• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

kanucks1

[Trade] Bishop to lightning

Recommended Posts

His going to end up like Lindback for TB. Not alot of confidence in Bishop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

seriously why philly and tampa never seem to be able to get a good goalie.. always average at best.. those 2 teams would have multiple cups by now...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bishop looking like a solid pick-up already. 40 Saves and looking for the Shutout.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bishop looking like a solid pick-up already. 40 Saves and looking for the Shutout.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great debut for Bishop. Shutout Canes on the road with 45 saves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

45 save shutout, 5-0 win for TB. Lol Ottawa paid nothing for Bishop and ended up getting Conacher for him. Bishop is tallest goalie to ever play in the NHL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ottawa is set for the future with Lehner and set for the present with Anderson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cory conacher and a 4th ouch overpayment

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i still think overpayment considering ottawa originally got him for a 2nd round pick and tampa bay could of aquired him for the same price not it cost them a top rookie and 4th round pick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

big ben bishop 3 goals on 18 shots. I think if they offered MG conacher and a 4th, he would have taken it, lol. Too bad yzerman is of the Osgood enough school of how to get a goalie. When is he going to learn...should have ponied up for RL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

big ben bishop 3 goals on 18 shots. I think if they offered MG conacher and a 4th, he would have taken it, lol. Too bad yzerman is of the Osgood enough school of how to get a goalie. When is he going to learn...should have ponied up for RL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as dumb as saying you rather have Chris Tanev at 800 000k instead of Weber at or a 120 million. Luongo is twice the goalie Bishop is. I wish nothing but the tanking of Ben Bishop. I seriously do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as dumb as saying you rather have Chris Tanev at 800 000k instead of Weber at or a 120 million. Luongo is twice the goalie Bishop is. I wish nothing but the tanking of Ben Bishop. I seriously do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your comparison is inaccurate. Weber is producing significantly more than Tanev. The comparison comes nowhere close to Bishop vs Luongo. Bishop is not only younger but has better numbers than Luongo as well. I agree with noheart, I would choose Bishop over Luongo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I press on the Bishop to TB thread right? 3 pages. Not gonna read all three pages, not that interested really... So I go to the last post; I usually read from last and up anyways.

What do I find? Some douche says he'd rather have Bishop than Luongo.

To this douche; WTF??!

Is not throwing Luongo under the bus enough? Do you REALLY HAVE to dig him a grave?

I hope you get hit by the same bus you threw Luongo under.

EDIT: spell check wrote douche instead of dude. I take no responsibility.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.