Robongo Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 No brainer in my oppinion. Schneids played well yesterday and the team played better in front of him, but that could also be attributed to the fact they were down 2-0 in the series. You gotta go with the man you got signed for the next 7 years or whatever it is. Sink or swim with your number one man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
originalcanucksdude Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Disagree. Contract means nothing next to winning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robongo Posted April 16, 2012 Author Share Posted April 16, 2012 They owe it to him I think, he's done so much for this club and has been the best goaltender we've had in the history of this franchise. They tried to Schneider experiment and failed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wendythirteenthrashers Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 dunno about that lu 7 goals against [8 with emptynetter]...team lackluster schneider 1 goal against...team givin'er the past should be immaterial...this is the now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 They owe it to him I think, he's done so much for this club and has been the best goaltender we've had in the history of this franchise. They tried to Schneider experiment and failed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuckelhead90 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 They owe it to him I think, he's done so much for this club and has been the best goaltender we've had in the history of this franchise. They tried to Schneider experiment and failed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
believeinblue Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 We could have been down 4-0 if it wasn't for Schneider. I'm a Lu and Schneider fan, I don't prefer one over the other however there were some saves that Schneider made to keep it a 0-0 game and I'm sure Luongo wouldn't have been able to stop it. (eg. 3 on 1 where Schneider lunged laterally and was still upright to get a shoulder on the puck whereas Luongo would have lunged but would have had the whole top of the net open due to his tendency to laying down on the ice.) Even the LAK goal wasn't Schneider's fault.. Edler having no coverage on Brown who was all alone in front of the net only to rebound the game winner... ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smurf47 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 What makes Lou #1?????? his stats are miles behind Schneids !! 2.41 GAA vs 1.96...you don;t win with sentiment !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharnhayre Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Doesn't matter whose in net, whether its Luongo, Schneider, McLean, R. Brodeur, or Garrett. If you don't score a damn goal, you ain't gonna win. Right now, Pittsburgh and us are in the same both but we both have problems that the other team could solve. Pens are scoring goals but gettting no goaltending. We are getting goaltending but no goals. If we could pull a switch, we'd both be up 3-0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enterin Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 No brainer in my oppinion. Schneids played well yesterday and the team played better in front of him, but that could also be attributed to the fact they were down 2-0 in the series. You gotta go with the man you got signed for the next 7 years or whatever it is. Sink or swim with your number one man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickly Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 They owe it to him I think, he's done so much for this club and has been the best goaltender we've had in the history of this franchise. They tried to Schneider experiment and failed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enterin Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Doesn't matter whose in net, whether its Luongo, Schneider, McLean, R. Brodeur, or Garrett. If you don't score a damn goal, you ain't gonna win. Right now, Pittsburgh and us are in the same both but we both have problems that the other team could solve. Pens are scoring goals but gettting no goaltending. We are getting goaltending but no goals. If we could pull a switch, we'd both be up 3-0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Ed Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 How many dumb ignorant fans throw comparisons around when obviously Lu plays more games. News flash hockey noobs: luongo is still better than Schneider. You would see this if Schneids gets full minutes but Schneids has potential to be just as good or better. But for now only a hockey noob says Schneids> Lu . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickly Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 How many dumb ignorant fans throw comparisons around when obviously Lu plays more games. News flash hockey noobs: luongo is still better than Schneider. You would see this if Schneids gets full minutes but Schneids has potential to be just as good or better. But for now only a hockey noob says Schneids> Lu . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canidiot Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 this is going to be one tough choice for av. go with lou and risk being fired for not using the better of the two that you have.go with cs and risk not using your number 1 based on what i have seen, cs is your best chance for winning. but if you loose, what choice saves av's job? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smurf47 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Lou plays more games...so...should be sharper and have better stats...not worse ! Stats are a measurement of performance and you can skew them however you want but his 2.41 GAA vs Corys 1.96 is miles apart !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canidiot Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 How many dumb ignorant fans throw comparisons around when obviously Lu plays more games. News flash hockey noobs: luongo is still better than Schneider. You would see this if Schneids gets full minutes but Schneids has potential to be just as good or better. But for now only a hockey noob says Schneids> Lu . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharnhayre Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 I go with Schneider on Wednesday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ṣpiderman Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 How many dumb ignorant fans throw comparisons around when obviously Lu plays more games. News flash hockey noobs: luongo is still better than Schneider. You would see this if Schneids gets full minutes but Schneids has potential to be just as good or better. But for now only a hockey noob says Schneids> Lu . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucks4dacup Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 How many dumb ignorant fans throw comparisons around when obviously Lu plays more games. News flash hockey noobs: luongo is still better than Schneider. You would see this if Schneids gets full minutes but Schneids has potential to be just as good or better. But for now only a hockey noob says Schneids> Lu . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.