sam13371337

the guy on the left, who seems to have a fetish for military camo really doesn't give you a bad feeling in your stomach?

also if you see a weirdo looking civilian in military camo... that's also a big red flag.

your spidey senses must be broken

something about those 2 missing teenagers looks was off putting to me for some reason... always follow your gut people... if it tells you somethings off about someone, its usually right. the schemegelsky guy screams "psyco" the other dude is your typical wierdo… very offputting.

its happening in stages... whether it will succeed...? time will tell. vegans have found a powerful niche in the left movement. and they are pushing their agenda very effectively.. it starts with legislation (which we have seen) . it continues with celebrities embracing the lifestyle to advance their careers by scoring browny points with the left. Then promiment people who have the audacity to eat meat in public get harassed and shamed into submission for fear of losing their status. Schools start to propagate the benefits of the lifestyle. then its only a matter of time before leftist teachers start banning their students from packing meat lunches... as they will scream its against global warming, its murder, it offends vegans and vegan meals are healthier anyway... so how dare that evil child abusing parent pack their kid a turkey sandwhich…... then meat gets banned from menus of prominent people, schools, etc.... and were well on our way... whether it succeeds or not only time will tell. but its definitely the direction were heading and its following the same step by step game leftists use to socially engineer their ideology into society.

that is the single most annoying angle they use..... there is a difference between a pet and a random animal. dogs are especially unique in the sense that they have evolved around humans in 1 way or another. and are extremely dependent on them... dogs and their owners also bond in a scientifically proven chemical bond that a person usually shares with their child...….. But.... they are the same as lobsters for people pushing an agenda... this is why vegans are annoying. their holier than thou attitude is disgusting..... im sorri me intelligent vegan friend. mi only have grade 5 education and illiterate. me eat meat. me caveman you soy very much advanced. please lead way soy intelligent man. its funny how you ignore all the insults from other side but get offended by a simple generalization. I am positive that there are many good vegans around. but the issue is the movement as a whole is no longer content on living their own lifestyle. but they have shifted into trying to harass, legislate, and shame others into following their lifestyle. even Canadas new food guide is ideologically driven pro-vegan propaganda. this is a sad story we have seen many times.... its only a matter of time before eating meat becomes taboo for someone in polite society....this is getting out of hand.

vegans are the most annoying group of people on earth. period. and hypocrital since they eat bread and beer. Yet millions of insects die in mass cultivation of wheat. Their standards for animal rights only apply to the cute and cuddly ones. insects get no love.

another rich man manages to game the system long enough to escape justice.... absolutely SHOCKING.

money is not the only thing. but try telling that to someone losing their job, their livelihood, their ability to provide for their family ,and their sense of self worth/respect. then you can begin to grasp there are more then 1 side to the debate. nothing irritates people in that camp more then out touch urban dwellers who don't have to bear any of the impact. aggressilvely trying to give them holier than thou virtue signalling lectures. and trying to brand them as evil ,selfish et etc.... you can eat meat and still respect animals. the two are not exclusive. except the aggressive vegan tactics of trying to shame people into falling in line. I have 2 dogs I love to death, but eat meat and have no problem with rodeos.. a lot of peoples livelihood, culture depends on it. these horses are getting a second chance to compete (otherwise they would be going to the slaughterhouse) they are taken care of as family by their owners. and unfortunately a few die doing their job. This doesn't mean everyone in this industry is evil , and the whole thing should be shut down.. this smug liberal attitude is what turns people off and entrenches people into separate camps. 1.6%. look at that number. that is Canada's entire carbon by world percentage (and its decreasing) If the entire country of Canada disappeared from the face of the earth it wouldn't make a dent into "global warming". take that into perspective before advocating people stop existing for higher virtue signalling causes soyboys like to lecture people on. ive personally had it with soyboys, and have little respect for them. personally. out of touch hippies who have never worked an honest day intheir life and don't have a clue what responsibility is. they think money is magic and unlimited and only if they complain enough they can get their needs taken care of by the government. sickening

…….

soyboys always try to impose their lifestyle onto others. Alberta is already being suffocated economically by the save the world crowd. now the save the animal crowd wants to shut down a cultural icon of Calgary and a huge economic booster at a time of a depressed (thanks largely to the same crew) economy. im sure alberta will be all over it. Lead the way urban dwelling soyboys of BC and elsewhere.

also how do you guys know the crowd intended to beat him to death? it doesn't take much for someone to die really.. 1 or 2 head shots can easily be fatal... maybe the crowd is a hero who stopped this dangerous criminal. and in a struggle some people got a good couple shots in and karma caught up to him? people didn't go in and in a pre-meditated fashion drag the guy out of his house and lynch him. it was a heat of the moment thing. and the consequences can easily be blamed on the perp if one wants to speculate.

