alexkidd Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 After Daniel came back we were pretty even with the Kings. If Daniel was back for game one it probably would have been a 7 game series. Now that the Kings have swept the Blues I feel better about the Canucks. Kings are on a tear and are proving to be way better than everyone thought. Next season should be good for us. Rested and ready for revenge! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexkidd Posted May 7, 2012 Author Share Posted May 7, 2012 Delete me please, I see another similar topic now.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 After Daniel came back we were pretty even with the Kings. If Daniel was back for game one it probably would have been a 7 game series. Now that the Kings have swept the Blues I feel better about the Canucks. Kings are on a tear and are proving to be way better than everyone thought. Next season should be good for us. Rested and ready for revenge! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 No. We were bad. I'm sorry. Two shorthanded goals?! Wtf! Edlers "play", our pp, our pk. We were bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyfan90 Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 ok so what if simong gagne came back for LA? Just saying there's always injury and can't use it as excuses even though sedin > gagne he is still a top 6 forward that would've made their team even better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicocanuck Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 LA is playing really hard and with a lot of confidence. You gotta give them credit, but the Canucks still underachieved. Having Daniel around for the whole series would've helped, but the team never looked in sync. Too many mental errors and not enough effort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollumpus Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 No, the Canucks were that bad. regards, G. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucktican Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 No. We were bad. I'm sorry. Two shorthanded goals?! Wtf! Edlers "play", our pp, our pk. We were bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Magician Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 No. We were bad. I'm sorry. Two shorthanded goals?! Wtf! Edlers "play", our pp, our pk. We were bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rounoush Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 LA is playing really hard and with a lot of confidence. You gotta give them credit, but the Canucks still underachieved. Having Daniel around for the whole series would've helped, but the team never looked in sync. Too many mental errors and not enough effort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vansicle Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 It was never an issue of being "that bad". President's Trophy, remember. It is/was a question of being the best. That's what you have to be to win it all. Are we really giving ourselves the chance to be the best with all of the pieces we have? I think we're only a few pieces away: 1) coaching staff (possibly in the works); 2)starting goalie (almost certainly in the works);3)all-star d man (a trade of #2 could bring this back); 4)all-star power forward/sniper/playmaker (a trade of #2 could bring this back, too). Put those pieces in place, and we are the best. I know it seems like "Oh, all we need is a new coach, trade Luongo and get Kopitarz and Duncan Keith? Why didn't you say so?", but it's not as much of a pipe dream as it looks, and those pieces are all within grasp. We just need MG to have the balls to make the moves/difficult decisions. Tomorrow could bring a lot of answers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papayas Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 No. We were bad. I'm sorry. Two shorthanded goals?! Wtf! Edlers "play", our pp, our pk. We were bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gran Turismo Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 I hope it's not as bad as your grammar or logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Templeton Peck Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.