Wetcoaster Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Wasn't random. It was a shot at the OP and others who assume there has to be a scandal instead of waiting for the facts. I find it quite hypocritical, especially when a lot of the same people complain about religious people lacking facts in other discussions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Don't pay enough attention to Catholicism to have much of an opinion on this. However, if in fact the only reason at the end of this is simply because of his age, that is reason enough to step aside. In the same way that the new Pope shouldn't be a 25 year old, I don't think a Pope in his 80s is the best thing for the church either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Oh I thought there were only ever 2 sides, the right side and Heretic's side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetcoaster Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 There are 2 kinds of people in the world - those looking for the worst in everybody and those that don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Realists vs those operating on blind faith. I go with the former. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanford Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Realists vs those operating on blind faith. I go with the former. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladeen Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 I'm speculating here, based on every post you're either replied to me or just referenced me, that maybe, just maybe, you're suffering from some sort of cognitive disorder... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 I have a cognitive disorder? At least I can form sentences people can understand. You just argue with everyone's point of view no matter what it is. You have no opinion of your own other than the opposite of popular opinion. Finally I was making a joke and its obvious to me that you zero sense of humor and that you have something jammed way too far up your rear end. You need to take a break from CDC for your own mental health, but maybe its too late for that. You embody every cynical and negative attribute one could place onto CDC. That is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 There are two different types of CDC Threads. They either turn into: 1. Trade Raymond, Ballard, and a 1st. or 2. Religious posters and Atheist posters who are unable to play nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladeen Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 As far as forming sentences... Should be "Finally, I was making a joke and its obvious to me that you have zero sense of humour"... So tell me, what are your attributes in contributing to the CDC society? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Having trouble caring about which corrupt scumbag is retiring or which one will be replacing him in a disgusting, corrupt organization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inane Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Having trouble caring about which corrupt scumbag is retiring or which one will be replacing him in a disgusting, corrupt organization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetcoaster Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 What happened to innocent until proven guilty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetcoaster Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Seriously. Who cares. Old white guy to be replaced by old white guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetcoaster Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 There's a difference between a realist and complete ignorance, there's been no proof...... innocent until proven guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 That principle applies in a courtroom when facing criminal charges, not the court of public opinion. A common error committed by those unfamiliar with law and legal principles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetcoaster Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Ah...well said. Now what's the difference between "public" opinion and "individual" opinion? As far as the previous line of thought around your comment "Realists vs those operating on blind faith": Are all Realists pessimists? Are all those operating on blind faith optimists? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Realists take a realistic view based on past history and make rational inferences. Those operating on blind faith are ruled by bias. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetcoaster Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 In other words, both have flaws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inane Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 I do not see the flaw in the first approach as it is based upon facts and rational decision making while the second approach is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.