MikeyBoy44 Posted December 15, 2013 Share Posted December 15, 2013 I'm bored so I figured I'd entertain myself with your answers to the following question: How does an NHL look if Burke ran the show? Link to comment
Warhippy Posted December 15, 2013 Share Posted December 15, 2013 TRUCULENNNNNNNNTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In all honesty meh, probably not a whole lot different. For all his stupidity Bettman is making the owners money and reigning in the players. Burke is a better GM than a CEO and in a few instances that is not saying a whole lot Link to comment
timberz21 Posted December 15, 2013 Share Posted December 15, 2013 Bettman is a businessman, zero hockey knowledge Burke is a hockeyguy and a limited businessman. No way Burke gets the NHL a 5.2 billions TV deal. Link to comment
MikeyBoy44 Posted December 16, 2013 Author Share Posted December 16, 2013 I would like to think the rules on ice would be fairly different. I completely agree that the injury rate due to bad hitting has a lot to do with the enforcer role being phased out. He could very well have things running, on ice, smoother than its been in a long time. Link to comment
kodos Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 I'd be down. That being said, I'd be down for Carrot Top over Bettman. Link to comment
MikeyBoy44 Posted December 16, 2013 Author Share Posted December 16, 2013 I'd be down. That being said, I'd be down for Carrot Top over Bettman. Dear god, I couldn't handle the abundant extra props and horrible puns we'd be subjected to for 2.5 hours. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.