Great first post! +1.
I agree with the points you made. I'll go a bit further and say that I think Benning and co. drafted Virtanen for the reasons you stated, in addition to him being a local kid. The way they've treated him and advertised him extensively as a big part of our future, in my opinion, has instilled a sense of entitlement in him, and it's unfortunate that this happened. A tour of his place, all the media being fixated on him, coupled with the "sniper" type personality that he has = recipe for potential failure. Any other draft pick with such high status on our team ever get treated like this?
Looking at Ehlers, Nylander, Fabbri, Larkin, Pastrnak.. of course hindsight is 20/20. But when you look at the fact that this is a local kid, and the way things have been going, I'm not really looking forward to JV being a middle 6 F (perhaps a 20G 50P guy) when the reasons for drafting him and overlooking the other options was because he was a local kid. I know it's early to give up on prospects, but I would be absolutely stoked if JB had the courage to trade Gudbranson and Virtanen for Landeskog or Duchene. He won't do it, but that's the type of trade that I would totally be on board with, and feel the organization needs to take it to the next level. Essentially our 2014 1st round (Virtanen + McCann) for a top 3 pick - makes sense to me.