Brady vs. Manning with 1 game to play:
Brady: 379/601 (63.1%), 4685 yards (7.79 y/att), 32 TD, 8 INT (75.1 att/INT), 98.3 QB Rating
Manning: 377/554 (68.1%), 4355 yards (7.86 y/att), 34 TD, 11 INT(50.3 att/INT), 103.7 QB Rating
Brady has a better INT ratio. Other than that, Manning has the edge in every other category.
Also forgetting the fact that Manning has a much better defence than Brady and that Brady is the sole reason why the Pats have a good record year in year out. Our defence is atrocious and our secondary is comparable to a high school football team when they stink. And our running game ain't that great either which is why Brady has to throw 50+ times a game.
Ravens were written off when the injury big hit them early in the season, everyone wrote them off, they still reeled off win after win, even missing key players on D they rose to the occasion and played their hearts out. I believe in my team, shoulda been in the Super Bowl last year as even Brady admitted they were lucky to beat the Ravens. There are still some injuries to recover from, and even upfront now with Boldin going down, but Lewis will be back for the playoffs, and that adds a whole new dimension to the defence. Flacco is a good QB, sometimes great, he's now 27, still young and entering the prime of his career. I dont have his jersey for no reason y'know GO RAVENS!!!! #SevenNationArmy
They wouldn't have won if the refs haven't been so Raven biased. Talk about overrated.
And Brady admiting that we were lucky to beat the Ravens is because our defence can't do jack to save our lives.
Edited by Markus Alexander Cody, 24 December 2012 - 01:55 AM.