Schmautzie
Members-
Posts
441 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Everything posted by Schmautzie
-
Not sure how that could be done. They would have to go without a draft for one season to wait for all the eligible players to turn nineteen. And that missing year would no doubt be the year the Canucks were to draft first overall.
-
I don’t think it will happen until later this week when UFAs start being signed. Hopefully we’ll recoup some picks for the 2022 draft.
-
I’m still hoping that JB can work out a deal with Chicago for Zadorov. Although he shoots left he is comfortable playing the right side. An even up deal for Schmidt would give us the size we need and some cap room. Plus he’d be a Russian comrade for Podkolzin.
-
Bob McKenzies final top 100 draft board
Schmautzie replied to Bertuzzipunch's topic in General Hockey Discussion
All draft experts in hindsight get some right and some wrong. Bob McKenzie had Pettersson ranked only one spot higher than Button at number seven and had even Casey Mittelstadt ranked above him. I’ve been a believer in Button since the 2014 draft, not only with his Virtanen ranking but his take on Brayden Point as well. He had Point rated as a mid first rounder while McKenzie and most others did not have him worthy of a first round selection. Put me in the Svechkov camp if McTavish or the top four D aren’t available. -
So - Who Should The Canucks Take At The Number 9 Spot?
Schmautzie replied to Patel Bure's topic in Canucks Talk
Yeah I just looked it up and he’s committed to the KHL through the 22-23 season. That makes me think MacTavish may be the better pick if available because he may be NHL ready by the start of 2022. -
So - Who Should The Canucks Take At The Number 9 Spot?
Schmautzie replied to Patel Bure's topic in Canucks Talk
I gotta admit I’m now firmly in the Svechkov camp as well for our first round pick if none of the big four defencemen are available. It was already known at the time Podkolzin was drafted that he had committed to the KHL for two years but I haven’t heard anything about Svechkov preferring to go that route. -
[Trade] Canucks Trade for Dickinson from DAL for a 3rd.
Schmautzie replied to aGENT's topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
Not crazy at all. Sutter is just as good defensively and is capable of chipping in some goals. Beagle will score three goals in a good year. -
Magnus Arvedsson?
-
So - Who Should The Canucks Take At The Number 9 Spot?
Schmautzie replied to Patel Bure's topic in Canucks Talk
I believe JB was quoted as saying he would like another Russian on the team and not necessarily on Podkolzin’s line. If so then Nikita Zadorov is a guy I would like him to target in a trade with Chicago. A huge mobile defenceman who loves to hit and is great on the PK. I wonder if the Blackhawks would take Schmidt for him even-up? -
Almost correct. It’s JIM Wiste.
-
So - Who Should The Canucks Take At The Number 9 Spot?
Schmautzie replied to Patel Bure's topic in Canucks Talk
Interesting to note that Craig Button has released his final prospect rankings and the player who made the biggest jump (to #6) was Fedor Svechkov. Since he’s been compared by some scouts to Patrice Bergeron I wonder if he’d be someone JB would consider if he’s still there at #9? -
Benning on Sportsnet 650 with Halford & Brough - June 24, 2021
Schmautzie replied to CRAZY_4_NAZZY's topic in Canucks Talk
Unless we lose him to the Kraken. Hopefully we protect him. -
Totally agree. Unless JB is blown away by a pre-draft offer I really hopes he waits until he sees who’s available at 9OA. It would be a shame to have someone like Edvinsson or Clarke fall to them but to have traded the chance away.
-
Tampa will be in cap hell next season so maybe a defenceman and a forward are in play or a possible trade. If Cernak and Cirelli or Killorn were included I would consider that a fair deal for our 9OA pick. That trade would address our two biggest needs at quality RD and second line LW.
-
So - Who Should The Canucks Take At The Number 9 Spot?
Schmautzie replied to Patel Bure's topic in Canucks Talk
I think he means that like Shinkaruk his skills may not translate to the NHL level. If you read the last line of the linked article about Johnson it states that his skill set and slickness “will become futile against a team or system where space is at a premium”. If the Canucks do draft him hopefully he can become a Brayden Point type of player and prove his doubters wrong. -
Jim Hargreaves.
-
What is the main position target the canucks need
Schmautzie replied to Bertuzzipunch's topic in Canucks Talk
Those types are hard to come by. -
Gotta be Greg Hawgood.
-
[Report] Canucks announce coaching staff updates
Schmautzie replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Canucks Talk
I’d be happier with Guenther than Johnson. He looks like a natural goal scorer who isn’t just a perimeter player. I’d still prefer bigger bodies like McTavish or Clarke if available. -
[Report] Canucks announce coaching staff updates
Schmautzie replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Canucks Talk
You’re right I should’ve said highest floor rather than “can’t miss”. If they get McTavish and he turns into our third line centre I think that’s a win. I’m worried in Kent Johnson we might get another Hunter Shinkaruk type that never makes it in the NHL. -
[Report] Canucks announce coaching staff updates
Schmautzie replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Canucks Talk
I’m hoping Clarke falls to us if McTavish is taken early but I’m probably dreaming.