sam13371337

"men grab their sacks" - alex morgan's response to her "tea sipping" taunt against the british. even though the biggest criticism came from the English women. and I don't personally recall an epidemic of male athletes grabbing their sacs and tauning opponents ? (at least not without deserved controversy) every single angry feminists answer to every criticism in life: "its all mens fault, and im the victim" https://sports.yahoo.com/men-grab-sacks-morgan-says-164252627.html

there are already grounds for this in the constitution. inter-provincial projects like the transcontinental railway that basically made Canada a united country. imagine if it were todays politics and some smug politician wanted to block it for his personal political interests? there would be no Canada today (at least not in its current form) its just a matter of having a proper leader who does his job. not a pandering clown who tries to perform gymnastics to satisfy every side (while pissing off everyone) whats the point of having new laws when the current ones are being ignored? Alberta's economy has been in shambles for a few years now as a result of this. in terms of connectivity, culture and now economy. Alberta and Saskatchewan are a lot more aligned to the US then they are to Canada. I seriously believe another term of truduea and this insane separatist sentiment will start translating to a serious political movement. besides handing out equalization payments to the east, and getting their economy delibaritly sabotaged. alberta and Saskatchewan are getting nothing in terms of benefits from this one sided union.

this smug selfish attitude we see among some leftist BC folks is the reason why people are soo divided. everyone just wants to look after their own personal interests at the expense of others. its really easy to sit in BC, all comfortable and mighty and lecture people whos entire livelihood, life and self worth depends on a certain industry. IMagine a infuriating it is to get lectured from a smug BC or Ontario urban dweller lecturing people who are losing everything to think about trees and the polar bears. alberta is literally giving away its oil at prices of 10-20$ a barrel because its fellow "Canadian" provinces blockade it for their own (mostly) political intersts. this not only goes against the constitution of Canada. but it creates unbelievable resentment and division. ALberta and Saskatchewan would be far better off seceding from Canada and joining the US. let Quebec go their own way and BC and Ontario and maybe a few atlantic provinces can have their own version of virtue signalling, holier than thou Canada. and lecture each other till the next century.

trudeau like his failure of father. will lead to the disintegaration of Canada as a country if he remains in power for much longer. a weak, pathetic, pandering idiot. Who manages to piss of every side, and thanks to him western separatism is thru the roof in western prairie provinces. truduea and the liberals are literally telling the west to shut up, and accept economic slavery/serfdom. He tried to pander to natives by laughably claiming a genocide. The natives don't like him. he tried to pander to Quebec. Quebec is sick and tired of open border economic migrants flooding in to use up social resources and change the cultural make up of the province (an extremely sensitive thing for francophones) he has failed on every front. a weak pathetic laughing stock who nobody takes seriously. Canada is a large country. with competing economic interests between the provinces. Our forefather who were much smarter then feminist truduea and his daddy. put into the constitution that major economic projects like pipelines are the domains of the federal government not the provinces. for this very reason. Trudeau is living proof of this very famous quote by sun Tzu: "those who try to defend everything, end up defending nothing"

"democracy" in geopolitics is basically "US approved government" when you begin to understand this reality, is when everything in the world starts to make sense.. virtually no country has "democracy" all countries have various ways of giving some power or the illusion of power to people, Just because your allowed to go put a vote in a ballot box doesn't really mean you have any control over your government. Its just an illusion. the best description ive seen of modern pre-trump western politics is a WWE fight. where they are literally acting like they are enemies, while they both are serving the exact same interests. its virtually the exact same dominant interest groups that buy off the "mainstream left/right" politicians and dominate government decision making. they each have such gaping flaws and holes in them you can drive a semi-truck sized interest group into them. Some lobbyist are so strong. like the pharmecautical companies in the US. that they have bought off politicians and media (fox news) to actually brainswash simple minded americans into believing that a for profit based insurance industry, whos sole purpose is to deny you care to maximize its own profit. and keep 10s of millions of "undesirables" out of insurance coverage. They have literally brainswashed a section of the population into beliving this is good for them. this is 1 example of a single parasitic interest group actively undermining peoples interests with open corruption. the only country on earth that comes close to being an actual "democracy" is Switzerland. one of the few or only countries on earth that the people have actual power over their government decisions.

