TACIC Posted July 29, 2013 Author Share Posted July 29, 2013 Who's Kings fan? And what does having to live in a house have to do with anything? You lost me on those... But calm down there, I was just joking around... Because Mark Bergevin will actually take a dump in a paper bag and send it to you . But I'll put it from a Habs fans prespective for you: Sweat and Joslin are no longer Canucks property. So what you proposed was: Edler, Schroeder and a 2nd For Galchenyuk, Tinordi, and a first. I wouldn't give up Galchenyuk so easily, and I know the Habs wouldn't either. The only way you're prying Galchenyuk away is by over paying, and giving up two higher end prospects (ie; Horvat, and Jensen.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonny_Bohonos_14 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Change the 1st to Tinordi and I'd do it. Gallagher is good and does play bigger than his size suggests, but I'm not 100% sold on him yet. I also don't like taking away from our defense without having someone coming back. Tinordi may be tough to swallow, but he would be losing ice time do to Edler's arrival, and they'd be improving their defense in the process. I'm on the fence for trading Edler. We'll be taking a hit defensively by moving him, so unless we get a package that really benefits us right away (top 6 forward) or long term (multiple prospects) why move him? Montreal's Defense: Subban - Markov Edler - Georges Bouillon - Emelin Diaz Vancouver's Defense: Hamhuis - Bieksa Garrison - Tanev/Corrado Tinordi - UFA/Trade/Tanev Weber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted July 29, 2013 Author Share Posted July 29, 2013 Change the 1st to Tinordi and I'd do it. Gallagher is good and does play bigger than his size suggests, but I'm not 100% sold on him yet. I also don't like taking away from our defense without having someone coming back. Tinordi may be tough to swallow, but he would be losing ice time do to Edler's arrival, and they'd be improving their defense in the process. I'm on the fence for trading Edler. We'll be taking a hit defensively by moving him, so unless we get a package that really benefits us right away (top 6 forward) or long term (multiple prospects) why move him? Montreal's Defense: Subban - Markov Edler - Georges Bouillon - Emelin Diaz Vancouver's Defense: Hamhuis - Bieksa Garrison - Tanev/Corrado Tinordi - UFA/Trade/Tanev Weber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonny_Bohonos_14 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 I would do that but we do sign Murray/Whitney with that cap space we save and we resign Tanev so we aren't in that bad shape. Plus Montreal wont give up Tinordi they need him or Beaulieu to replace Markov soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 i'm just not a fan of tinordi. would rather Nathan Beaulieu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted July 29, 2013 Author Share Posted July 29, 2013 How about this: To Van: Gallagher, Tinordi, 2nd To Mtl: Edler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLemming Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 The trade is for Gallagher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Change the 1st to Tinordi and I'd do it. Gallagher is good and does play bigger than his size suggests, but I'm not 100% sold on him yet. I also don't like taking away from our defense without having someone coming back. Tinordi may be tough to swallow, but he would be losing ice time do to Edler's arrival, and they'd be improving their defense in the process. I'm on the fence for trading Edler. We'll be taking a hit defensively by moving him, so unless we get a package that really benefits us right away (top 6 forward) or long term (multiple prospects) why move him? Montreal's Defense: Subban - Markov Edler - Georges Bouillon - Emelin Diaz Vancouver's Defense: Hamhuis - Bieksa Garrison - Tanev/Corrado Tinordi - UFA/Trade/Tanev Weber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jester13 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Thoughts on a trade straight across: Edler for Subban? Subban is due for a hefty raise and Montreal might not want to pay it. With the youngest Subban in our system, maybe PK would take a slight hit in salary? Is it a fair trade? Do you think either side would do it? Would you do it? I would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted July 29, 2013 Author Share Posted July 29, 2013 I would sign Fistric for the bottom pair. Tinordi-Fistric would be one nasty pair to play against. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted July 29, 2013 Author Share Posted July 29, 2013 Thoughts on a trade straight across: Edler for Subban? Subban is due for a hefty raise and Montreal might not want to pay it. With the youngest Subban in our system, maybe PK would take a slight hit in salary? Is it a fair trade? Do you think either side would do it? Would you do it? I would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Sounds nice but what about Tanev? 2nd pair or trade? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laxgoalie Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 More like you guys offering Eller, Diaz and Markov for Horvat, Jensen and 1 first Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laxgoalie Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 dp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted July 30, 2013 Author Share Posted July 30, 2013 Not interested in your kings/muntreal perspective. This is a Canucks forum. We are Canucks fans. Not fans of some mickey mouse organization or dinosaur organization that refuses to change its hideous uniform. Thirdly, no way do the rotten habs take Horvat and Jensen from us for their unproven prospects. Galchenyuk, Tinordi, (both of whom are unproven) and a 1st for Edler, Schroeder, Rai, Reinprecht, and a 2nd is more than balanced for them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Don't be mad it actually helps when a fan knows the value and if the player is available instead of us gauging it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laxgoalie Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Not interested in your kings/muntreal perspective. This is a Canucks forum. We are Canucks fans. Not fans of some mickey mouse organization or dinosaur organization that refuses to change its hideous uniform. Thirdly, no way do the rotten habs take Horvat and Jensen from us for their unproven prospects. Galchenyuk, Tinordi, (both of whom are unproven) and a 1st for Edler, Schroeder, Rai, Reinprecht, and a 2nd is more than balanced for them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted July 30, 2013 Author Share Posted July 30, 2013 His posts are so annoying. I would just ignore him if I were you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westcoast Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 I'd like Maccarron and a first ,then we'd have two big monsters in the top six for horgaunshink and the boys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted July 30, 2013 Author Share Posted July 30, 2013 I'd like Maccarron and a first ,then we'd have two big monsters in the top six for horgaunshink and the boys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.