riffraff Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, canuckistani said: Okay. Since you want to dismiss Robb’s opinion as a jet setting non west coaster, as a 18 year west coaster myself, I consider your type to be fear mongering, anti scientific, anti trade tools of the real estate industry who are against the best interests of most bc residents. Fine. Edited July 6, 2019 by riffraff 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckistani Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 Just now, kingofsurrey said: How is a peanut butter Dilbit spill in my local harbour in my best interest ? Explain that to me again... It’s not a valid scientific concern and is pure fearmongering. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofsurrey Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 Just now, canuckistani said: It’s not a valid scientific concern and is pure fearmongering. Yah right... smoking when it started was not a scientific concern.... HOW Did that turn out for us...... LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 “Oil spills are not a scientific concern” -Canuckistani 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 Ya know. I'm fine with BC not getting any % revenue from the pipeline as long as AB and Canada pays for any oil spills clean up (land and ocean) and lost revenue due to the cleanup (ie. Tourism, etc). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckistani Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 13 minutes ago, kingofsurrey said: Yah right... smoking when it started was not a scientific concern.... HOW Did that turn out for us...... LOL False analogy. Shipping dillbit is safe because oil shipping in our waters is safe. People ship oil in worse waters with no disaster. For all of its shipping existence. That is a fact. When something is tried and tested and one of the safest things to do, going what’s gonna happen if it blows up is called fearmongering. Just like against nuclear power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckistani Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 11 minutes ago, riffraff said: “Oil spills are not a scientific concern” -Canuckistani They are not, because it is one of the safest things we do in the world. That’s a fact. People ship oils through worse climate and hydrological conditions than the bc coast and it’s been operating at 100% success rate since gps weather monitoring tech and fog penitrating radar became available in the early 90s. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 (edited) @canuckistani 116000 tonnes of oil were lost at sea to the environment in 2018 Edited July 6, 2019 by riffraff 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 https://www.itopf.org/knowledge-resources/data-statistics/statistics/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckistani Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 1 minute ago, riffraff said: @canuckistani 116000 tonnes of oil were lost at sea to the environment in 2018 Please post the data per yearly, in similar conditions to BC and what the sustainable rate of petrochemical loss to the oceans are, ecologically. The world does not lose 0.75 million barrels of crude per annum via shipping of oil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofsurrey Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 4 minutes ago, riffraff said: @canuckistani 116000 tonnes of oil were lost at sea to the environment in 2018 @canuckistani just got schooled again..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 1 minute ago, canuckistani said: Please post the data per yearly, in similar conditions to BC and what the sustainable rate of petrochemical loss to the oceans are, ecologically. The world does not lose 0.75 million barrels of crude per annum via shipping of oil. Please tell me it’s 100% safe and not a scientific threat again. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckistani Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 Just now, kingofsurrey said: @canuckistani just got schooled again..... Learn to read. It doesn’t change the fact that it’s still one of the most safest industrial practice known to mankind and the numbers quoted are insignificant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 Just now, canuckistani said: Learn to read. It doesn’t change the fact that it’s still one of the most safest industrial practice known to mankind and the numbers quoted are insignificant. It went from “the” safest to “one of the safest” in matter of one post.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckistani Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, riffraff said: Please tell me it’s 100% safe and not a scientific threat again. Red herring. It’s not 100% safe, nothing is, its not required to be 100% safe. To demand 100% safety of any industry is to be anti industry. Maybe we should ban your industry for not being 100% safe. Fearmongering in display won’t get you far for l9nger. Bc is waking up to your types being tools to our real estate industry. Edited July 6, 2019 by canuckistani Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckistani Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 Just now, riffraff said: It went from “the” safest to “one of the safest” in matter of one post.... I said one of the safest. As in top 1% safest industry on the planet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 Half hour later and oil spills are not a scientific threat is still easily one of if not the best statements made in cdc and possibly the internet of all time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 Just now, canuckistani said: Red herring. It’s nit 100% safe, nothing is, its not required to be 100% safe. To demand 100% safety of any industry is to be anti industry. Maybe we should ban your industry for not being 100% safe. Fearmongering in display won’t get you far for l9nger. Bc is waking up to your types being tools to our real estate industry. 9 minutes ago, canuckistani said: They are not, because it is one of the safest things we do in the world. That’s a fact. People ship oils through worse climate and hydrological conditions than the bc coast and it’s been operating at 100% success rate since gps weather monitoring tech and fog penitrating radar became available in the early 90s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckistani Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 1 minute ago, riffraff said:Half hour later and oil spills are not a scientific threat is still easily one of if not the best statements made in cdc and possibly the internet of all time. Its not a scientifically valid concern because it’s ONE OF THE SAFEST INDUSTRIES KNOWN TO MANKIND WITH OONE OF THE GREATEST SUCCESS RATES KNOWN.Those are the facts, fearmongerer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 Just now, canuckistani said: Its not a scientifically valid concern because it’s ONE OF THE SAFEST INDUSTRIES KNOWN TO MANKIND WITH OONE OF THE GREATEST SUCCESS RATES KNOWN.Those are the facts, fearmongerer. So I shouldn’t be concerned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts