Zoolander Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 When looking at our need for a big-power forward to play with Kes, one of the names that you might think of is Milan Lucic. Growing up in B.C, and playing for the Giants he might seem like the perfect fit. But the fact is, he wont be moved.....at least not for awhile One guy that I havent seen mentioned a lot here on CDC is someone who shares the same first name. Milan Michalek For those of you who dont know, Michalek is -26yrs old -6ft2,225lbs He is relatively fast and put up 60points (35g,25a) last season with Ottawa. Heres my proposal: To OTT-Booth, VAN 1st rd pick (26th overall) To VAN-Milan Michalek This of course could be tweaked depending on your personal opinion of Booth and Michaleks Value Assuming Luongo is traded to TB for Purcell, and possibly some draft picks. Our top 6 could look like this. These two trades address second line scoring while not affecting too much of the dressing room (besides Luongo) Our top 6 would then be: Sedin-Sedin-Burrows (Sniper,Playmaker, BURRRRRROWS) Michalek-Kesler-Purcell (BIG, power forward, Sniper, Playmaker) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armada Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 I'd do it. (Michalek) Well thought out. Not sure about Luongo trade though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 I'd make that Michalek deal, but Lu wont be going to Tampa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Liszt Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 I guess I'd do it. (Michalek) Well thought out. Not sure about Luongo trade though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 I've just figured you "both" out. And by the way Burrenden, good proposal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangelos Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 booth = michalek and on top of that you want to give them our first? No thank you. I'd rather we stock up on prospects for the future when our team is on the decline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armada Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 booth = michalek and on top of that you want to give them our first? No thank you. I'd rather we stock up on prospects for the future when our team is on the decline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangelos Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 A late 1st round pick (25th overall) is almost worthless, that late you don't know what you're getting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BZRK Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 His injury problems scare me away from him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoolander Posted June 2, 2012 Author Share Posted June 2, 2012 booth = michalek and on top of that you want to give them our first? No thank you. I'd rather we stock up on prospects for the future when our team is on the decline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoolander Posted June 2, 2012 Author Share Posted June 2, 2012 His injury problems scare me away from him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armada Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 That's what the rangers thought back in the day, that they can become a championship team through trades and free agency. Now they've learned that you must build from within. And you cannot be more wrong about the 25th pick being worthless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 I'd do it in a heartbeat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoolander Posted June 2, 2012 Author Share Posted June 2, 2012 I don't wanna win "tomorrow", I wanna win now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangelos Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 Yea, I guess you kinda missed the part where I said its in the eye of the beholder and that it can be tweaked depending on your views of both Booth and Michalek. I for one, think that Michalek is a lot better than Booth. Hes bigger,stronger and can find the back of the net. So I added in the 1st rd pick. But If you think the 1st is unfair, than by all means, that cool too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangelos Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 Ya cause you know late 1st rounders always turn out great. Patrick White turned out pretty well for us eh? Look at the percentage of players who made it to the NHL between the 20th and 30th round and you'll notice there really bad odds. I don't wanna win "tomorrow", I wanna win now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grape Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 booth = michalek and on top of that you want to give them our first? No thank you. I'd rather we stock up on prospects for the future when our team is on the decline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 I don't get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 He's pointing out that you and Armada are the same person. Always posting one after the other, the posts always being a minute apart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armada Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 Well hate to burst your bubble, but what if we don't win now? What if we become the sharks 2.0? We would have traded away 1st rounders for middle aged players and we not only wouldn't have a cup, but we would also be sh*tty in the future too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.