lappykass Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Hell yea 1st overall if I knew hed be the next Patrick Roy! Kidding, I'd say a top 5 pick? Top 7 latest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 1. Ovechkin 2. Malkin 3. Rinne 4. Radulov 5. Schneider 6. Krejci 7. Green 8. Callahan 9. Streit 10. Edler 11. Zajac 12. Franzen 13. Ladd 14. Versteeg 15. Goligoski 16. Booth 17. Grabovski 18. Stafford 19. Meszaros 20. Dubinsky 21. Bolland 22. Wheeler 23. Barker 24. Dubnyk 25. Brouwer 26. Comeau 27. Hansen 28. Grossman 29. Wolski 30. Campoli That's the way I see it, based if the GM's knew what they would be like now, and the player's abilities and what they bring. Not at all by team priorities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shcott Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 I'd say anywhere from 4-6. Depends if you factor in other players that also went down the board later Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUCKS4CUP 28 Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 There would be no point of the draft if we knew how good someone would become. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thirteen Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Took him 6 years to devlope. I think his draft # is right on considering he could of been a bust if he was taken by a team that laid more pressure on him instwas of letting him find his game and perfect it the way he has in Vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Garret's moustache Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 I say 3rd... I'd definatley rather have schneider than Cam Barker or Andrew Ladd... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b-mo Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 well he for sure would have been drafted higher than dubnyk and montoya. but lets be honest, if going into the 2004 draft we thought we'd wait 8 years to get impactful goaltending out of our first round pick, we probably wouldnt have drafted him at all. not that it was indicative of his play, but just crappy circumstances since he's always been stuck behind luongo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curmudgeon Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Don't much like what-if questions. If you aunt had a d**k she'd be your uncle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danjr Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Wow that draft turned out a lot of NHL players. Most times you'd see half as many players actually get into a team uniform. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Probably one of the deepest drafts in a while. Here's how I'd place them: 1 Oveckin 2 Malkin 3 Rinne 4 Cory Schneider 5 Nicklas Backstrom 6 Mike Green 7 Alex Edler 8 Mark Streit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dasein Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Schneider doesn't become what he is without the patience Vancouver had because of Roberto Luongo. Rushed and Schneider could have easily been a Steve Mason or a career backup. Knowing Vancouver's media, he would have been torn to pieces under the pressure of playing goal in Vancouver while not being ready for the #1 role. Remember how bad he was just 2-3 years ago when Luongo was injured? He couldn't even take the starting job away from the likes of Sanford, LaBarbara and Raycroft. Without Luongo, Schneider would have been expected to be our starter 2-3 years ago, and there would have been a good chance that his career gets ruined by the media pressure. A player's draft position does not depend purely on potential but also how fast the player becomes NHL-ready and the team's immediate needs. Most teams that pick a goaltender in the top 10 need him immediately within the next 2-3 years. Since Schneider wouldn't have been NHL-ready in 2-3 years, he definitely shouldn't have been a top 10 pick. Not every goaltender is elite from the start like Roberto Luongo (4th overall - played in the NHL as a starter since 21 years old). Some guys like Schneider take a long time and some patience, and that's what he needed. Only guys like Roberto or recently, Carey Price, who can dominate from an early age should go high in the draft - as in a top 10 pick. Schneider should have gone somewhere in the bottom half of the 1st round because he wasn't going to be elite right away - which is where he went. Somewhere between 15 and 30th overall. He is very lucky that we had the time and patience to develop him into the product that he is today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyBernard Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 The real question should be Malkin or Ovechkin.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dKs89 Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Probably one of the deepest drafts in a while. Here's how I'd place them: 1 Oveckin 2 Malkin 3 Rinne 4 Cory Schneider 5 Nicklas Backstrom 6 Mike Green 7 Alex Edler 8 Mark Streit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckelhead70 Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Daigle was a "can't miss" prospect and well he missed. It's your 4 rounders and beyond that generally become your character/roll players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beer&meat Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Lolno. You might want to look at 2003. 2004 doesn't even come close to 2003. You're reading the question wrong. It's knowing what he is NOW not what he was before. That makes him easily top 5, most likely 4th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCammer Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Sorry, but these "what if" crystal ball topics are stupid. He got drafted in the position he was drafted in, plain and simple. Draft position is based on team needs or getting the best player available at the time. Goalies rarely go in the first round and are rarely top 5. In addition, all Schneider has become is a member of a great goalie tandem in Vancouver. He is still the back-up. I admit he seems to have tremendous upside but what the hell does that have to do with his original draft position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SukhKular Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Schneider doesn't become what he is without the patience Vancouver had because of Roberto Luongo. Rushed and Schneider could have easily been a Steve Mason or a career backup. Knowing Vancouver's media, he would have been torn to pieces under the pressure of playing goal in Vancouver while not being ready for the #1 role. Remember how bad he was just 2-3 years ago when Luongo was injured? He couldn't even take the starting job away from the likes of Sanford, LaBarbara and Raycroft. Without Luongo, Schneider would have been expected to be our starter 2-3 years ago, and there would have been a good chance that his career gets ruined by the media pressure. A player's draft position does not depend purely on potential but also how fast the player becomes NHL-ready and the team's immediate needs. Most teams that pick a goaltender in the top 10 need him immediately within the next 2-3 years. Since Schneider wouldn't have been NHL-ready in 2-3 years, he definitely shouldn't have been a top 10 pick. Not every goaltender is elite from the start like Roberto Luongo (4th overall - played in the NHL as a starter since 21 years old). Some guys like Schneider take a long time and some patience, and that's what he needed. Only guys like Roberto or recently, Carey Price, who can dominate from an early age should go high in the draft - as in a top 10 pick. Schneider should have gone somewhere in the bottom half of the 1st round because he wasn't going to be elite right away - which is where he went. Somewhere between 15 and 30th overall. He is very lucky that we had the time and patience to develop him into the product that he is today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I R Baboon Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 I'll have to see what he's like in his first full season, but as of right now I'd have to say anywhere from 8th to 18th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canacks1970 Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 If we knew what Schneider would become, what position would he have been drafted? Lets assume every team decided to go with the BPA during the draft. My guess is 5th overall. Here is the list of how the draft went in 2004: http://www.mynhldraft.com/2004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dKs89 Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Rofl you're going to choose a backup goalie 4th? Schneider hasn't proven anything except that he's a great backup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.