burn your way to democracy and freedom! I wonder how the media would treat heros who torch government buildings if it was happening in their own house? Would you be able to lead a mob and break into the white house or congress to protest? wouldn't you get shot and be labelled a terrorist?

you obviously seem to have some sort of anti-china vendetta. I personally have no dog in this fight but I call out bull$&!# when I see bull$&!#. and this is 100% bull$&!#. Hong kong is soverign Chinese territory. china has actually give hong kong enormous autonomy not enjoyed by any other region. eventually though the plan was always going to be full re-integeration with the mainland. China pronlonged this to make it a soft transition. the british have as much legal authority over hong kong as Botswana (exactly 0). they have no right to meddle. period. There is nothing legal in any capacity to support this. those 2 states you cited were extremely weak states that tried but simply couldn't hold on to them by force. they both accepted the loss. Kosovo is a far more relevant example and precedent setter. where a foreign entity went in. split a state up into many pieces and carved out an artificial state of "kososvo" out of soverign Serbian lands. Serbia has never recognized this, despite their current government being HEAVILY dependent on the same countries that took it from them. (it simply politicial suicide for any politician to even think about it) Russia cited this as the reason their Crimean annexation is legal. Kosovo is far more relevant then sudan or east timor. and If you think in practical terms china is on the same level as sudan and east timor…. then you are delusional. LOL a weak failed state not being able to hold on to sessionist territory despite trying. Has 0 relevance to the hong kong situation. they accepted their defeat and recognized it. superpower china is not going to let tiny hong kong and a bunch of stupid stundents strip away internationally recognized Chinese territory. despite whatever wishful thinking fantasy you may have. these dead enders are nothing but stooges of foreign intel agencies and propaganda media. playing a very old and tired game.

it wasn't a pure coincidence that the guy got to keep his crown (unlike every other defeated government in ww2 that got decapitated) Japan was completetly defeated and was facing a soviet invasion from the north. The guy knew his country faced complete anahilation and occupation by a soviet/American army. and a brutal death and end to to monarchy. he also had fanatical military officers who didn't even have the word "surrender" in their vocabulary and were ready to coup the emperor out of power and fight to death regardless. he made a deal that basically gave japan up in its entirety to the US. this kept him in power, put down the generals who woudlve killed him, and saved his country from soviet invasion. this nuclear bomb was a simple face saving excuse. Tokyo firebombings by conventional aircraft killed more in a single night then the atom bombs put together.

we can go around circle all day if you want. but legally speaking there is no such thing as a "right of cessation" in the UN. The UN makes it perfectly clear what national soverign rights a country has over its terrirtory. there is nothing in the UN or international law that states that a separatist movement has the right of sessation. those 2 states you mentioned were simply to weak to do anything about it . and they cut their losses and let the territories go after failed attempts of keeping them by force. china is not going to give up its UN recognized territory (and historically Chinese as well) because there are some pro-british colonized hong kongers west western sounding names who have been indoctrinated in the "democracy" propaganda charades we see .. where someone like putin who nobody serious can dispute his overwhelming popularity among the Russian populace. who turned Russia from a near failed bankrupt state into a world power again. hes a "dictator" but the ridiculous crap we see in parliamentary "democracies" like the british tory party with very little legitimacy being able to hand pick the new PM among themselves behind closed doors without consulting the population. these things are democracy..... trump running the white house like a family business. with open nepotism is democracy.. but god forbid a geopolitical enemy does that. this propaganda charade doesn't work anymore outside indoctrinated people in the west. it gets laughed out outside the western bubble. that's why these hong kong dead enders will only end up destroying hong kongs economy and getting themselves crushed in the service of foreign intel agencies …….

