Darth Kane Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Hossa's deal is two years older. The cap hit is almost equal and Luongo is just as likely to retire. Luongo is also one of the better goalies in the league. I don't see what you see. Kesler would take over the 2-way forward role you speak of anyways. He did get nominated for the Selke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonMexico Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 <p> We'll have to agree to disagree. Luongo is a great goalie but given that Gillis had to trade him Hossa would be an overpayment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 I would just prefer an interesting deal with established players rather than dangling a semi-desirable carrot and a bunch of fluff for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCNeil Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Could we get Kane? here is my proposal Van. Luongo Raymond Edler 2013 2nd Malhotra Chi. Kane Saad 2nd or 1st in 2013 conditional 6th(If Kane gets more than 30 goals it goes to Chicago if not it goes to the Canucks) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cIutch Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Chicago isn't looking to trade Kane and they are certainly not looking to trade Saad. Saad is the next golden boy in Chicago and Bowman has him penciled into the top 6 already. The have been marketing the heck out of Saad, he even announced out first round pick at this year's draft. Chicago would never do that deal, Kane is the best player (now) in that deal and Saad could be the best player in the long term. I'll give you credit though, it's not a bad deal you put together (it's better than most Chicago/Vancouver deals I've seen). The one piece you missed was a goalie gone back to Vancouver, we'd have to shed some more salary so Crawford would need to go to Vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 good job trying to be nice but it its terrible , its all the pieces that people dont feel fit here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABurrows14 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 I'd have an issue with a guy like Patrick Kane on our team. He's a very talented player but you gotta remember that there are very good reasons why the Hawks might be trying to unload him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 18, 2012 Author Share Posted August 18, 2012 It's still better than most deals I've seen with Luongo going to Chicago. I think some Canucks fans would expect Toews in return for Luongo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 18, 2012 Author Share Posted August 18, 2012 We could also try to get bolland Ballard,Luongo,Kesler and a second for Kane,Bolland,Brandon piiri and a fifth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 We could also try to get bolland Ballard,Luongo,Kesler and a second for Kane,Bolland,Brandon piiri and a fifth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 18, 2012 Author Share Posted August 18, 2012 No Ballard. Ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Please,stop.Kane is an immature drunk and idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 edler? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 18, 2012 Author Share Posted August 18, 2012 No. The only Canucks I'd be interested in are Kesler, Hamhuis and Garrison. If you're looking to trade with Chicago then scratch these players off your list: Toews, Kane, Sharp, Hossa, Bolland, Keith, Seabrook, Shaw, Saad and Teravainen. That being said, Chicago doesn't have anything left to get the 3 players I listed above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 To Chicago: Luongo, Edler, Schroeder To Vancouver: Kane, Hjalmarsson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 To Chicago: Luongo, Edler, Schroeder To Vancouver: Kane, Hjalmarsson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 18, 2012 Author Share Posted August 18, 2012 Luongo, Kesler, Edler for Kane, Hjalmarsson, Frolik, Crawford Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 pretty good could you throw in a 7th for you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 18, 2012 Author Share Posted August 18, 2012 I'll do you one better: Luongo, Kesler, Edler, Hansen For Kane, Hjalmarsson, Frolik, Crawford, Bickell, conditional 6th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyfan90 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 lol @ the idiots trying to get Toews here.....Chicago would not even consider ever trading him for anyone in our roster, not even the sedins! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.