Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

Players that frustrate me. They need to read this post-game and smarten up.


  • Please log in to reply
89 replies to this topic

#1 Thirty Niner

Thirty Niner

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,911 posts
  • Joined: 06-February 03

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:03 PM

Kassian - All hype, all bark, no bite. Soft. Showed good discipline early on tonight though.
Bieksa - Done nothing since the 2011 San Jose game winning goal. Dude puts on this "I'm Kevin Bieksa face" but is afraid to get his feet wet in the corners. Didn't respond with anything when Sedin was knocked out last year.
Booth - Too busy working on his twitter fan base to work on his shot accuracy.
Hamhuis - Like Bieksa, this guy is supposed to be a defenseman. USE YOUR BODY, HIT, OR DO SOMETHING.
Wiese - This guy skates around and doesn't do much. Can I have Raffi Torres back please?
e


Discuss.
  • 2

#2 CanucksSayEh

CanucksSayEh

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,325 posts
  • Joined: 07-March 12

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:04 PM

*
POPULAR

Why you put Weise in there? dude is having a beast game and has always been a solid player for us.
  • 8

#3 Nashi

Nashi

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,881 posts
  • Joined: 17-March 09

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:06 PM

*
POPULAR

You wouldn't be posting this if we were winning. :picard:
  • 11

canucks141.png


#4 Thirty Niner

Thirty Niner

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,911 posts
  • Joined: 06-February 03

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:08 PM

I don't like Wiese.

When he is on the ice, the opposition is like "Oh look, it's Dale Wiese."

When Torres was on the ice they were saying "Keep your head up guys, Raffi Torres is out there."

Huge difference.

I want a guy on my team that is hard to play against. Like Cooke used to be. Torres. Ruutu.

I don't care how hated they are.

We need the LA Kings "we're douchebags but we get it done" model. Now or it's going to get too late.

We have the skill up front. We need guys that will grind the crap out of the other team. Bang them up hard and run up the score. It's that simple.

The new model. AV needs to light a spark under the team and stop chewing so much gum, it's bad for your teeth,

Edited by Thirty Niner, 19 January 2013 - 10:09 PM.

  • 1

#5 Bang Bang Boogie

Bang Bang Boogie

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,050 posts
  • Joined: 19-February 06

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:08 PM

*
POPULAR

Why would you throw Booth in there? He's not even playing.
  • 11
Posted Image

#6 JimLahey

JimLahey

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,439 posts
  • Joined: 03-September 12

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:09 PM

*
POPULAR

Posters that bother me? The ones who panic and complain about a team on every aspect based on 2/3 of a game.

This game has been disappointing thus far, but the canucks will not be going 48-0-0, nor will they go 0-48-0
  • 5

hL9YqYN.jpg


#7 Patrick Jane

Patrick Jane

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 772 posts
  • Joined: 06-February 12

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:10 PM

wow this is game one.

Look what the kings did tonight and we are missing kesler and booth.
Have you ever played hockey before cause every new season the fisrt couple of games some players are rusty.
  • 1
Posted Image
Drouin#27 Halifax Mooseheads Star

Credit to Canucks Top Scorer

#8 Thirty Niner

Thirty Niner

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,911 posts
  • Joined: 06-February 03

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:13 PM

I put Booth in there because he is an insignificant waste of a 2nd line roster spot IMO. Higgins, however, is a beast.
  • 0

#9 Noheart

Noheart

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,810 posts
  • Joined: 01-June 12

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:13 PM

*
POPULAR

Extremely easy to pick out the people who started watching hockey when the Canucks became contenders
  • 10
Posted Image

BEASTLY!!!

#10 peener

peener

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 688 posts
  • Joined: 02-April 07

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:14 PM

coach thirty niner
  • 0
Posted Image


Twilight Sparkle rocks the house

#11 CanucksSayEh

CanucksSayEh

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,325 posts
  • Joined: 07-March 12

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:14 PM

Booth is a good player too, just injured right now.

Edited by CanucksSayEh, 19 January 2013 - 10:16 PM.

  • 0

#12 Thirty Niner

Thirty Niner

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,911 posts
  • Joined: 06-February 03

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:14 PM

Extremely easy to pick out the people who started watching hockey when the Canucks became contenders


The Canucks were contenders back when we had Murray Baron bro.

Which one of our D-men block shots like he did?
  • 0

#13 D.Doughty

D.Doughty

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,013 posts
  • Joined: 04-March 12

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:15 PM

Hamhuis scored though...
  • 1

#14 Thirty Niner

Thirty Niner

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,911 posts
  • Joined: 06-February 03

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:15 PM

Double post oops.

Edited by Thirty Niner, 19 January 2013 - 10:16 PM.

  • 0

#15 Thirty Niner

Thirty Niner

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,911 posts
  • Joined: 06-February 03

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:16 PM

I loved Raffi too, but he was a 3rd liner for us wasn't he? and a 1st round pick? A guy with some years under his belt too. Dale is a sophomore, has mad potential, good size and speed. He can be a legit player some day and isn't costing us anything right now. The list of 4th line players better than Weise is very very short.