The UN Charter is very very clear on national sovereignty. there is no provision for magicall "oppression" one of the biggest factors that destabilized countries and led to endless wars and eventually ww2 were territorial disputes. that's why the winners of the war, hammered into the UN charter the rights of sovereignty for states. This completely makes right of conquest illegal. basically the winners of the world set up a system where they got to keep their gains. The status quo benefits them ... one of the biggest upsetters of this balance was Kosovo. when western states wanted to destroy the last non-nato outpost in Europe (Yugoslavia) and used this issue to completely decapitate pro-Russian Yugoslavia. Russia used this precedent to claim its annexation of crimea to be legal. this is an extremely dangerous precedent that can be used by any country to support separatists of an enemy state. That's why the UN charter is VERY CLEAR on national sovereignty of countries. if you eliminate that, we will go back to the law of the jungle where might makes right. (if were not there already)

im just a very geopolitically literate person. I find it almost insulting that politicians don't speak real world geopolitics with their own populace. they peddle ridiculous and selective "democracy" and "human rights" on geopolitical enemies. Why they are best allies with the kinds of Saudi arabia and sell them state of the art weaponry that's contributing to a real famine and possible genocide on one of the poorest people on earth (yemen) I would be much happier if they came out honestly and said. "this is an ally we must support, because their dirty petro-dollars support weapons industry jobs" when they go into this mystical fantasy democracy land. I find it an insult to my intelligence. just because 99% of the population is geopolitically illiterate and their sources of info comes from a handful of major corporate "mainstream media" who have the EXACT same foreign policy regardless of being left or right. Just look at MSNB and FOX. there is nothing on earth they agree on. except foreign policy. they are both wholeheartedly support the US government foreign policy. they both equally support war. they both equally support regime change. They both equally find china evil. etc etc.etc…. I really REALLY resent this. western people are the most heavily indoctrinated on earth. I say this as someone who has travelled EXTENSIVELY. book smart, but very street dumb

The UN charter is very clear on soverign territory. You might want to look up hong kong sovereignty. hong kong belongs to the Chinese state, and the Chinese people. By legal definition, and by the more important measure (power) . Hong kong only temporarily was taken out of Chinese hands at a time of british imperialism. where Britain thought they owned the whole world. and ruthlessly exploited all other "lesser" people to enrich Britain. this is a scar that is still very painful and fresh in the minds of the Chinese and many other nations. The entire Chinese national identity has been based upon the rectification of western humiliation of Chinese people. Where the communist took china out of enslavement and mqde them a world power "China is a sleeping giant, let her sleep for when she wakes, she will shake the whole world" - Napolean China is awake now. and its not going to get humiliated by a former british colony on Chinese soil.

your naïve kind are being used by cynical geoplotical actors for their own interests. you are a naïve fool if you really believe that anybody has hong kong peoples interest in heart. This looks eerily similar to the old regime change playbook western intelligence agencies have been playing all over the world . its the exact same play book. Support some anti-government group. goad them into attacking state and government property with full support. wait for the state to respond. And scream bloody murder!! genocide!!! democracy!!! this used to be a very effective playbook. It regime changed a lot of ex.soviet states. it has been tried with varying success in the middle east. the western governments didn't invent propaganda. they are just the best at it,. the rest of the world is starting to catch up unfortunately . this regime change game doesn't work as well as it used to. Iran crushed their "green revolution" Syria is about to crush its "revolution" and Ukraine has been decapitated as a country after western states decided to coup the elected president out of office. other countries are not stupid. they are onto this game. its not even working in Venezuela anymore. if these bunch of idiot studends think they are going to storm into the parliament building. and some white knight british army is going to come and save them. or the Chinese communist party will wave the white flag... they are sorely mistaken cynical intelligence agents will try to exploit their stupidity to destabalize china/hong kong. while the Chinese security services will see right thru this and eventually crush them like ants. and it might not be a tank display that western media would love. It might be just sitting back ,and letting these trouble makers make life miserable for the average hong konger. make them lose their legitimacy then move in ruthlessly on the leaders. The only thing they might achieve is destroying the economic prosperity of hong kong. Hong kong belongs to china. it will join china fully. this is a 100% certainty.

