Standing_Tall#37 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 I'd take all three of them if the price was right and my 42 years of being a Canuck fan would have no issues with it whatsoever. You might want to look up the popular phrase concerning the logo on the front of the jersey and the name on the back.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 It's amazing how forgiving and forgetful some people on here are. It's not just what he says, it's his actions too. I see him taking cheap shots at players all game long. He is a disgrace to hockey. A lot of people turned on Kesler after last year's playoffs, it would only take a week for them to realize how stupid it is to have bolland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Let me use an analogy here. You come catch your handyman banging your wife....you and her work things out stay together. 2 years later that same handyman wants to rent a room in your house. Are you saying you would do it because the house would stay in better shape? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex the Great Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Yes. One eyed Manny is exactly what the doctor ordered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pghockeyguy Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 The sedin's have cell phones too! I'm sure Gillis can give them a shout and ask them what they think about adding Bolland to the mix? I'm sure they would say they would rather be playing with him then against him. Just think of another playoff series where bolland is running around agitating the hell out of toews and kane, that would be fun to watch. What would be even better would be watching how many times the canucks would fake shots wait for lou to fall on his face and bury it top cheese! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Standing_Tall#37 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 I wouldn't let him, he would probably bang her again when your not home. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schmanky Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Bolland's a flat tire.... good for nuthin'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sedin's 6th Sense Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Dave Bolland is exactly what this team needs! Big body, hard working for-checker that chips in and elevates his game in the playoffs. It would not take long to except him in the locker room. If you think the Sedin's are going to be mad or not except him your crazy. Hank and Dank are stand up dude's this is pro hockey they will embrace him as a teammate and move forward. I will take a hard working physical player scoring 40+ points in a second although I would prefer Stalberg. You have to remember Canucks fans hate Dave Bolland for a reason. Because he did exactly what he wanted to against us. It sure would be nice having him on our side doing that to the other teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenSurgeon Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 What happened to the unwritten rule that you should never trade within your own conference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaMacNamedDre Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Dave Bolland is vile scum, would rather take Patrick Sharp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RBCanucks Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Seriously you would rather have Manny then Bolland? Manny 78 gms 7g 11a -11 born in 1980 Bolland 76 gms 19g 18a +0 born in 1986 Besides that They don't even compare because Bolland is a 3rd liner and Manny is a 4th liner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucksnhl Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 99% of the posts on this bored are full of Idiocy just trying to fit in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonshinefe Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Gillis has said in interviews before he expects players coming in to have a VERY high level of character both on and off the ice. He also stated he asks players around the dressing room about their attitude on potential people coming in before making his decisions. Ergo, Bolland is never, ever coming here, period. There's no point even speculating about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CmdrAdama Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Hell No, I would rather bring Messier back to our organization than get Bolland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jai604 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 accept* As in no way does Vancouver accept a trade that brings Bolland here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Wow. So you were around when the Canucks first came into the league? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gumballthechewy Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 canucks players would have no problem acquiring bolland because they're grown men who don't hold childish grudges over meaningless words, and because he would make the team better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbyte Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 You'd rather have Stalberg? You're mental man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 0.o Please re-think that argument for a minute... lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Let me use an analogy here. You come catch your handyman banging your wife....you and her work things out stay together. 2 years later that same handyman wants to rent a room in your house. Are you saying you would do it because the house would stay in better shape? Some things are unforgivable...I would hope the Canucks organization would have a little more dignity than that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.