• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CanuckRow

[Rumours/Reports] Official Roberto Luongo Trade Thread (Keep it all here please)

4,357 posts in this topic

Bozak, Kulemin, Franson?

I don't see Toronto having anything we want/need. No thanks to Grabovski.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bozak, Kulemin, Franson?

I don't see Toronto having anything we want/need. No thanks to Grabovski.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bozak, Kulemin, Franson?

I don't see Toronto having anything we want/need. No thanks to Grabovski.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

grabo is the best player toronto has, I doubt he would be offered anyways. no need to worry.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He may be their best player, but that doesn't mean we'd want him.

We don't need another smallish skilled winger, we need a gritty player with some size.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he is very gritty. he plays like he is big and doesn't quit. I think he's the best return we could get from Toronto. they have nothing of great value to offer other than their 1st rounders.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone who doesnt want Bolland is nuts, take the Canuck coloured glasses off people. He is a piece of $hit to play against. Don't think that would hurt the team at all.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding Burrows and his paycut:

He took 2 million for 4 years. That's sacrificing a lot of money. He could have gotten at least 3.5 or even 4 million from another team. For his hard work and dedication. The guy kills penalties also.

Missing out on another 2 million for 4 years? I don't know about you, but letting 4-8 million slide just to stick it with the Canucks and help MG build a team....Burrows is a trooper.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To Vancouver: Tyler Biggs, Cody Franson, 3rd round pick 2013

To Toronto: Luongo , 2nd round pick , Sauve

Would this be a fair deal?

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone who doesnt want Bolland is nuts, take the Canuck coloured glasses off people. He is a piece of $hit to play against. Don't think that would hurt the team at all.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To Vancouver: Tyler Biggs, Cody Franson, 3rd round pick 2013

To Toronto: Luongo , 2nd round pick , Sauve

Would this be a fair deal?

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone who doesnt want Bolland is nuts, take the Canuck coloured glasses off people. He is a piece of $hit to play against. Don't think that would hurt the team at all.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People that don't want him soley because he's a "rat" are blind homers letting their hatred of Blackhawks get in the way of seeing a direct need for their own team. People that don't want him because they think he's not talented and not an effective player simply just don't know hockey.

I don't want him straight up for Luongo but if it was a package including Shaw or another prospect and pick I'd take it

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What team chemistry? There's already rumors of a split locker room next season

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What team chemistry? There's already rumors of a split locker room next season

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People that don't want him soley because he's a "rat" are blind homers letting their hatred of Blackhawks get in the way of seeing a direct need for their own team. People that don't want him because they think he's not talented and not an effective player simply just don't know hockey.

I don't want him straight up for Luongo but if it was a package including Shaw or another prospect and pick I'd take it

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.