Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

Proposal Van-NYI Van-Tor


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 kanucks1

kanucks1

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,428 posts
  • Joined: 14-July 12

Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:39 PM

To Van: Matt Moulson, Kyle Okposo,Hamonic,

To Isles: Edler, Hansen,Raymond,Ballard,2nd 2013

Why?

Our Canucks get two top six fowards and a depth d.

Isles also get two top six fowards,one who needs a change in scenary (Raymond), a star d-man in his prime, and a top four d-man and high pick.

To Van: Phaneuf

To Tor: Luongo,Sauve,Rodin



Lineup

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Moulson-Kesler-Booth
Okposo-Lapierre-Kassian
HIggins-Manny-Weise
Volpatti-Ebbett

Phaneuf-Garisson
Hamhuis-Bieksa
Hamonic-Tanev




PCuzz

Edited by kanucks1, 30 September 2012 - 05:57 PM.

  • 0
Posted Image


CDC Fantasy League GM Chicago Blackhawks

#2 CanucksFanMike

CanucksFanMike

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,632 posts
  • Joined: 28-September 11

Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:44 PM

Neither team does the first one
the second one i wouldn't do only because i am not a fan of Phaneuf.... he is overpayed, overrated, and very cocky

Edited by CanucksFanMike, 30 September 2012 - 06:24 PM.

  • 0
Posted Image
Credit to -Vintage Canuck-

#3 Pears

Pears

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,352 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11

Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:45 PM

Not a chance in hell the Islanders do that. They already lost one top six forward this off season in Parenteau, so why in the world would want to give up two more? Who fills in the holes? Hansen is NOT a top six forward and and does not need a change of scenery, not sure why you think he does. Raymond is not a top six forward anymore either.

Edited by Steven Stamkos' Mullet, 30 September 2012 - 05:47 PM.

  • 0

In my eyes drouin is overrated he can score in the qmjhl but did nothing in last two gold medal games that canada lost. Fox will be better pro than him talk to me in five yrs

Gaudreau has one NHL goal whereas all your "prized" prospects have none.

   ryan kesler is going to the chicago blackhawks ...       quote me on it


#4 kanucks1

kanucks1

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,428 posts
  • Joined: 14-July 12

Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:58 PM

I think it's good.
  • 0
Posted Image


CDC Fantasy League GM Chicago Blackhawks

#5 Froggy Fresh

Froggy Fresh

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,928 posts
  • Joined: 05-June 09

Posted 30 September 2012 - 06:00 PM

I think it's good.


That's probably why it's terrible.
  • 1

Posted Image


Credit to (>'-')> for the amazing sig!


#6 kanucks1

kanucks1

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,428 posts
  • Joined: 14-July 12

Posted 30 September 2012 - 06:07 PM

That's probably why it's terrible.


HAHAHA!
  • 0
Posted Image


CDC Fantasy League GM Chicago Blackhawks

#7 Pears

Pears

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,352 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11

Posted 30 September 2012 - 06:08 PM

HAHAHA!

He is right you know.
  • 0

In my eyes drouin is overrated he can score in the qmjhl but did nothing in last two gold medal games that canada lost. Fox will be better pro than him talk to me in five yrs

Gaudreau has one NHL goal whereas all your "prized" prospects have none.

   ryan kesler is going to the chicago blackhawks ...       quote me on it


#8 elvis15

elvis15

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,175 posts
  • Joined: 27-February 07

Posted 30 September 2012 - 07:03 PM

To Van: Matt Moulson, Kyle Okposo,Hamonic,

To Isles: Edler, Hansen,Raymond,Ballard,2nd 2013

Why?

Our Canucks get two top six fowards and a depth d.

Isles also get two top six fowards,one who needs a change in scenary (Raymond), a star d-man in his prime, and a top four d-man and high pick.

So let me get this straight by your reasoning.
Van gets:
2x top 6 forwards
1x depth D

Van gives:
2x top 6 forwards
1x star D-man
1x top 4 D-man
1x high pick

Maybe my math is off, but that does not look like a good deal. That's because it isn't, even if you correct for the more reasonable values of those players.

