Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Kenny Blankenship

Members
  • Posts

    472
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Kenny Blankenship

  1. 33 minutes ago, Scottydzik said:

    Graves leddy olesiak Larsson those our 4 d that woulda fit in perfectly with guys we have 

    Literally only Larsson makes sense for us, and as has been mentioned many times before, we didn’t even have an opportunity to sign him. Imagine we gave up an asset for his rights and he just ended up signing in Seattle anyways. It would be pandemonium on here. Some of y’all will never be happy.

    • Upvote 1
    • Vintage 1
  2. 57 minutes ago, 6of1_halfdozenofother said:

    Kids are out of school, some posters have payroll-envy, and things aren't rolling out as they had it planned on NHL '13.

     

    By the way, I'm not able to send you a physical beer, so hope you're able to enjoy the virtual beer.  ;)

    I’m at a nice little pub on the island, crushed a couple Kilkennys 

    • Cheers 3
  3. 3 minutes ago, Dazzle said:

    We have a toxic fanbase, part of which is well represented on places like reddit, twitter, and some members here. *cough* Squamfan...

    I honestly just don’t understand it though. Everything that’s reported by local media always ends up having some form of negative spin on it. What’s the point in wasting your time and energy on being so negative. I’m just sick of every bit of news coming out a Vancouver is just useless conjecture. Damn, I need a beer lol. 

    • Cheers 4
  4. 6 minutes ago, Scottydzik said:

    Not at all holtby has value it’s been leaked they take Schmidt if you don’t find a trade partner you then have freed up 10 mil in cap and say have a d Corp of 

    Hughes fa/zadarov 

    graves/leddy Myers 

    Rath/juolevi hamonic 


    if he woulda made one of those kind of trades 

    looks a lot better then last year 

    It’s so redundant to give up pieces to get Leddy when we already have Schmidt. I’m not gonna reply after this because you are literally trippin’ my man hahahaha. 

  5. 24 minutes ago, Scottydzik said:

    So remember this another flaw of Benning is asset management he’s willing to risk losing good prospect rather then flipping him and 2nd for a leddy or graves zadarov 

    Okay let’s say, hypothetically, we pick one of those guys up. Who gets exposed on D then? Do we lose OJ as a result? So you wanna pay a second for an dman and in the process lose a dman. So instead of losing 1 good prospect, we lose 2, and a pick. What a head scratcher that would be. 

    • Thanks 1
    • Cheers 3
  6. 1 minute ago, Elias Pettersson said:

    Pettersson, Boeser, Miller, Horvat, Pearson, Dickinson, Motte.

     

    That's your 7 forwards.  Seattle can pick one of Virtanen, Lind, MacEwen, Gadjovich, Highmore.  Or they can take Madison Bowey.  Or they can take Holtby.

     

    Which one you think they are taking?

    With that selection they might just end up picking a name out of a hat

  7. 2 minutes ago, Alflives said:

    It’s not about points; it’s about this guy playing a defensive minded role as a centre.  He’s horrid on faceoffs!  Does Bo take all the D zone left hand draws?  This trade is very likely to cost us Lind.

    is this guy worth Lind and a third?  

    Every team is going to lose someone, Alf. We should consider ourselves lucky that we won’t have better talent exposed. We just got a big defense first center for fairly cheap. Too much value is being placed on a 3rd rounder. 

    • Cheers 1
×
×
  • Create New...