Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

Van to Edm Lu deal Blockbuster

Proposal

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
11 replies to this topic

#1 Spyderr

Spyderr

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,522 posts
  • Joined: 05-July 08

Posted 12 January 2013 - 02:33 PM

Ok i know they are in the same division but would you do this deal as it is reported edm has shown interest in Lu. This would make both teams better and would probably make us and edm favorites. Deal only gets done if we cant sign edler.

To Edmonton

Luongo, Edler, Schroeder

To Van

Hall, Gagner, Teubert

They have Yakupov to replace hall and now have a very offensive d and a star goalie. They can give edler the money he wants.

We are

Sedin Sedin Burr
Hall Kesler Hansen
Higgins Gagner Booth
Raymond Lappy Manny
Kassian

Hamhuis Bieksa
Garrison Tanev
Ballard Corrado
Teubert K Conn

Schneider
LAck

Our back end obviously needs a dman again or one of our prospects to perform only if edler cant be resigned and will sign with edm

Flame away
Come on LU

#2 Zoolander

Zoolander

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,192 posts
  • Joined: 29-February 12

Posted 12 January 2013 - 02:46 PM

Our offense doesn't even receive much of an improvement and our backend gets very thin. Teubert can't really skate and his penalty minutes lead me to believe he is either a lazy player (hooking/tripping) or can't control his emotions well and takes dumb penalties.

Luongo will most likely be traded to TOR, FLA or the now rumoured PHI. I for one, would not want to play Edler and Luongo in our own division.
My 2014 Draft wishlist: 1st rd: Draisaitl, Virtanen, Scherbak. 2nd rd: Brendan Lemieux, Thatcher Demko (Goalie)
Posted Image
Future Canucks top 6:
Shinkaruk-Draisaitl-Scherbak
Virtanen-Horvat-Jensen

#3 ConnorFutureGM

ConnorFutureGM

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 327 posts
  • Joined: 05-March 11

Posted 12 January 2013 - 02:47 PM

Oilers aren't trading Hall.

#4 Mr. White

Mr. White

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,554 posts
  • Joined: 22-May 12

Posted 12 January 2013 - 03:08 PM

I wouldn't even want Hall. But I would accept Eberle or the Nuge but the Oilers aren't giving up any of their young players just yet

Edited by Mr. White, 12 January 2013 - 03:10 PM.

Posted Image
^VanCauck93^

#5 Rey

Rey

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,688 posts
  • Joined: 07-March 09

Posted 12 January 2013 - 03:09 PM

Doing this trade makes Edmonton so much closer to become a Dynasty. You ever see Hall vs Edler match ups? Every time they match up, Hall has his head down and Edler steps into one and destroys the kid.

#6 hudson bay rules

hudson bay rules

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,386 posts
  • Joined: 03-November 10

Posted 12 January 2013 - 03:14 PM

Can't imagine Lou willing to go to Edm.
I love rock and roll, just put another dime in the juice box baby.

#7 bigpush

bigpush

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 673 posts
  • Joined: 23-May 07

Posted 12 January 2013 - 03:54 PM

I don't think Edm goes for this either, who do they replace Gagner with?

RNH
Horcoff
Belanger
Lander

Pretty weak C depth even with Gagner and without they look bad.

And terrible value for Canucks doesn't work for either team IMO.

#8 oldnews

oldnews

    Declining Grinder

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,399 posts
  • Joined: 30-March 11

Posted 12 January 2013 - 04:23 PM

Can't imagine Lou willing to go to Edm.


No one is - hence the rebuild. UFAs snubbed them like they were Siberia. Draft picks don't have no trade clauses hahaha...

Hall and Gagner? meh. If the Oil wanted Edler, Eberle is the guy that would make me consider it.

And yeah, I know cfmg - save yourself your auto-post.

Edited by oldnews, 12 January 2013 - 04:24 PM.


#9 allkill326

allkill326

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,270 posts
  • Joined: 30-May 12

Posted 12 January 2013 - 04:50 PM

General balance of the transaction seems fair, but this proposal does not take into account what the GM wants or the team needs to become successful.
Posted Image

#10 Tortorella's Rant

Tortorella's Rant

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,359 posts
  • Joined: 11-April 12

Posted 12 January 2013 - 06:07 PM

Teubert, at the rate he is going, is not going to make the NHL.

He reminds me of Parent. A Canadian WJ, fairly highly praised, high round pick, fizzled out before ever becoming a regular NHL'er.
Posted Image

#11 aqua59

aqua59

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,105 posts
  • Joined: 16-January 08

Posted 13 January 2013 - 08:39 AM

I think that this is far too big a deal to make within your division. It could bite either team in the a$$ for years to come. Gillis wouldn't do it.

#12 brewdog

brewdog

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 356 posts
  • Joined: 30-June 12

Posted 13 January 2013 - 09:06 AM

I don't think Dubnyk is getting the recognition he deserves. Aside from the obvious reasons why this deal wouldn't happen, I think Edmonton has faith in Dubnyk.




Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.