnt "neutered" their GM like dumbass PJ stock likes to say, Gillis woulda had the stones to pull the trigger and make a deal with even greater impact.

How stupid is it to have 2 100 chips and not be able to use one every game? That moneys is needed elsewhere. Thoughts?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.