Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

canuck2xtreme

CDCGML 2011-12 Season

13,432 posts in this topic

New Jersey Devils Updated Team Scoring

152 Duncan Keith

145 John Carlson

138 Corey Perry

126 Anze Kopitar

115 Jonas Hiller

109 Niklas Kronwall

100 Rich Peverley

096 Brooks Laich

095 Marc-Andre Gragnani

090 Joe Corvo

088 Karl Alzner

085 James van Riemsdyk

081 Marcus Johansson

074 Arron Asham

068 Bobby Ryan

057 Ville Leino

050 Jeff Halpern

037 Michal Neuvirth

035 Nate Thompson

029 Raphael Diaz

024 Ben Lovejoy

022 Cory Emmerton

022 Carl Hagelin

022 Alec Martinez

015 Craig Adams

012 Alexander Ovechkin

011 Marc-Andre Bourdon

006 Tyler Ennis

005 Maxime Talbot

000 Deryk Engelland

000 Dustin Jeffrey

000 Gustav Nyquist

000 Eric Tangradi

* Updated before games 12 / 10 / 11

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Blues tonight...

Michalek 0

Winchester 0

Neil 2 PIM = 2 PTS

Karlsson 0

Szczechura +1 = 2 PTS

Thomas 0

Staois +1 = 2 PTS

Erat 1 PPA = 4 PTS

Klein 1 A +1 = 7 PTS

Legwand 0

Wellman 0

Iginla 2 G 2 PIM +2 = 12 PTS (he´ll get the player of the week award)

Butler +2 = 4 PTS

Morrow 0

Prosser scratch

33 Points ...not really good

Greene injured

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We are NOT happy with the play of our team this last week. Sources say that Tuomu Ruutu, Ian Cole, and others could be available for a legitimite top flight LW.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Waivers/Recall:

The Montreal Canadiens have placed F Jeff Taffe on waivers, with the intention to assign him to North Dakota once he clears.

In his place, the Habs have recalled D Keaton Ellerby from the Fighting Sioux.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are putting the cart before the horse saying that Bobrovsky has taken the number one job from Bryzgalov. They trusted Bobrovsky enough after last season that they changed their entire team to bring in Bryzgalov. I think it is safe to say that come crunch time, Bryzgalov will be the go to guy. Or, at the very least, a 3rd of the season would not be soon enough to give up on him as their starter.

A bit of wishful thinking in San Jose there partner.

And leaving a game with an injury is not even remotely close to the same thing as being pulled because the other guy is better or because you suck......just saying. So your potato comment just comes across as ill informed.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It came across that way because I wasn't talking about nor did i have any awareness of last nights situation. I was talking Macro, not Micro...I never said Bob has taken his job, I am saying the job is Bryzgalov's to lose, and so far this year, other than being the higher paid guy, there is nothing else in Bryz's favor as to why he is the starter. Bobrovsky is making a huge case for himself to be the starter, so therefore it really is up to Bryz to fight for his role, isn't it?

I guess i used the wrong language, since he was injured...but in a macro sense, it really adds into the equation...twice injured in 20ish ish games..'fragile' tag is not far off. The trick is to think broad general strokes...not spur of the moment real time reactionary ones. I think then, my comments make sense. Or maybe not...i was drinking wine. :P

I read this and thought Starcraft :P

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It came across that way because I wasn't talking about nor did i have any awareness of last nights situation. I was talking Macro, not Micro...I never said Bob has taken his job, I am saying the job is Bryzgalov's to lose, and so far this year, other than being the higher paid guy, there is nothing else in Bryz's favor as to why he is the starter. Bobrovsky is making a huge case for himself to be the starter, so therefore it really is up to Bryz to fight for his role, isn't it?

I guess i used the wrong language, since he was injured...but in a macro sense, it really adds into the equation...twice injured in 20ish ish games..'fragile' tag is not far off. The trick is to think broad general strokes...not spur of the moment real time reactionary ones. I think then, my comments make sense. Or maybe not...i was drinking wine. :P

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wallstreetamigo, I am not really looking for a fight here. Your probably right, I just don't know why the antagonistic approach. lol. Its all good..your taking too much from a post I made on a saturday night after a bottle of wine.

And again, i didn't say he was fragile, just like i didn't say he lost his starter job. I said he has been injured twice in 20 games...if that is a trend, an injury every ten starts..he will start to get a fragile tag...big difference between what i wrote and what you thought you read. Chill man, peace. :D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wallstreetamigo, I am not really looking for a fight here. Your probably right, I just don't know why the antagonistic approach. lol. Its all good..your taking too much from a post I made on a saturday night after a bottle of wine.

And again, i didn't say he was fragile, just like i didn't say he lost his starter job. I said he has been injured twice in 20 games...if that is a trend, an injury every ten starts..he will start to get a fragile tag...big difference between what i wrote and what you thought you read. Chill man, peace. :D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who's fighting? I'm just discussing the situation is all. Pointing out that I think your opinion is unsubstantiated by the facts is not me being antagonistic in my way of thinking. Of course, it may well be in your view that is what I am doing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah bro, you just did the same thing twice: you took something i said, "This could happen" and made it out as though I said "This Happened", and then went on to discredit why I was wrong. That is what made it antagonistic. My theory of what could happen may well be wrong, but making it out that i think it already has is not correct either.

Anywho...no worries here. Its gonna be a slow couple days though, lol only a few games tonight and just one tomorrow.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Semantics. The way you word things is that your opinion is right and a foregone conclusion. THAT is antagonistic when you are talking about another team's goalie and the actual facts and stats don't support that opinion.

People disagreeing with you is not a personal antagonistic attack on you, you know. I do apologize if you took it that way.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries. I didn't think your comments were so much trying to be negative about Bryzgalov as they were trying to be positive about Bobrovsky.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys guys.... no need to fight.

They both suck. :P

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm starting to feel a little antagonistic....who can I antagonize? B)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.