-Vintage Canuck- Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Bruce Boudreau red hot after a controversial non-goal: During Bruce Boudreau‘s four months here, we’ve learned that he is entertaining. And fiery. The Ducks’ coach displayed both traits after an emotional 3-2 loss to Boston on Sunday, saying he had to fight the urge to punch Rob Martell, one of the game’s referees. The Ducks were upset when Matt Beleskey‘s apparent tying goal midway through the third period was disallowed because Andrew Cogliano was in the crease. Asked what Martell told him by way of explanation, Boudreau, who confronted the official near the bench, said, “Well, I didn’t really give him much of a chance to say too much. I was ready to hit him.” More Boudreau: “What do you want me to say? It cost us. It cost us the game. Sure they got another goal, but, I mean, we would have played completely different if it was a 2-2 tie with 10 minutes to go. “I don’t know. I give up trying to figure these guys out.” Other than that, it was a pretty uninteresting night at Honda Center. http://ducks.ocregis...hit-him/108723/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Magician Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 I have to fight this urge every game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lateralus Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 It was the right call. NHL Rule 69: Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Aerosex Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 It was the right call. NHL Rule 69: http://www.nhl.com/i...ge.htm?id=26480 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pimpcurtly Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 I think that's a crappy call and don't blame Bruce for being pissed. The ref 10 feet away said it was a good goal. He saw that Turco wasn't touched or impeded from making the save in any way. Sometimes that outside ref just needs to shut the hell up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.Kesler #17 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Bettman and the refs should be fired. Need new hired ones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xbox Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Its Boston. What do you expect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tanev Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 It was the right call. NHL Rule 69: http://www.nhl.com/i...ge.htm?id=26480 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 LOL. If I were Boudreau I would've gone and freaking roundhoused the ref. That was such a pathetic call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denguin Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Make goalie interference calls reviewable. Problem solved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AbbyNucksFan Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 wow, that was a bad bad bad call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted March 26, 2012 Author Share Posted March 26, 2012 LOL. If I were Boudreau I would've gone and freaking roundhoused the ref. That was such a pathetic call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haikara Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 It was the right call. NHL Rule 69: http://www.nhl.com/i...ge.htm?id=26480 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aixtek Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Weak call. If I was a Ducks fan I'd say the refs lost us the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vigneault's Timeout Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 I think it's an iffy call because I haven't seen Turco make one nice save since his return to the NHL with the B's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flapjacks Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 I love Boudreau's emotions haha. There didn't seem to be any contact with Turco, and even so, I don't see how his movement could have been restricted if the player was on Turco's left and the puck went in on his right. That's just me though. Too bad for the Ducks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hank Moody Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 It's tough. I'm a goalie and if Cogliano was where I was, even though there is no contact, it impedes me from being able to outstretch my arm and leg to where he is standing, and therefore I see where the refs come in. one thing I have to say though is thank you Turco for not making a huge scene. He just let the refs do their job and that's it. He stood there and watched, didn't pull the whole Osgood-esque dive around the crease followed by 45 seconds of spitting at the ref Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gran Turismo Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 But the ref initially called it a good goal. I thought situations like these were non-reviewable, making the call irreversible. Unless I'm mistaken? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaBestPlaceOnEarth Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Didn't touch him, but in the ref's defense Turco sold it pretty good and he was technically in the crease. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pierre's Personal Bubble Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Rule 69 blows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.