captain America. im afraid your as wrong as both sides. there is the USA #1 propaganda side which you peddle. Then there is a genocide dead baby claim of the other side. Its all about FUEL FUEL and... FUEL . the biggest weakness of japan was its resource poor status that prevented its growth. US imposed an embargo on the Japanese that gave the Japanese 2 options. Surrender, or attack. this was a cold calculation by an American government that wanted to enter ww2, but faced an isolationist population that was dead set against it. Now fast forward to 1945. germany has been completely decapitated as a nation. The Japanese are now all alone facing notonly the entire wrath of the allies. but an expiring non-aggression pact with the soviet union. now the soviet union attacks from the north. They have no navy left. They are getting pummelled on a daily basis with hundreds of thousands of casualties. their very last refinery was bombed several weeks before their surrender. Which literally meant the entire Japanese army would be walking in days or weeks. They had nothing left to fight with. they were completely defeated physicaly and psychologically. nukes had 0 impact on them surrendering. Nukes were a super weapon the US wanted to demonstate to the soviet union. the Tokyo firebombings by us bombers killed over 100K civilians (more then both atom bombs put together) The second bomb was dropped almost before the Japanese could get the inevitable surrender in. this whole concept of "nuking to save 10 million lives" is the most ridiculous bull$&!# ive ever heard regarding this war. now the other side that virtue signals can stfu as well. Japan started the war. it was an all out total war for survival. They knew what the stakes and consequences were. The US had every right to go in there and pummel them into the stone age, Completey eradicate their militaristic culture, and turn them into permenant vassals. the only thing you could argue the US shouldn't have done was the mass rapes post surrender. there is simply no excuse for that kind of savagery after the enemy has surrendered.

its best not to shoot the messenger. im not saying that this is ok or this is how society should work. Im trying to explain reality. Looks matter in life whether anybody wants to believe that or not. its not the end all to everything. but it can help you massively in life. Melania trump wouldn't have score a billionaire husband if she looked like rosie o donnel. no matter how nice of a person she is. and this isn't about inside our outside beauty. I comepletely agree with you that inside beauty is more important. But reality is, society worships attractive people. Society treat differently an "ugly" or "fat" person from a conventionally "Attractive" person. that's just reality. that's human nature. you may not like it, but its the truth. the worse thing someone can do is to delude themselves otherwise. and give off a bad message to kids that its ok to look like tess holiday. you don't need to have any self control, discipline or anything. just let yourself go and demand society changes itself to suit you. sending off kids into world like this sets them up for shocking failure 99% of the time. once again attack a person character instead of their words. it really doesn't matter my own personal perefence. im making a comment on modern society. If your actually interested in my own personal preference. im actually an old school type of person who strongly believes in loyalty and "death do you part" you need to respect your partner and the institution of marriage. nobody forced you to get married, but once you make that commitment you need to honor it. I would never in a million years divorce someone if they got burned..... or something.

this actually has a lot to do with motivation. you actually have to work hard to become attractive (for the most part) any ugly woman/person can instantly turn themselves into a knockout by seriously going to the gym and working hard to get that toned gym body. While any attractive person can let themselves go, not take ccare of themslevs or their health and rapidly lose their natural beauty. the person who actually goes thru the hardwork generally has more discipline and is more intelligent. that's why they usually (but not always) go hand in hand. the most pathetic new social movement we see is ugly women (and its exclusive to women since we don't hear any men complaining) demanding that society (and you) find them attractive. regardless of what your natural biology is telling you. if you don't find some morbidly obese woman as attractive Jessica fox. You are a sexist pig. if you have any sort of preference in women (big boobs, big butt, beautfil eyes etcetc… ) you are also a sexist pig. all women are beautiful regardless and men have no right to discriminate. male sexuality and preference = sexism.

