Nessnuck27 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Since tanev and management are no longer talking and for some reason we are unable to resign him I think we should trade tanevs rights for fransons rights. Franson wound give us a lot mote size and offense on our backend as well as keep a right handed d man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangelos Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 no thanks we have enough DEFENCEmen who can't actually play defence as it is. go figure right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plum Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Underpayment by us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niloc009 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 no thanks we have enough DEFENCEmen who can't actually play defence as it is. go figure right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theshield Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Franson>Tanev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Absent Canuck Posted August 7, 2013 Share Posted August 7, 2013 Canucks love this trade, Leafs not so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigpush Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Would Tanev and Jensen for Franson or Tanev and 1st make it work. I personally would be willing to move a prospect/ pick to get Franson, he proved he can put the puck in the net last year and has great size. I would say Jensen/pick would be conditional on him signing. Hamhuis Bieksa Edler Garrison *Alberts Franson Weber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Would Tanev and Jensen for Franson or Tanev and 1st make it work. I personally would be willing to move a prospect/ pick to get Franson, he proved he can put the puck in the net last year and has great size. I would say Jensen/pick would be conditional on him signing. Hamhuis Bieksa Edler Garrison *Alberts Franson Weber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Franson is worth way more then Tanev. People on here need to realize that, although Tanev is good, he's "3rd pairing defenseman who can't get points" good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaji Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Franson is worth way more then Tanev. People on here need to realize that, although Tanev is good, he's "3rd pairing defenseman who can't get points" good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Franson is worth way more then Tanev. People on here need to realize that, although Tanev is good, he's "3rd pairing defenseman who can't get points" good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Franson is worth way more then Tanev. People on here need to realize that, although Tanev is good, he's "3rd pairing defenseman who can't get points" good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.