Nino Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Hank for sure, we would be without our best and only player on the Canucks that can pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CmdrAdama Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 IF Hank could learn to be defensively responsible, (instead of sitting in the penalty box each night) I'd say goodbye, Kes. He's proving to be made of glass, while Hank's our current Iron Man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nino Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 IF Hank could learn to be defensively responsible, (instead of sitting in the penalty box each night) I'd say goodbye, Kes. He's proving to be made of glass, while Hank's our current Iron Man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanIsleNuckFan Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 IF Hank could learn to be defensively responsible, (instead of sitting in the penalty box each night) I'd say goodbye, Kes. He's proving to be made of glass, while Hank's our current Iron Man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kack Zassian Posted March 20, 2013 Author Share Posted March 20, 2013 What's hanks + - this year? Edit: found it... Hank is +16, best on the team Kess is -4 in seven games played (bad start for him) Kass is -7 lowest on the team!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllEyezOnMe Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Lol it would hurt to lose a sedin over kesler just cause keslers injury prone and I don't see him having another dominant season anytime soon. And besides even though sedins are not the same as they used to be you can always count on them, I can't remember lthe last time I counted on kesler to score a clutch goal or set up a play that got us a winning goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nino Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 I hate +/-... worst stat in the world. But regardless Kesler was doing that one a broken foot. Probably affected his ability to backcheck/play strong defensively. Also, using a sample size of 7 games will not give you any sort of relevant stats. What holds more weight regarding defensive play? Keslers Selke, or his -4 in 7 games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring_Back_Bertuzzi Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 i would rather have kesler then henrik it cant get to much worse and at least he can be on the PK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoneypuckOverlord Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 if we lose henrik we will be talking about who we should be drafting in the top 10. That's how badass it is to lose Henrik. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malkin Cookies Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Losing our captain is much worse... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonz Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 It allows you to play the matchup game much more effectively, and also spreads the offense onto 2 seperate lines. (Kesler centering 1 line, Daniel playing the wing on another) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter.S-Kerouac Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 so much worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kack Zassian Posted March 20, 2013 Author Share Posted March 20, 2013 5 on 5 kesler wasn't effective with his line mates in terms of points at all. So this theory is out the door. Hopefully its bc his foot hurt, but everyone plays with injuries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCanuck Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Losing Daniel would be worse than both. We have two elite centers, but only 1 elite winger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksSayEh Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Losing Daniel would be worse than both. We have two elite centers, but only 1 elite winger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmotamed Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 MUCH much worse to lose Henrik!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj vic Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Henrik hands down! No disrespect to Kesler who is a very good player, just that the Sedins are really in class above. It amazes me how little respect they get here in Van. We are so lucky as fans to have the brothers on our team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riviera82 Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Hank. End of story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raiun Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Trick question. Henrik is indestructible, not worried about him. Who knows, maybe if Henrik did somehow get hurt (Maybe Brad Marchand finds some kryptonite somewhere?) Daniel would step up and have his best season ever, like Henrik did when Daniel was out hurt. But we'll never know because Henrik never gets hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bossram Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 In terms of importance to this team, it goes: Henrik, Daniel, Kesler. Losing Kesler is a HUGE blow. But losing Henrik takes from below-average offense to pretty much zero. He is the biggest source of creativity this team has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.