Alflives Posted April 22, 2023 Share Posted April 22, 2023 9 minutes ago, hammertime said: Garland is a good player puts up 50pts 5v5 from the 3rd line and puts you on the power play a lot. Just because he's not getting you a #2 D. Doesn't mean he's trash Garland is an okay player. I’d be ecstatic if we can trade him straight up for a right shot, defensive 3C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted April 22, 2023 Share Posted April 22, 2023 1 minute ago, Alflives said: Garland is an okay player. I’d be ecstatic if we can trade him straight up for a right shot, defensive 3C. That could be reasonable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KKnight Posted April 24, 2023 Author Share Posted April 24, 2023 On 4/21/2023 at 7:56 PM, hammertime said: No amount of Garland gets you Peeke he's a top 20 RHD in the league making 2.75m Top 20 RHD? Hamilton, Carlson, Hronek, Seider, Marino, Bouchard, Letang, Cernak, Doughty, Karlsson, Makar, Dobson, Pulock, Fox, Montour, B.Burns, Pesce, Durzi, Pietrangelo, McAvoy, R.Andersson, C.Tanev, Ekblad, S.Jones, J.Spurgeon, A.Larsson, Klingberg, N.Pionk, J.Petry, J.Trouba, M.Weegar, J.Faulk, C.Parayko, L.Schenn That's 34 RHD that I think have more value Peeke. Don't get me wrong I think Peeke has good potential, but Peeke was a -41 and had 13 points on a bad Columbus team. They have Jiricek waiting in the wings, as well as Ceuleumans. Which is why I could see them entertaining the idea of trading him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now