what I think is firstly if the kids are ok. hopefully they are young enough not to be permenantly scarred by this terryfing kidnapping. secondly, I wish the parents would get questioned for their dumb decisions. leaving kids in a running car is something child protection should look into.... Now waaaaaaay down the priority list... somewhere far behind the next time I go to the toilet... there might be a small consideration and a half tear for the poor carjacker/ kidnapper who was denied justice. while you speculate on his mental health to make excuses, others might be thinking that someone doesn't just wake up one day and go carjacking and kidnapping for their first crime. you generally have to be a big piece of $&!# and have done a lot crap you got away with to get to this point in life (if one wants to play the speculation game )

i think its conditioning as a society that no matter what you. its never your fault and there is always some other evil to blame. i think that's where a lot of this comes from if i were to guess... its always mental health this. and its the governments fault for not spending enough on it. its societies fault for letting this person down so he just had to go to that store and shoot a clerk to death..... etc.etc…. im not condoning mob justice either. but made a general point of leftists defending criminals in every situation.. you kind of proved me right here. as you know nothing of the case but are making excuses as to you a man would be justified in stealing a car and potentially kidnapping 3 young children in.....

the knee jerk reaction by a lot leftists is ALWAYS to try and find a way to sympathize with the perpetator of a crime. regardless of how gruesome it is.... you can literally behead a man and eat him on a bus and there will be hoards of holier than thou liberals lecturing you about the need to protect the cannibal while COMPLETELY ignoring the victim, and their family. I really don't know the reason either.

so just because were a little better off then possibly the worse owner in professional sports?? we should be happy? Melnyks gotten Ottawa to a couple of finals as well by the way. a real owner makes a sacrifice in revenue for 4-5 years for the long term interests of the franchise. this is where aquilini differed from the world (including linden) he even fired nonis for the exact same reason early on when nonis wouldn't sacrifice the future for a playoff shot. aquilini wants to make the playoffs. playoffs are pure gravy in revenue terms for owners. they no longer have to pay salary and rake in multi-millions of pure profit from bloated ticket sales and other revenue streams during the playoffs. that's aquilinis priority. getting this team into the playoffs. as 50 years of cup-less failure have proven. The canucks need a long term rebuild plan with a single minded vision of going for the cup. im in my early 30s and honestly have resigned myself to the fact that I may never see the canucks win a cup in my lifetime.... there is no hope with this team.. at least if you had torn it apart and went for a full rebuild people would have more hope. 50 years no cup and were not even close. how much more hopeless then that can you get?

I really don't understand what your talking about...

until the aquilinis own this team. and their priority remains playoff revenue.... this team will keep chasing its tail for another 50 cup-less years. the worst types of sports owners are the ones that see it as a business (Rather then a side hobby, passion). if this team had gone thru a proper rebuild that the whole world was calling for in the Tortorella era.... we would be a cup contender by now.

I did hear about it and don't know every single detail I must admit. But I was just going under the premise that regardless of what he did, there is no circumstance that it becomes ok to attempt murder on somebody by mutiliating them in a grotesque way.... in your books apparently there are circumstances where this is not only permitted but comedic? we can agree to disagree on that. but I am curious though does this standard only apply to men? in the spirit of fairness. there are a lot of nasty woman out there doing a lot of nasty things. what does a woman have to do to deserve arbitrarily getting mutiliated while they are sleep? and especially in a fashion that's "funny"? very interested in knowing...… you must also find bubba jokes to be funny as well if I were to take a personal guess?

if she was being raped or beaten. the proper place to go would be the police, not stay with your rapist for a long time. only to arbitrarily decide one day when hes sleep to try and cut off his penis. that Is ridiculous. and not in the least bit funny.

fear karma...…

I remember the severed penis story... what always shocked me though is how everyone saw it as a comedic thing. attempted murder on a sleeping man with possible life long mutilation is comedy..... even sexual assault on men is comedy. as the epidemic of rapes in prison is not only ignored, but society finds it ok to make light of with bubba jokes. now change the word "man" to "woman" and watch how the reaction would be.

not really. didn't watch a single game and couldn't care to (even though im a huge soccer fan) the whole punk like celebrations, and the entire feminist, lesbian, protesting against the world man hating atmosphere really turned me off. an average high school boys soccer team routinely beats the best womens soccer team by wide margins (9-0) when they train together (in no contact games nonetheless) its hard to take a sport seriously when they play at lower levels then a highschooler but have the ego of LeBron james and christiano Ronaldo combined.

this just one example of many. every single time a feminist gets criticized. its always the exact same pattern. somehow its a mans fault, society is sexist against her, and shes a victim. those simple rules. doesn't matter if the feminist was caught red handedwith a bloody machete on a crime scene. she will repeat that excuse with currency.