Pears Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Thread title. They have what we need, (playmaking winger) we have what they need (goaltending). If the right deal ever came along, would either side pull the trigger on it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niloc009 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Kane for Luongo/Schneider? If Kane wasn't such a flaming douche jackarse, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Chicago might. Hell, I'd throw in Jensen or whatever prospect or pick they'd want to make it happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Common sense Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 No way is Schneider going to Chitown, no matter what good is coming back this way. Fans would have Gillis' head on a stick come game 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted April 24, 2012 Author Share Posted April 24, 2012 Kane for Luongo/Schneider? If Kane wasn't such a flaming douche jackarse, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Chicago might. Hell, I'd throw in Jensen or whatever prospect or pick they'd want to make it happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demo250 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 I think you'd have to at least consider it if they somehow were open to the idea of moving Kane. Sometimes you have to make a bold move... hypothetically, both teams get significantly stronger with a trade. Positives: We get a beast player that could help us go to the SCF. Cons: They get a beast goalie that could help them to the SCF. Both teams would have the same pros and cons to consider, so it's not like one team is going to be getting fleeced if they made a deal. I see no chance in hell this happens though, especially since we would probably have to add another piece to the trade on top of a goalie. And also, generally a goalie has a much higher chance to steal a game than a player. So by that logic, trading an elite goalie for an elite player actually gives your opponent the upper hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niloc009 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Kaner for Luo was what I had in mind. Might not happen straight up but with a few extra pieces thrown in it might work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skks_King Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Don't think we'd trade with the Hawks for another 4-6 years. After that, depending on how our rivalry goes..... well anything's possible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kack Zassian Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 If it made the Canucks stronger I would be all for the move. A trade is unlikely, but if we could theoretically move a goalie for a high end d-man or forward why not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.