Where'd Luongo? Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 20 hours ago, ThaShady1 said: No need to cherry pick my comment. Of course they won't, they'll be looking at underlying numbers same as anyone else, once they target in on players. I meant more it depends on their plan of building. If they have a sheet of every defenceman available to them to choose from, Sbisa's name might not jump out at them. If they have a team-by-team style analysis, then likely he's the first guy they choose from the Canucks. I feel like they'll have a better top 4 available to them than Sbisa, and a contract of his cap hit for a 5/6 defender will only be taken by them if they need to get to the cap floor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boudrias Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 At what point do fans accept that this org has to be in a full rebuild? Markstrom at 27 is a #1 quality tender. Bachman is capable of playing 20 games in backup. Miller will want more than 1 year and is not an option at more than that. Bringing Demko up to Van earlier than another year of AHL experience is reckless. Use Miller's CAP space on other parts of the roster. Taking old contracts in exchange for draft picks or prospects should be a serious option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 44 minutes ago, Boudrias said: At what point do fans accept that this org has to be in a full rebuild? Markstrom at 27 is a #1 quality tender. Bachman is capable of playing 20 games in backup. Miller will want more than 1 year and is not an option at more than that. Bringing Demko up to Van earlier than another year of AHL experience is reckless. Use Miller's CAP space on other parts of the roster. Taking old contracts in exchange for draft picks or prospects should be a serious option. 3 hours ago, J.R. said: Tanev to DAL for one of their goalies (cap dump and one year tandem with Marky) their 1st and Honka? 1 hour ago, J.R. said: We could send them say Subban back to replace the D prospect but then they'd need to add say a 3rd. We also have an awful lot of wingers coming if they'd prefer one back (in an even larger deal). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 1 hour ago, J.R. said: We could send them say Subban back to replace the D prospect but then they'd need to add say a 3rd. We also have an awful lot of wingers coming if they'd prefer one back (in an even larger deal). Stars need so much, i think there's big deal out their for them. They need a #1 goalie, Top pairing LHD, Top 4 RHD, top 9 RW, 2x top 6 LW. I can't believe how bad their roster looks warning.....another off topic armchair..... FORWARDS (____) - Segiun - benn Faska - Spezza - (____) McKenzie - - Shore - (____) Ritchie- Eakin - Cracknell In the pool: Smith (C), Dickinson (C),Tufte (LW), Gurianov (RW), Elie (LW) DEFENSE Hamhuis - Klingberg Oleksiak - (____) Lindell - (____) In the pool: Honka (RHD) GOALIES (____) Resign Hudler, let Hemsky and Sharp walk. Trade Neimi + Nichuskin rights + 4th round pick to Pits for MAF Trade Lehtonen (retain 20%) + 39th overall to VAN for Pedan + Rodin's rights Draft Liljegren/Heiskanen 8th or consider trading down the 8th for 11th + 42nd Draft Foote at 11th Draft Oettinger at 42nd Sign Stafford, Stone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreyHatnDart Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 1 hour ago, Where'd Luongo? said: Not sure how the gif applies to my comment but thanks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.