Mikebeezy

That’s a tough one. We need to get rid of some wingers and open cap space so I like that. A top 4 rhd who can play physical and possibly be a partner for Hughes, I like that also. But he’s coming off back surgery at 30 years old and still has 7 more seasons under contract. I don’t like this much lol. Oh and he has a full no trade clause that just a few days ago he said he would use to nix any trades, he plans on staying a blue. There’s that to.

It’s not a bad proposal. Too bad Novak wasn’t bigger and a right shot. I guess it comes down to how good you believe Raty will become and was the partial season Novak had a sign of things to come or a one off? We need cap space and the help in the bottom 6 so I would consider it for sure.

Only If you said Braden Schneider instead.

If Canucks don’t pick at 11 tonight here are 3 possible options/proposals. Do you like any of them? Do you have a different proposal for tonight? To Philly 11 OA Lehkermaki To van 7 OA proposal 2 to predators 11 OA Hoglander To Canucks 15 OA Fabro Proposal 3 to rangers 11 OA Round 3 pick 89 Oa lehkermaki to Canucks k’Andre Miller Lafreniere myself I’m hoping to pick the best d man available at 11 but Alvin yesterday said they are not shopping the 11 pick and with his track record of lying I’m expecting us to trade it. If that’s the case I like proposal 2, but I could see Canucks pushing hard for a trade for Lafreniere.

If PLD agrees to an extension with the Canucks before the trade happens I would be ok with it. Lowry would be a great 3c for the Canucks and Dubois is just getting better. But I don’t see it happening. And since it won’t happen I would ask for Dillon also.

I can see how you read it that way.I Probably could of made it more clear.

? Not I if that’s who you are referring to. Been a fan since the beginning. My grandkids are Canucks fans. And not sure why you would think that? Maybe I’m too old not to young.

If the Canucks do use the 11 pick for themselves , who do they pick? The pick likely won’t pay for a few years and our team needs will change by then, even so I don’t think picking a dman or a Center is a bad thing. Possible picks at 11 if michkov or benson slip to 11 I think you grab either one if they don’t slip listed are I think the best options for D reinbacher pellika simashev willander all 4 have top 4 potential just depends on the style of player your looking for but I can see simashev being the Canucks pick at 11 if they go the D man route. For C Dvorsky Leonard Moore all 3 have top 6 potential. I think if Dvorsky is available at 11 and Canucks going with a C this will be their pick. Obviously some of the players will be drafted before Canucks pick at 11 but some of these will be there for sure. Or do Canucks trade down and pick up another pick. If so someone from above might still be available at say 19 pick. And if not you could probably get one of Honzek Yager Wood Danielson Ritchie between these 5 you have middle 6 potential and every team needs good players to play on the third line. Plus you would get a second round pick also. What would you do? Keep or trade the pick? Pick a different player than listed above? My proposal is pick 11 and take one of simashev or Dvorsky.

I’m not overly keen to offer him up but he has some value and you have to add value to a trade to get value back. And with the Canucks bounty of wingers I’m not sure he fits in the plan.

lol I hear ya. Honestly I think hoglander has some value and teams would like to get him. And you have to add something of value for teams to consider trading with you. But garland can be switched out with any contract we are trying to move imo . And I threw rathbone in just because I can’t see us using him and he could use a fresh start somewhere. Maybe take Logan Stanley back in the deal he’s in same spot as rathbone in Winnipeg.

With Winnipeg rumoured to be blowing things up, what do you think of going after Adam Lowry for our 3c spot? I think he would be perfect for the Canucks. Do you think Winnipeg would consider trading him? What do you think the cost would be? Probably many teams bidding if he’s available. to jets 11 oa garland hoglander rathbone to Vancouver 18 oa Lowry Is this even close? 11 pick and hoglander are good pick ups if your rebuilding. Clearing cap from garland is worth something to Canucks and rathbone is a throw in that might get to play in Winnipeg. Canucks get a really good 3c under a good contract plus still pick in first round.

Regardless of the actual return, I really think there is a trade to be had between these two teams. (Ok not regardless) but there is something for both teams to consider.

You could be right but garland doesn’t have value anymore and we need cap space. When your backs are against the wall sometimes you have to lose a trade to gain cap space to move ahead. The ole 1 step back 2 steps forward approach. And I’m only suggesting these trades based on the direction the team wants to go rebuilding on the fly instead of tearing it all down. Not necessarily what I’ve would have done but in the situation we are in I would seriously consider a move similar to this.

Cbj taking on one of our bad contacts is a plus for us. Plus our d coaches can work with him plus he’s just rounding out his game. I feel he’s better than his stats suggest. And Quinn was a minus 24 in 56 games a few years ago. Not suggesting Peeke is Quinn but also not suggesting Quinn had negative trade value either.

I’m in for either garland or Boeser. Take your pick Columbus. And I’ll admit I didn’t look into Peeke plus minus but he was I believe their top minute d man maybe their second but playing on the top pair and just starting to figure out his role.