I'd like to see the whole team take him out.
Keith will not finish that game. He either gets into too many fights and gets kicked out, or we injure the shi*t out of him. Say what you want about being a "classy" team, it ended up in us losing to Boston. This is a huge opportunity for the Canucks to show the NHL that we aren't going to stand for this kind of stuff anymore and take out Keith.
So you're basically requesting another Steve Moore incident. Another brilliant post. I guess you and other 'hockey fans' in this thread advocating such things were cheering the TV when Steve Moore got his so called comeuppance? I personally found that game to be one of the least enjoyable, dirty Canucks hockey games I've ever seen and I find it disgusting people are requesting something similar again on here.
Stick up for your teammate if he gets cheap shotted at the time, and hit Keith into oblivion within the rules. You don't plan to injure other players for months then cheap shot them if they don't want to fight later on. That's just as cowardly as Keith's hit.
Even more appalling are the people suggesting we go out and injure Kane, Toews, or some other player in retaliation if Keith doesn't want to have a fist fight. So we're going to start going out and injuring innocent people who had nothing to do with Daniel's injury just so Keith takes some flack in his dressing room and regrets his actions? Not only is that stupid reasoning, it'd probably result in them retaliating and we could fall short of the Cup again due to injuries. The Canucks aren't known to be a very tough team and you people are suggesting we start a retaliatory process that puts our key players at risk if we go to injure other teams' key players? Bravo for thinkin' up that plan.
Edited by Moonshinefe, 17 August 2012 - 06:43 AM.