and dude you sound like a pathetic wannabe white knight. your a Nazi, alt-right, incel, mysoginistic women hater, etc.etc... usually when someone tries to refute liberal nonsense, the usualy modus operandi is to ridicule and attacks on that persons character. where as this used to be an effective method, its become pathetically ineffective. I suggest you change your tactics, stop the pathetic white knighting and stop trying to score browny suck up points with the loud left... I can assure you if you have personaly insecurities you are lashing out about, that most women find assertive and confident men a lot more attractive then the soyboy truduea feminist image that liberalism has projected as the "ideal man" . and no..... being assertive and confident is not you being a women hating. women beating, angry racist or whatever other label liberal propaganda paints you with.

your saying neither smollet or spacey tried to use the gay card to shield themselves from criticism? now ask yourself why they would do that, if they didn't realize how much currency it has in this gender identity politics liberal politically correct utopia we live in?

I think you are mistaking liberalism as an economic concept. While putin is talking about it as a social aspect. in economic terms I agree with you. Billionaires shouldn't be getting tax cuts. but that's a completely different topic. one of the reasons why these crony capitalists make such inroads with the average joe is exactly due to the incompetence (or even social cynicism) of the liberals when it comes to many social issues. They feed off that, and with Trumpism have now found the perfect formula to completely bury liberalism.

milo yano~ said it best.. he said im gay and part of a "protected class" I can LITERALLY murder someone on live tv and get away with it. we even saw this act pathetically being played by jussie smollet and the pedophile rapist kevin spacy. both trying to use their sexuality to shield them against their crime. I also love how none of the liberals refute putins words. but just parrot the left wing media's propaganda against him. hes some funny KGB guy and everything he sais is a joke. the man is the most intelligent high IQ world leader on earth.

well I did say faux outrage... though you personally probably don't fall under this category. my point regarding society is still valid. the fact that you thought this would be controversial is a sign of the times.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/russias-vladimir-putin-says-liberalism-has-outlived-its-purpose/ar-AADyh7P?ocid=spartanntp wise words from a very wise man .. if "western" world leaders dont wake up from this collective mindset they have of throwing their own citizens under the bus for various interests to get them elected. were going to see more and more trumps. Trump was a backlash to this, and its only the begining.

why is it becoming politically incorrect to comment on a womans look? its completely ok to comment on mens looks, but society seems to be going in a direction where its becoming taboo to comment on womens look your faux outrage title/thread seems to validate this point in my opinion. This is the new feminist wave. Where morbidly obese women get put on beauty magazines because its no longer politically correct to find certain women more attractive then others. male sexuality is becoming a sin in this new wave of liberalism we see.

so nobody is talking about our glorious feminist leaders plastic fork pizza party? environmentalism seems to only be important when they need to shove taxes down your throat for these hypocrite parasites it seems. at least better then Al Gore. living in a mansion that uses 14 times the energy of an average house while flying all over the place in private jets lecturing and preaching to us evil-doers about how we are destroying the planet. just sickening how stupid people can be to buy this crap.

when a monopolistic company takes over an industry. their "argument" has always been "people don't have to buy our products" this 'argument' has always been rejected by rule of law. business common sense, and thousands of years of experience and history with monopolies. google didn't have to buy youtube. Why did it? youtube grew on the backs of indie creators not big corporate tech. no other industry on earth allows this sort of monopolistic practices. google is now a partisan platform of the left, pretending to be a neutral platform. enjoying the legal privilidges of a neutral platform. and escaping anti-trust legislation that every other company on earth adheres to. this is ridiculous and it has to end now. nobody needs a bunch of techy geeks in san fransisco to become to worlds thought police they are now openly plotting to use their massive power and dominance over the internet to manipulate elections. if this isn't an assault on democracy, I don't know what is.