Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

* * * * * 1 votes

Please Fire The Power Play Coach!

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
40 replies to this topic

#31 shazzam


    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,416 posts
  • Joined: 26-July 07

Posted 13 April 2012 - 10:25 PM

They obviously studied our PP and cracked it. Its time for adjustments, and its their job. Failure to do so will have consequences.

To be fair, we are missing Daniel on the first unit. Also Ehrhoff from last year, who was really our top D on PP. The 2nd unit is missing Hodgson, who was the QB.

#32 250Integra


    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,128 posts
  • Joined: 07-March 06

Posted 13 April 2012 - 10:26 PM

Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Drop pass
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
Thanks for the Memories Canada!!!
Thanks for everything Naslund!
Original creator of the WWE and the Rate my sig / Showoff thread

#33 DownUndaCanuck


    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,223 posts
  • Joined: 28-July 07

Posted 13 April 2012 - 10:29 PM

We lost a lot of skill on our PP when you get rid of Hodgson and Daniel Sedin. I mean seriously, Raymond and Ebbett on the PP? That's two 10-goal scorers.

Here's what I want to see:

Kesler - Henrik - Higgins
Edler - Salo

Set up the Salo slapshot with Higgins and Kesler in front of the net, Higgins looking for the occasional tip.

Burrows - Booth - Raymond
Ballard - Hamhuis
Posted Image

#34 HorseGem2007


    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 476 posts
  • Joined: 12-February 12

Posted 13 April 2012 - 10:32 PM



as your forwards on the 1st PP unit?

This isn't NHL calibre coaching. Our far and away best 2 centres are on the same freaking PP line along with Mason "can't play" Raymond.

What Stanley Cup favourite would have Andrew Ebbett centering the 2nd PP unit?

^^^ this
and I cannot understand WHY Raymond & Ebbett are doing on the PP unit ?!?!?!?
totally puzzles me !!!!!!!!!!

GO :canucks: GO .... Be Proud .... Be Loud
:emot-parrot: :emot-parrot: 16 Wins to Go :emot-parrot: :emot-parrot:
" OnceUgotItUpKeepItUp "

Burr Kes Higgy
#14 #17 #20

YOU CAN PLAY ... Gay athletes. Straight allies. Teaming up for respect: http://youcanplayproject.org/

#35 'NucKô


    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,932 posts
  • Joined: 04-April 07

Posted 13 April 2012 - 10:55 PM

Let's see...other team lines up 4 across the blueline and won't let you enter the zone with speed. How do you counter that? You dump and chase. Hockey 101. Or in your case...Hockey For Idiots.

They aren't lining up 4 across the blueline on the PK. So why are we still doing the dump and chase?
Posted Image

#36 *Buzzsaw*


    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 496 posts
  • Joined: 07-May 09

Posted 13 April 2012 - 11:07 PM

Epic FAIL for PP coaches and AV.

How long does it take for them to get their heads out of their A**'s????

The drop pass is a failure, they need someone to carry the puck QUICKLY over the blue line and then pass, none of this delaying, allowing the other team to get setup.

This is not rocket science, when you have 5 men to the other team's 4, it is not difficult to get the puck in. Either you shoot it in with a pair of fast moving forwards coming in hard on each wing as the puck crosses the line, or you carry it in. They need to use the center of the ice too, enter on a wing, and pass back to the center to a defenceman or late entering forward.

Once in the zone, they need to move towards the net, and not scate around the outside. If you don't force the defence to react, there are no holes. If you move towards the net, you force the opposing players to move to you, and then the ice opens up, allowing a pass to a player in the clear.


#37 Cristalinastar


    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 411 posts
  • Joined: 21-May 11

Posted 13 April 2012 - 11:16 PM

We have very talented players. It's up to coaching to bring out the best application of their talents in order to dominate and be a successful team.

I dont proclaim to know everything about hockey but GET REAL. To continue doing the SAME thing expecting different results is insanity. They could have dealt with this ages ago. Its gone from bad to worse. The sedins passing and passing no shots generated, to issues gaining the line, now we're giving up shg?

Furthermore, to those who state "well, to be fair, we dont have erhoff or samuelsson etc" that is irrelevant. We dont have sidney crosby either, but we still expect our team to score goals
don't we?

We have to expect the coaches to work with what they have and adapt. They just keep rolling out that tired drop pass crap and leaving it to " the boys" to lead their team. Well they should have stepped up a long time ago to adapt, address issues, and figure it the $&@$ out.

I love my team and I'll always support them but I'm disappointed in the way they are being coached.
Get a clue Newell or get out!

Edited by Cristalinastar, 13 April 2012 - 11:25 PM.

16 WINS-its the beauty way to go!

Posted Image

credit to canazzy

#38 Lui's Knob

Lui's Knob

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,795 posts
  • Joined: 13-May 10

Posted 13 April 2012 - 11:19 PM

PP is soo bad they had 2 shorthanded goals against and went zilch.... BBBBADD

#39 DisplacedBCfan


    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,527 posts
  • Joined: 09-April 10

Posted 13 April 2012 - 11:20 PM

I'd like to see the whole coaching staff fired please

#40 magoomba


    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 357 posts
  • Joined: 16-December 08

Posted 14 April 2012 - 01:30 AM

In the second half of the season my belief is many teams picked up the scouting report on the Canucks.
Their PP breakout is based on the drop pass which hasn't been working because other teams are already anticipating this.
Not just in todays game (where they gave up a shorty) but I recall a few instances near the end of the season where they just couldn't get out of their zone because the play was so obvious and was read well in advance by the opposing checker.

After the trade deadline, as much as people like to say Hodgson only had one good month, we did lose a player who is capable of QBing the second PP unit working off the left circle.

In the playoffs, you play a team every other night for between 4 and 7 games.
After each game you need to make adjustments.
AV and the rest of the coaches have to take some of the blame.
You cannot rely simply on talent or that you have a better team on paper.
If something isn't working, you have to make a change.
In the playoffs you don't have 10 or 12 games to "see if things fall into place".

PS: would it kill AV to use a timeout once in a blue friggin moon?

Edited by magoomba, 14 April 2012 - 01:32 AM.

#41 Salmonberries


    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,605 posts
  • Joined: 22-November 11

Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:00 AM

It sure is curious to see the lengths that Vig will go to ensure that Keith Ballard never sets foot on the ice under any circumstances, even for one second, even if it means using Aaron Rome or Andrew Alberts, when the Canucks have a man advantage considering his effectiveness in a pp role with previous teams.

That Vig sure is one strange duck.


Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.