To Van: Phaneuf

To Tor: Luongo,Sauve,Rodin

This one doesn't get any better, with us giving away Luongo and two prospects for a D-man that we don't want. Phaneuf is more than the chump some on CDC make him out to be, but he's not who we'd go after and he's certainly not worth that much to us.
  • 0

c3c9e9.pnganimalhousesig.jpg

Tanev is going to EDM. I can put my life savings down on it

 


#9 Tom Sestito

Tom Sestito

    Probably Not A Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,082 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 12

Posted 30 September 2012 - 07:07 PM

To Van: Matt Moulson, Kyle Okposo,Hamonic,

To Isles: Edler, Hansen,Raymond,Ballard,2nd 2013

Why?

Our Canucks get two top six fowards and a depth d.

Isles also get two top six fowards,one who needs a change in scenary (Raymond), a star d-man in his prime, and a top four d-man and high pick.

To Van: Phaneuf

To Tor: Luongo,Sauve,Rodin



Lineup

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Moulson-Kesler-Booth
Okposo-Lapierre-Kassian
HIggins-Manny-Weise
Volpatti-Ebbett

Phaneuf-Garisson
Hamhuis-Bieksa
Hamonic-Tanev




PCuzz

To Isles: Edler, Hansen,Raymond,Ballard,2nd 2013
LOl okay there bud.
I think you mean an inconsistent, but growing top pair d-man who is young and can score, a workhorse 3rd liner, an underachieving 3rd liner, an overpayed 4-5th defenceman, but when ballard is playing great, he's amazing, and a pick.
  • 0
Posted Image
Thank you VC!

#10 Jägermeister

Jägermeister

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,786 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 12

Posted 30 September 2012 - 07:36 PM

Islanders wouldn't make the 1st deal.
We wouldn't do the 2nd. I like Phaneuf but he isn't worth that.
  • 1
Posted Image

#11 SkeeterHansen

SkeeterHansen

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,140 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 11

Posted 30 September 2012 - 07:39 PM

You belong in the Trade Proposal Hall of Shame

You and theres_a_can_in_canucks...
  • 1

/=S=/


#12 Hamhuis2

Hamhuis2

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,881 posts
  • Joined: 07-July 11

Posted 30 September 2012 - 07:52 PM

In what world is Hamonic a depth defenseman? The kid is there best d man already and is still really young. I still say no though.
  • 0
Chicago Blackhawks NHL 14 OCDC League 2013/2014

J. Schultz(81)-Toews(92)-Pacioretty(88)....Keith(90)-Phaneuf(87)................Crawford(86)
Burns(87)-Kadri(85)-Yakupov(83)..............Hjalmarson(85)-N. Schultz(84)....Khabby(76)
Clarkson(83)-Zibanejad(80)-Ennis(82).......Koska(78)-Murray(83)
Kobasew(78)-Hanszus(79)-Morin(76)

#13 kanucks1

kanucks1

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,428 posts
  • Joined: 14-July 12

Posted 01 October 2012 - 08:04 AM

People, it's just a proposal, it's not like the trade ever happened.
  • 0
Posted Image


CDC Fantasy League GM Chicago Blackhawks

#14 elvis15

elvis15

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,175 posts
  • Joined: 27-February 07

Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:41 AM

People, it's just a proposal, it's not like the trade ever happened.

Or that it would, considering the replies.

The point of the proposals forum is to try and make a realistic trade. If it's not realistic, expect some replies telling you as such.
  • 0

c3c9e9.pnganimalhousesig.jpg

Tanev is going to EDM. I can put my life savings down on it

 


#15 Tortorella's Rant

Tortorella's Rant

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,207 posts
  • Joined: 11-April 12

Posted 01 October 2012 - 10:31 AM

That's probably why it's terrible.


*insert Kelso burn gif here*
  • 0
Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.