Why can none of our forwards play with as much passion as this guy did right here?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzQYCCheSkQ

RIP.
  • 3

#16 **Pavel4Life**

**Pavel4Life**

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,729 posts
  • Joined: 24-March 09

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:17 PM

I put Booth in there because he is an insignificant waste of a 2nd line roster spot IMO. Higgins, however, is a beast.


Ha!
  • 0
CFOO SIG FTW!


QUOTE (bugmo @ Jul 23 2009, 12:09 AM) And you are an idiot who can't see things for the way they are. It's people like you who make it seem okay for the canucks to have a non playoff making team every year. Gillis supporter go jump off the Patullo.

This was said to me and it makes me laugh everytime I read it.

#17 CRAZY_4_NAZZY

CRAZY_4_NAZZY

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,753 posts
  • Joined: 12-April 09

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:18 PM

And why would they need to listen to someone like you?
  • 0

2moy3iq.png

 


#18 peener

peener

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 688 posts
  • Joined: 02-April 07

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:18 PM

Why can none of our forwards play with as much passion as this guy did right here?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzQYCCheSkQ

RIP.



oh man was i ever pumped watching that
  • 0
Posted Image


Twilight Sparkle rocks the house

#19 Thirty Niner

Thirty Niner

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,911 posts
  • Joined: 06-February 03

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:22 PM

What I don't understand is how people can support a soft team that was knocked out in the first round of the playoffs, when we are 3 or 4 big roster moves away from having the powerhouse we had when we were up 2-0 against Boston in the SCF.

Then people are like, "oh I can tell who is a fan only when the Canucks are contenders."

PLEASE dude.

I am about something the management has not been for the last season, IMPROVING the team. Okay. Obviously what we have isn't cutting it. It's time to innovate. Why can't the Canucks be hard hitting and ruthless? The best effort last season was against Boston, hands down.

Let's just sit with what we have now. When Duncan Keith levels our top forward with an elbow to the head, then what?

We need some Prongeress.

Edited by Thirty Niner, 19 January 2013 - 10:26 PM.

  • 0

#20 iinatcc

iinatcc

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 609 posts
  • Joined: 11-May 11

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:28 PM

wow this is game one.

Look what the kings did tonight and we are missing kesler and booth.
Have you ever played hockey before cause every new season the fisrt couple of games some players are rusty.


Kings won the cup ... the can be forgiven by having one bad game. What's the Canuck's excuse?
  • 0

#21 lowest common denominator

lowest common denominator

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 818 posts
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:30 PM

BahahahI got putrty buzz goin on roifght now tooowooo LETS GO NUUUUUXX!!!!!!!!! :towel:
  • 0

#22 Thirty Niner

Thirty Niner

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,911 posts
  • Joined: 06-February 03

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:33 PM

Kings won the cup ... the can be forgiven by having one bad game. What's the Canuck's excuse?


Exactly, this isn't just about tonight.. look at what Toronto did tonight! It's about what the future brings to avoid nights like tonight.
  • 0

#23 TheWheeler

TheWheeler

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 744 posts
  • Joined: 22-October 08

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:46 PM

It's not so much the players (to an extent) as it is the coach who puts the players on the ice and the GM who signs the players.

Management has created a team full of averages.

Vancouver, where is your SWAGGER?
  • 0

#24 doobiedoodoo

doobiedoodoo

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 385 posts
  • Joined: 01-December 07

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:47 PM

First game and we already have these posts?? Seriously? Everyone needs to chill.
  • 0

#25 Nuckhead13

Nuckhead13

    K-Wing Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 64 posts
  • Joined: 19-January 12

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:56 PM

I put Booth in there because he is an insignificant waste of a 2nd line roster spot IMO. Higgins, however, is a beast.

so if higgins was injured and booth was playing, booth would be a "beast''?
  • 0
Posted Image

#26 Rounoush

Rounoush

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,105 posts
  • Joined: 19-October 10

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:58 PM

Obvious troll is obvious.
  • 0
Posted Image
Thanks a bunch to khalifawiz501 for the signature.

#27 bbgunner

bbgunner

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 509 posts
  • Joined: 15-October 06

Posted 19 January 2013 - 11:00 PM

Which game were you watching OP? Booth is not even playing tonight.........

The entire team played like S#%* tonight, NO defense at all!
And worse coaching decision ever = putting Hansen with Sedins on 1st PP!
  • 0
Posted Image

#28 Nuckhead13

Nuckhead13

    K-Wing Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 64 posts
  • Joined: 19-January 12

Posted 19 January 2013 - 11:01 PM

It's not so much the players (to an extent) as it is the coach who puts the players on the ice and the GM who signs the players.

Management has created a team full of averages.

Vancouver, where is your SWAGGER?

dont ever say "SWAGGER" again, when referring to hockey... this is'nt basketball, or a drake video.

Edited by Nuckhead13, 19 January 2013 - 11:03 PM.

  • 0
Posted Image

#29 EmployeeoftheMonth

EmployeeoftheMonth

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,402 posts
  • Joined: 04-September 06

Posted 19 January 2013 - 11:04 PM

HAAAAAArumph
  • 0
Posted Image
Posted Image

#30 gamasutra

gamasutra

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 763 posts
  • Joined: 21-April 07

Posted 19 January 2013 - 11:07 PM

It's a good thing fans aren't GM's otherwise half the team would be traded after every loss.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.