JohnLocke Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 What's Shane Doan rated at? Maybe if his rating decreased from chel 12, we can use that to give us negotiating advantage.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnLocke Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 Probably lost that A potential of his though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnLocke Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 Dbl post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
susraiders Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 Larson is the devils best defenseman? John Tavares is only 85? Dion Phaneuf an 88? This will take some getting used to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xbox Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 Ok good they lowered these drastically. Raymond was an 85 when I was at the playtest in March, I'll be surrised if they didn't bump him down to 80 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n00bxQb Posted August 16, 2012 Author Share Posted August 16, 2012 Ok good they lowered these drastically. Raymond was an 85 when I was at the playtest in March, I'll be surrised if they didn't bump him down to 80 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 OMG WTF is Holtby rated worse than Peters, Clemmenson, Theodore, Enroth, Montoya, Reimer, Garon, Budaj, and Leighton. Are you fkn kidding me? I wouldn't trade Holtby for any of those pieces of garbage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilbro Baggins Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 Now I see what they mean when they said they would be creating a bigger gap between star players and 3rd line grinders. Wow. This will definitely need some getting used to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Bissonnette Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 OMG WTF is Holtby rated worse than Peters, Clemmenson, Theodore, Enroth, Montoya, Reimer, Garon, Budaj, and Leighton. Are you fkn kidding me? I wouldn't trade Holtby for any of those pieces of garbage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 I just screwed up the leafs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 He probably has 5 stars potential though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 I'm scared to see our team, my prediction: Kesler 85 Sedin's 90 Burrows 82 Raymond 78 Booth 82 Manny 80 Lappy 77 Kassian 74 Higgins 81 Hansen 80 Bieksa 81 Hamhuis 82 Ballard 80 Garrison 81 Edler 83 Tanev 73 Luongo 89 (already known) Schneider 84 I'll probably be wrong on alot of it but they already weren't too generous with some of our team last year (imo) and now after seeing the way the rating's are now I have little hope that some of our players will be rated the way they should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n00bxQb Posted August 16, 2012 Author Share Posted August 16, 2012 I just screwed up the leafs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n00bxQb Posted August 16, 2012 Author Share Posted August 16, 2012 I'm scared to see our team, my prediction: Kesler 85 Sedin's 90 Burrows 82 Raymond 78 Booth 82 Manny 80 Lappy 77 Kassian 74 Higgins 81 Hansen 80 Bieksa 81 Hamhuis 82 Ballard 80 Garrison 81 Edler 83 Tanev 73 Luongo 89 (already known) Schneider 84 I'll probably be wrong on alot of it but they already weren't too generous with some of our team last year (imo) and now after seeing the way the rating's are now I have little hope that some of our players will be rated the way they should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 Oh a side note: Judging by the way EA rated Riemer, Scrivens, Theodore and Clemmensen, Florida and Toronto both really need Luongo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 Close Sedins 91 (may have been 90) Kesler 88 Burrows 85 Booth 82 Higgins 80 Raymond 80 Hansen 79 Lapierre 78 Malhotra 77 Kassian 75 Weise ??? Volpatti 69 Edler 88 Hamhuis 88 Bieksa 84 Garrison 82 Ballard 80 Tanev ??? Alberts ??? Luongo 89 Schneider 83 ??? = Don't remember Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n00bxQb Posted August 16, 2012 Author Share Posted August 16, 2012 I Don't see any way Hamhuis, Edler, Burrows and Bieksa will go up, just look in depth at the eastern ratings, I would call our team a success if we managed to somehow keep the same ratings we had in last years game. And as always the Stanley Cup champions (in this case LA) will be overrated again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiznak Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 Close Sedins 91 (may have been 90) Kesler 88 Burrows 85 Booth 82 Higgins 80 Raymond 80 Hansen 79 Lapierre 78 Malhotra 77 Kassian 75 Weise ??? Volpatti 69 Edler 88 Hamhuis 88 Bieksa 84 Garrison 82 Ballard 80 Tanev ??? Alberts ??? Luongo 89 Schneider 83 ??? = Don't remember Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n00bxQb Posted August 16, 2012 Author Share Posted August 16, 2012 There's no way Kesler's rating should be higher than both Spezza's (87) and Backstrom's (85). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozzy Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 Close Sedins 91 (may have been 90) Kesler 88 Burrows 85 Booth 82 Higgins 80 Raymond 80 Hansen 79 Lapierre 78 Malhotra 77 Kassian 75 Weise ??? Volpatti 69 Edler 88 Hamhuis 88 Bieksa 84 Garrison 82 Ballard 80 Tanev ??? Alberts ??? Luongo 89 Schneider 83 ??? = Don't remember Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.