Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Intoewsables

Members
  • Posts

    12,014
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by Intoewsables

  1. Much lower chance of their kill being blocked while taking out a confirmed townie?
  2. Strong chance that one of AV or Porscha is also scum based on lucky's reads.
  3. Obviously they were worried the doctor would save Lewitelli. Why even mention this?
  4. He already dropped a red check for us. He can take the rest of the day off.
  5. I love you vote naslund.is.king Take out TL next round ok ty
  6. This is why I still think you're scum. Okay, bed time. Keep ranting if you want but I probably won't respond unless it's interesting.
  7. You're still conveniently ignoring the existence of TL and pretending Lewitelli was the only counter-wagon. It wasn't town/town, it was town/town/???. What do you think of TL? If you really read through my R2 and felt I was trying to save lucky, I don't know what to tell you other than you're tunneling incredibly hard.
  8. Yeah you've been tunneling hard on me all game. I don't know what that has to do with my read on you and TL from last round. You haven't done much that's noteworthy aside from trying to start a wagon on Lew.
  9. Another interesting post worth scrutinizing IMO. Lots of reads here, which in hindsight probably should've sounded some alarms given how early in the game this was lol.
  10. Going to take a look at lucky's interactions with both players tomorrow to see if anything sticks out. Wouldn't be surprised if one of them is scum.
  11. Hopefully Lew investigated TL instead of wasting it on me. Still think TL/NIK has pretty strong scum team potential based on N1. Also, I think it's safe to say Aladeen was killed for being an active town... unless they were really spooked about his push on TL.
  12. I do not consent to being investigated next round.
  13. TL would be a good choice imo Oh yeah, unvote; vote luckylager. You guys are no fun.
  14. You're probably gonna change your mind on that one soon
  15. I read it to mean that he was indulging you and therefore allowing you to fill the thread with nonsense.
  16. Starting to understand why you thought you were in imminent danger yesterday lmao
  17. I've been playing this game for a long time, and I can't recall a time where a claimed sheriff couldn't get the town to vote for their investigation. Unless you were dropping it a couple minutes before nightfall, I just can't imagine it being an issue. But yeah, I'm gonna drop this since it's a matter of opinion. I just wanted to understand your thought process with claiming so early in the round.
  18. Fair enough. I completely disagree that you wouldn't have enough time to swing the vote to LL later in the round, but whatever, it's your opinion.
  19. I'm not trying to catch you in a "gotcha" moment. I'm genuinely trying to understand why you claimed when you did to help inform my decision for this round. If you're going to be cagey about this, I can't help but assume that you're hiding something.
  20. I don't see anything in here about why you had to claim at the beginning of the round.
×
×
  • Create New...