Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Report] Kane considering six-year, $29 million deal from Jets


Recommended Posts

lol. Listing players that broke out AFTER they signed their existing contracts does nothing to prove Kane is worth less in todays market. If you want to evaluate fair market value, you need to look at the contracts being signed in the current market.

Matt Carle - 5.5M.

Wideman - 5.25M

Garrison - 4.6M

Jagr - 4.55M

Selanne - 4.5M

O.Jokinen - 4.5M

R.Whitney - 4.5M

Hudler - 4M

Kane in 2012/13 is already worth more than all of these guys, and he's 20 years old. In 3-4 years (which Winnipeg is trying to include in the deal) to insinutate he's only a 4-5M player is insulting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offer sheets don't work!

You get the message to Kane that we'd want him, he waits till he's a UFA give give him our best offer

or

work out a trade with the Jets, let them know Kane will bolt once he's a UFA so better get something now than see a scenario like Suter, Hamhuis et al...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offer sheets don't work!

You get the message to Kane that we'd want him, he waits till he's a UFA give give him our best offer

or

work out a trade with the Jets, let them know Kane will bolt once he's a UFA so better get something now than see a scenario like Suter, Hamhuis et al...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not in this market. He is an RFA.

EDIT: Also there's the fact that he's not a 4-5M player now. Everybody believes he will be in 3-4 years, and I'm sure that that's how it's going to be structured. He'll be getting less than 4.8 to start, and he'll get more in 3-4 years. 4.8 is very fair and other than Crosby/Ovechkin I don't think there's been a whole lot of 20 year olds to get that sort of offer.

He will be a 4-5+ million dollar man, but he has yet to show consistency at this level. The Jets are paying more than what he's worth now in the hope that he will develop into the player they expect him to be. I believe that this is a very fair deal and that at his age he should be happy to have it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Looks like Jamie Benn is in a similar situation, as reported by Mike Heika,

http://starsblog.dallasnews.com/2012/08/try-to-look-at-cba-talks-as-a-single-contract-negotiation.html/

Clearly, Benn’s agent wants as much money as he can get for his client. He understands the parameters of the current CBA, he understands what similar players are making in the league, and he understands what Benn wants, which is likely as much security as he can get, as well as the option to really hit a home run should he become one of the best players in the league. That’s why Benn would love a five-year deal that would average around $6 million a season and would make him an unrestricted free agent at the age of 27. That would make his life perfect.

The Stars would like to be 100 percent sure that Benn is the real deal before they enter into a long-term guaranteed contract with him, so they see players such as Claude Giroux or James Neal or Loui Eriksson sign two or three-year deals that pay handsomely (between $3-$4 million) and set them up for a long-term contract negotiation as a restricted free agent before they reach unrestricted free agency. The Stars would see that as the perfect scenario.

So both sides sit and wait until the pressue of the season or the information of the next CBA helps stoke the negotiations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you people think? The Jets have like 18 milllion in cap space. Do you really think they wouldn't match anything the Canucks would throw at him?

All you would be doing is ruining your relationship with the Jets, and possibly other GMs around the league who hate offer sheets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's THESE contracts that will be the reason for a lockout. People think its the Weber, Suter, Parise... Etc deals that are bad (they are high don't get me wrong) but its the 20, 21 yr olds coming off their ELCs wanting 5-6 mill a year that are throwing the pay scales out of whack.

And the same people that b!tch about not wanting a lockout are the same ones saying Winnipeg's offer is a lowball offer and that Kane should be offended

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's THESE contracts that will be the reason for a lockout. People think its the Weber, Suter, Parise... Etc deals that are bad (they are high don't get me wrong) but its the 20, 21 yr olds coming off their ELCs wanting 5-6 mill a year that are throwing the pay scales out of whack.

And the same people that b!tch about not wanting a lockout are the same ones saying Winnipeg's offer is a lowball offer and that Kane should be offended

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope we sign doan.. But would it not be wiser to send a front loaded offer sheet to Dallas/Jets for Kane/Benn of 7 years 45 million and get a young up and coming power foward/ possible superstar??? Jets/stars would be hard pressed to match if you made them pay out 20-25 million in the first 2 years? and its unlikely we pick up anyone close to these to players with are 1st rounders that we would have to give up..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...