• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      All Threads Must Contain Tags!   07/25/2017

      ALL THREADS MUST CONTAIN TAGS   All threads in this forum must contain tags prefixed to topic titles. The purpose of the tags is to eliminate confusion in recent threads lists, and to create an organized and consistent environment. Moderators may immediately lock and thread that does not contain tags.    Tags must be placed at the start of your thread title, following this exact formatting:    [Tag] Thread Title   Here are some of the most used popular tags:    [Proposal]
      A trade, or trades, for next season, or even the off-season.
      [Off-Season]
      FA signings, off-season trades for RFA's, UFA's rights etc...
      [Value Of]
      (A question regarding a players worth, whether from another team, or the Canucks)
      [Speculation] Posting a rumor (with a source of course), but providing why it could be possible for the Canucks to land that player.   [Discussion]
      Thoughts on team trading strategy and composition.   Please feel free to create your own tag if none of these suit your thread.   

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Mr. White

Lineup Changes for Wednesday

Recommended Posts

He are a couple changes I think we should make for Wednesday's game vs. the Flames.

1) Put Kassian with the Sedins for the whole game. He looked good last night so I would give him another shot. Put Burr on the 2nd line with Higgins and Hansen

2) Give Schroeder a chance. Take out Ebbett or Volpatti for a game and at least give the guy a shot, he deserves it and you never know.

3) Ballard out, Barker in. Ballard still looks like the turnover machine we all know. Give Cam Barker a chance.

Lineups:

Sedin - Sedin - Kassian

Hansen - Higgins - Burrows (Could put Schroeder on the 2nd line in place of Higgins)

Raymond - Schroeder - Lappy

Weise - Manny - Ebbett (Volpatti)

Hammer - Juice

Garrison - Eddy

Barker - Tanev

Schneider

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sedin - Sedin - Kassian

Raymond - Schroeder - Burrows

Higgins - Lapierre - Hansen

Volpatti - Malhotra - Weise

Hamhuis - Bieksa

Garrison - Edler

Ballard - Tanev

Schneider

Luongo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

raymond has shown me nothing, he still is falling down with no one around him. I mean i wish him all the best but why is he on the second line over higgins or hansen? Both of those players are grittier, and finish their checks. Once we have a healthy lineup I dont really see raymond fitting in on our top 9. He needs to produce or he is gonna be traded or we will let him walk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sedin - Sedin - Kassian

Higgins - Schroeder - Burrows

Raymond - Lapierre - Hansen

Volpatti - Malhotra - Weise

Hamhuis - Bieksa

Garrison - Edler

Barker-Alberts

Schneider

Luongo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i thought our 3rd line was pretty solid so i dont think breaking them up is a good idea. our 4th line is playing way too much.

D.Sedin-H.Sedin-Burrows

Raymond-Schroeder-Kassian

Higgins-Lapierre-Hansen

Volpatti-Malholtra-Ebbett/Weise

Bieksa-Hamhuis

Edler-Garrison

Ballard-Tanev

Schneider(he needs to have a good game, i would have played him against Edmonton personally, Luongo played great but Schneids needs to learn how to bounce back from a bad game.)

another question: What will the Lineup look like when Kesler and Booth are healthy?

D.Sedin-H.Sedin-Burrows

Booth-Kesler-Raymond(?)-Hes a good backchecker and he has been playing decent.Not as bad as everyone is saying

Higgins-Lapierre-Hansen-I really like this line, i think they are doing pretty good tbh, wouldn't break them up.

Volpatti/Weise-Malholtra-Kassian(?)-if the 4th line continues to play 10+ min i think it wont be that bad for his development.

Bieksa-Hamhuis

Edler-Garrison-Edler has been ouyr best player imo.

Ballard-Tanev-I want to see what Barker can do so i would play him pretty soon

Schneider

Luongo-No rush to move him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sedin-Sedin-Kassian

Raymond-Schroeder-Burrows

Higgins-Lapierre-Hansen

Volpatti-Ebbett-Weise

Bieksa-Hamhuis

Edler-Garrison

Tanev-Barker

Luongo

Schneider

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sedin - Sedin - Kassian

Burrows - Schroeder - Higgins

Raymond - Lapierre - Hansen

Volpatti - Malhotra - Weise

Hamhuis - Bieksa

Edler - Garrison

Barker - Tanev

Schneider

Luongo

Ballard has played decent but Barker should play a game every now and then

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sedin-Sedin-Kassian

Higgins-Lapierre-Burrows

Hansen-Schroeder-Raymond

Weise-Malhotra-Volpatti

Juice-Hammer

Edler-Garrison

Tanev-Barker

Schneider

Lu

I don't want to see them switch up the 4th. That line has had great energy and really looked strong in both games

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1) Recall Jensen from Europe

2) Use magic wand to instantly heal Kesler

3) Trade Luo for Backes

1A -Sedin - Sedin - Jensen

1B -Booth - Kesler - Backes

3A -Burrows - Lapierre - Kassian

3B -Hansen - Malhotra - Higgins

Raymond

Bieksa - Hamhuis

Edler - Garrison

Tanev - Ballard

Barker

Schneider

Lack

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1) Recall Jensen from Europe

2) Use magic wand to instantly heal Kesler

3) Trade Luo for Backes

1A -Sedin - Sedin - Jensen

1B -Booth - Kesler - Backes

3A -Burrows - Lapierre - Kassian

3B -Hansen - Malhotra - Higgins

Raymond

Bieksa - Hamhuis

Edler - Garrison

Tanev - Ballard

Barker

Schneider

Lack

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sedin - Sedin - Kassian

Raymond - Schroeder - Burrows

Higgins - Lapierre - Hansen

Volpatti - Malhotra - Weise

Hamhuis - Bieksa

Garrison - Edler

Ballard - Tanev

Schneider

Luongo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Omg your actually a genius !!!

Trade Luongo to a St. Louis team who has a goalie controversy going on already with two goalies already . (Halak and Elliot)

You actually better be joking, because that is the stupidest proposal I have seen!

Thank you for reminding me why I shouldn't visit this Forum topics (Proposals and Arm-chair GMing)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So out of all 3 points I mentioned, you found trading Luo for Backes to be the most outlandish and unrealistic?

I'm feeling quite sad for this Harry Potter generation now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I only dismissed the first two points due to the fact that they were blaintely idiotic.

The last point seems to correspond with some of the other horrendous trade proposals I see day after day in these threads. I only highlighted it to clear up any seriousness in that post if there was any.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sedin-Sedin-Kassian

Higgins-Schroeder-Burrows

Hansen-LaPierre-Wiese

Raymond-Malhotra-Volpatti

Edler-Garrison

Hamhuis-Bieksa

Barker-Alberts

Schnieder

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.