Biasbieksa Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 No setback Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kesler_smash Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 Lets face it no one will know til tomorrow...AV is so cryptic. If I had to bet I would guess he will not be playing in game1 but good luck getting a decent answer from anyone involved with the Canucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucksnihilist Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 It's obvious that if he comes back for game 1, he is rushing a bit - having just had one practice with team-mates. WHY TAKE A RISK??? Do you want him for game 1 of series 1 then out for the year? Or all of the next 3 (hopefully) series? I say give him 2 weeks since first skate (which would be game 5 or 6) Games are Wed, Fri, Sun, Wed, Sun, Tue, Thu. I would say sit out the first 4 or 5, as the 4th game is sandwiched at the end of a long rest anyways. If we go to 5 or 6, he can help put them away. If we are in trouble he can help right the ship. He is one hit away from being gone for the season right now, AND potentially never being the same player... wait 2 weeks there is no test that will absolutely tell us what is going on in his brain - only thing we know is that rest heals it. so... MG and the canucks aren't stupid enough to start him in game 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kesler_is_clutch Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 what a rip off!! so obviously he is not ready Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fateless Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 It's obvious that if he comes back for game 1, he is rushing a bit - having just had one practice with team-mates. WHY TAKE A RISK??? Do you want him for game 1 of series 1 then out for the year? Or all of the next 3 (hopefully) series? I say give him 2 weeks since first skate (which would be game 5 or 6) Games are Wed, Fri, Sun, Wed, Sun, Tue, Thu. I would say sit out the first 4 or 5, as the 4th game is sandwiched at the end of a long rest anyways. If we go to 5 or 6, he can help put them away. If we are in trouble he can help right the ship. He is one hit away from being gone for the season right now, AND potentially never being the same player... wait 2 weeks there is no test that will absolutely tell us what is going on in his brain - only thing we know is that rest heals it. so... MG and the canucks aren't stupid enough to start him in game 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'NucK™ Posted April 10, 2012 Author Share Posted April 10, 2012 ^ Almost agree completely, however, I think waiting 2 weeks could be too long. Daniel is obviously rushing to be back, but he's obviously healthy enough to play in a full practice. I say we leave him out for game one and two, if we are doing well, let him come back when he is ready. If we lose those games and he says hes ready, let him come back in. No reason to rush him if we're winning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammer4 Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 Love the way AV builds up the suspense as to when our top guys are coming back. You know LA is probably on the edge of their seats like us and it is probably affecting their game mentality! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Money Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 It could be a setback...but he could also be perfectly fine. He wasn't exercising for a couple of weeks, so maybe after a full, all-out practice to test his readiness, he's a bit tired. By skating with the spares, he gets to 1) not wear himself out further the day before the game, 2) avoid unnecessary contact, and 3) mess with the Kings' gameplan. We simply don't know. Making grand statements about what the team and player should or should not do with our limited knowledge is flat-out ridiculous. We'll just have to wait until tomorrow to find out if he'll be playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeria Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 It's obvious that if he comes back for game 1, he is rushing a bit - having just had one practice with team-mates. WHY TAKE A RISK??? Do you want him for game 1 of series 1 then out for the year? Or all of the next 3 (hopefully) series? I say give him 2 weeks since first skate (which would be game 5 or 6) Games are Wed, Fri, Sun, Wed, Sun, Tue, Thu. I would say sit out the first 4 or 5, as the 4th game is sandwiched at the end of a long rest anyways. If we go to 5 or 6, he can help put them away. If we are in trouble he can help right the ship. He is one hit away from being gone for the season right now, AND potentially never being the same player... wait 2 weeks there is no test that will absolutely tell us what is going on in his brain - only thing we know is that rest heals it. so... MG and the canucks aren't stupid enough to start him in game 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehamburglar Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 We're getting better here with everyone feeling better, and just hope Daniel can feel better at least around game 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucksnihilist Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 The talk about gamesmanship is wishful thinking. if he was ready he would be practising with the other players, winning the game means too much to risk anything because of gamesmanship. So... following protocol means what it means: he isn't with the team cause he had a setback of sorts. Saw rumours he had a setback earlier in the process as well (first few days). I didn't want to admit it either, but logically that is all that it means. only chance: if he is completely healthy and they are trying to play mind games. But I don't see it. Chances are he is out at least another 2 weeks... maybe for the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Brahma Bull Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 The talk about gamesmanship is wishful thinking. if he was ready he would be practising with the other players, winning the game means too much to risk anything because of gamesmanship. So... following protocol means what it means: he isn't with the team cause he had a setback of sorts. Saw rumours he had a setback earlier in the process as well (first few days). I didn't want to admit it either, but logically that is all that it means. only chance: if he is completely healthy and they are trying to play mind games. But I don't see it. Chances are he is out at least another 2 weeks... maybe for the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kchengc Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 so what are the lines if we don't have daniel for tomorrow? Burrows - Henrik - Lappiere Booth - Kesler - Raymond Higgins - Pahlsson - Hansen Malhotra - Bitz - Kassian ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franco_sanchez Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 So, this is my first time ever posting.... But I've been seeing a LOT of people saying it's stupid to rush him, he's not ready, etc. I completely agree that it would be stupid to rush him. Then again, I'm sure that management is also very aware of that as well. They understand that they need to take the steps that will allow him to come back safely and permanently. It's kind of pointless for us to bicker as to whether or not he is coming back tomorrow. The organization can make that call a LOT better then we can. If he plays tomorrow? Great. If he plays next series? Great. They will make the right call with one of their star players. I don't believe it's our place to criticize their decision one way or the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesTW Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 what a rip off!! so obviously he is not ready Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{nhl} Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 Kinda odd how NHL.com never has good news on the Canucks posted so quickly, but as soon as there are some question marks about our team, they're all over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesTW Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 Also AV may truly not know if Daniel can play tomorrow, it's up to Daniel and the doctors whether he'll play tomorrow or not. The decision is out of AV's hands. If he had a a setback he wouldn't have skated today at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
binderdonedat Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 So, this is my first time ever posting.... But I've been seeing a LOT of people saying it's stupid to rush him, he's not ready, etc. I completely agree that it would be stupid to rush him. Then again, I'm sure that management is also very aware of that as well. They understand that they need to take the steps that will allow him to come back safely and permanently. It's kind of pointless for us to bicker as to whether or not he is coming back tomorrow. The organization can make that call a LOT better then we can. If he plays tomorrow? Great. If he plays next series? Great. They will make the right call with one of their star players. I don't believe it's our place to criticize their decision one way or the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franco_sanchez Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 You have to be new. Pointless bickering is S.O.P around these parts. You'll get used to it. I did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucksnihilist Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 He's practicing now... so if it is a setback, it isn't a big setback? http://www.theprovince.com/sports/hockey/canucks-hockey/Daniel+Sedin+hits+Canucks+practice+with+Black+Aces/6436629/story.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.