kanucks1 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 So just to let you know,I'm a big Edler fan and I'm against trading him. But I have no problem trading him if he doesn't want to resign or wants 6 million+. Detroit is in big need of Defenceman after trading Brad Stuart and Lidstrom Retiring. So,here it goes. To Det:Edler,Raymond,1st 2013. To Van:Filpulla,Brendan Smith,Franzen Edler=Franzen and Smith. Raymond and a 1st=Filpulla. Lineup Sedin-Sedin-Franzen Booth-Kesler-Burrows Filpulla-Lapierre-Hansen Higgins-Malholtra-Kassian Hamhuis-Bieksa Smith-Garrison Ballard-Tanev Schneider Luongo The only problem that I can think of is that Kassian is on the fourth line. I don't want to trade Hansen but we might have to to give Kass playing time. Maybe...... To Ott: Hansen and Ballard To Van: Mark Stone and Jakub Silfverberg. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 So basically you took Datsyukian Dangle's proposal and just combined it into one. Nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salter Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 You chose to have Lack in the NHL instead of Luogno? Okay. Great idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Neither team would accept. We are seriously underpaying in both deals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksFanMike Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 No to both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thad Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 i wouldnt do the second deal. ive got this feeling stone isnt going to be able to keep up with the nhl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkeeterHansen Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Why does everyone consider Edler to be on the trade block all of a sudden?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferlands_Head Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Detroit wouldn't do this, although they get their defenceman they also lose 2 top 6 forwards and ruin their depth up front not to mention one of their top prospects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferlands_Head Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Neither team would accept. We are seriously underpaying in both deals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schnieds Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Detroit would never accept this deal. You're taking away 53 goals from their team while replacing it with only 21. Where's the Wings offence gonna come from? And nobody (including his own fans) have any interest whatsoever in Raymond. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wheels22 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 This same trade was posted a few days ago. You just tampered with it and made it worse.. Also, trading Hansen is a bad idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Really? I think the canucks would accept, we'd have one of if not the best offense in the entire league if this trade went through. AND we still have the BEST goalie tandem in the league too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.