• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      All Threads Must Contain Tags!   07/25/2017

      ALL THREADS MUST CONTAIN TAGS   All threads in this forum must contain tags prefixed to topic titles. The purpose of the tags is to eliminate confusion in recent threads lists, and to create an organized and consistent environment. Moderators may immediately lock and thread that does not contain tags.    Tags must be placed at the start of your thread title, following this exact formatting:    [Tag] Thread Title   Here are some of the most used popular tags:    [Proposal]
      A trade, or trades, for next season, or even the off-season.
      [Off-Season]
      FA signings, off-season trades for RFA's, UFA's rights etc...
      [Value Of]
      (A question regarding a players worth, whether from another team, or the Canucks)
      [Speculation] Posting a rumor (with a source of course), but providing why it could be possible for the Canucks to land that player.   [Discussion]
      Thoughts on team trading strategy and composition.   Please feel free to create your own tag if none of these suit your thread.   

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

kanucks1

(Proposal)Van-SJS Van-Cgy

16 posts in this topic

To Van:Pavelski,Clowe.

To SJS:Edler,Hansen,Raymond,Schroeder,1st 2013.

Then.....

To Van: Babchuk

To Cgy:Rodin,2nd 2013.

Lineup

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows

Clowe-Kesler-Pavelski

Booth-Malholtra-Kassian

Higgins-Lapierre-Weise

Volpatti-Ebbett

Hamhuis-Bieksa

Babchuk-Garisson

Ballard-Tanev

Alberts

Schneider

Luongo

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

San Jose isn't trading Pavelski. And if we're getting one of the best power forwards in the game, we aren't sticking him on the third line.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As much as i think Pavelski would be a terrific fit in our lineup, I wouldn't do the first deal.

The second one i might consider if the 2nd round pick was a lower round... as it stands right now we are overpaying

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're a sexy, young, intelligent young man, what kind of shampoo do you use OP?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Calgary trade doesn't work because they actually think they can make the playoffs and be a threat :lol:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't see San Jose making the deal.

If they are truly going to revamp their offence I would imagine it being Thornton or Marleau on their way out.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clowe is a waste of talent on the third

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I now put CLowe on the second line and Booth on the third. We can move around to see what fits.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Take out the Calgary trade completely. Instead of Clowe in the SJ trade, add Rodin to our side and put in Burns. Then this is our line-up.

Top six:

Sedin Sedin Burrows

Booth Kesler Pavelski

D pairings:

Garrison-Burns

Hamhuis-Bieksa

Ballard-Tanev

And San Jose's

Top six:

Marleau-Thorton-Clowe

Havlat-Couture-Shepard

D pairings:

Edler-Boyle

Murray-Demers

Stuart-Vlasic

Instant guaranteed Conference finalists.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Take out the Calgary trade completely. Instead of Clowe in the SJ trade, add Rodin to our side and put in Burns. Then this is our line-up.

Top six:

Sedin Sedin Burrows

Booth Kesler Pavelski

D pairings:

Garrison-Burns

Hamhuis-Bieksa

Ballard-Tanev

And San Jose's

Top six:

Marleau-Thorton-Clowe

Havlat-Couture-Shepard

D pairings:

Edler-Boyle

Murray-Demers

Stuart-Vlasic

Instant guaranteed Conference finalists.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no way san jose makes that deal, if they wouldnt move either of them for rick nash, why would they for that return? and no to the 2nd trade, im not a fan of inter division trades, nor am i a fan of any calgary dman.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no way san jose makes that deal, if they wouldnt move either of them for rick nash, why would they for that return? and no to the 2nd trade, im not a fan of inter division trades, nor am i a fan of any calgary dman.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

?.... Its for a pick and not that good of a propect!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.