Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

n00bxQb

[NHL 13] Complete Team Overalls (Warning: Image Heavy)

304 posts in this topic

What's Shane Doan rated at? Maybe if his rating decreased from chel 12, we can use that to give us negotiating advantage....

:bigblush:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Larson is the devils best defenseman? John Tavares is only 85? Dion Phaneuf an 88?

This will take some getting used to.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok good they lowered these drastically. Raymond was an 85 when I was at the playtest in March, I'll be surrised if they didn't bump him down to 80

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok good they lowered these drastically. Raymond was an 85 when I was at the playtest in March, I'll be surrised if they didn't bump him down to 80

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG WTF is Holtby rated worse than Peters, Clemmenson, Theodore, Enroth, Montoya, Reimer, Garon, Budaj, and Leighton. Are you fkn kidding me? I wouldn't trade Holtby for any of those pieces of garbage

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I see what they mean when they said they would be creating a bigger gap between star players and 3rd line grinders. Wow. This will definitely need some getting used to.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG WTF is Holtby rated worse than Peters, Clemmenson, Theodore, Enroth, Montoya, Reimer, Garon, Budaj, and Leighton.  Are you fkn kidding me?  I wouldn't trade Holtby for any of those pieces of garbage

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He probably has 5 stars potential though

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm scared to see our team, my prediction:

Kesler 85

Sedin's 90

Burrows 82

Raymond 78

Booth 82

Manny 80

Lappy 77

Kassian 74

Higgins 81

Hansen 80

Bieksa 81

Hamhuis 82

Ballard 80

Garrison 81

Edler 83

Tanev 73

Luongo 89 (already known)

Schneider 84

I'll probably be wrong on alot of it but they already weren't too generous with some of our team last year (imo) and now after seeing the way the rating's are now I have little hope that some of our players will be rated the way they should be.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm scared to see our team, my prediction:

Kesler 85

Sedin's 90

Burrows 82

Raymond 78

Booth 82

Manny 80

Lappy 77

Kassian 74

Higgins 81

Hansen 80

Bieksa 81

Hamhuis 82

Ballard 80

Garrison 81

Edler 83

Tanev 73

Luongo 89 (already known)

Schneider 84

I'll probably be wrong on alot of it but they already weren't too generous with some of our team last year (imo) and now after seeing the way the rating's are now I have little hope that some of our players will be rated the way they should be.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh a side note:

Judging by the way EA rated Riemer, Scrivens, Theodore and Clemmensen, Florida and Toronto both really need Luongo :lol:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Close

Sedins 91 (may have been 90)

Kesler 88

Burrows 85

Booth 82

Higgins 80

Raymond 80

Hansen 79

Lapierre 78

Malhotra 77

Kassian 75

Weise ???

Volpatti 69

Edler 88

Hamhuis 88

Bieksa 84

Garrison 82

Ballard 80

Tanev ???

Alberts ???

Luongo 89

Schneider 83

??? = Don't remember

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I Don't see any way Hamhuis, Edler, Burrows and Bieksa will go up, just look in depth at the eastern ratings, I would call our team a success if we managed to somehow keep the same ratings we had in last years game.

And as always the Stanley Cup champions (in this case LA) will be overrated again.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Close

Sedins 91 (may have been 90)

Kesler 88

Burrows 85

Booth 82

Higgins 80

Raymond 80

Hansen 79

Lapierre 78

Malhotra 77

Kassian 75

Weise ???

Volpatti 69

Edler 88

Hamhuis 88

Bieksa 84

Garrison 82

Ballard 80

Tanev ???

Alberts ???

Luongo 89

Schneider 83

??? = Don't remember

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no way Kesler's rating should be higher than both Spezza's (87) and Backstrom's (85).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Close

Sedins 91 (may have been 90)

Kesler 88

Burrows 85

Booth 82

Higgins 80

Raymond 80

Hansen 79

Lapierre 78

Malhotra 77

Kassian 75

Weise ???

Volpatti 69

Edler 88

Hamhuis 88

Bieksa 84

Garrison 82

Ballard 80

Tanev ???

Alberts ???

Luongo 89

Schneider 83

??? = Don't remember

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.