JimLahey Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 Pretty happy to bring in the free agents I have, including uncreated prospects which have signed. Pending any other signings, the Flames and Heat roster are complete. PA Parenteau, Mark Streit, Dennis Wideman and Raffi Torres are all available for the right price. Calgary Flames Mikael Backlund - Artem Anisimov - Sven Baertschi Joe Colborne - Marcus Kruger - PA Parenteau Curtis Glencross - Samuel Pahlsson - Troy Brouwer Raffi Torres - Adam Burish - Blake Comeau -Mitch Wahl Mark Streit - Mark Fistric Tim Erixon - Dennis Wideman Chris Campoli - Mark Fayne -Jerome-Gauthier Leduc Miikka Kiprusoff Ben Scrivens Abbotsford Heat John Gaudreau - Mark Jankowski - Anton Zlobin Marcus Granlund - Max Reinhart - Jordan Maletta Michael Ferland - Jared McCann - Ryan Howse Logan MacMillan - Bill Arnold - Bobby Butler -Casey Pierro Zabotel Morgan Rielly - TJ Brodie Tyler Wotherspoon - Brenden Kichton Brett Kulak - Pat Sieloff -Brian Dumoulin Leland Irving Laurent Brossoit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 Yeah VC I think the exhaustion levels for goalies needs to be looked at. I split my tendies nearly 50/50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dion Phaneuf Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 No goalie should play more than 70 games IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nail Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 http://tinychat.com/sths Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*VaNcOuVeRCaNuCkS* Posted May 16, 2013 Author Share Posted May 16, 2013 Yeah VC I think the exhaustion levels for goalies needs to be looked at. I split my tendies nearly 50/50. Right now I have it set at 35 Shots - 1 condition 40 Shots - 2 condition 45 Shots - 3 condition removed Every day advanced in the simulator they gain back 1 condition Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AriGold Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Curious question, did nobody else offer on Seidenberg ? I'm so confused why he signed with a team in the condition it is currently in. 2 top 2 Defenseman which makes him #3, 75M in salary prior to his contract, has 7 NHL d already signed prior to Seidenberg. For the record I didn't make a offer on Seidenberg, I'm just very confused how Nashville got him ? Gotta assume nobody else offered for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimLahey Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 ^ I know both MGK and I sent offers for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
logic Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Curious question, did nobody else offer on Seidenberg ? I'm so confused why he signed with a team in the condition it is currently in. 2 top 2 Defenseman which makes him #3, 75M in salary prior to his contract, has 7 NHL d already signed prior to Seidenberg. For the record I didn't make a offer on Seidenberg, I'm just very confused how Nashville got him ? Gotta assume nobody else offered for him. Yeah I did, I offered top 2 money. That's the one thing about STHS, is its kind of hard for rebuilding teams to get help through FA because most of the time the rich get richer. Although I did get Klesla, and Jokinen so I'm not going to rant to much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket. Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 No goalie should play more than 70 games IMO. I second that - 70 is just right. Don't want to take anything away from teams who have star goalies, but I think we have to make it somewhat realistic and 70 is a solid max Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otis Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Curious question, did nobody else offer on Seidenberg ? I'm so confused why he signed with a team in the condition it is currently in. 2 top 2 Defenseman which makes him #3, 75M in salary prior to his contract, has 7 NHL d already signed prior to Seidenberg. For the record I didn't make a offer on Seidenberg, I'm just very confused how Nashville got him ? Gotta assume nobody else offered for him. This is what happens when people just like to comment by looking as an outsider. Dennis wanted to play with two of the best defensemen in hockey and we wanted him. You manage your team I will mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BananaMash Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AriGold Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 This is what happens when people just like to comment by looking as an outsider. Dennis wanted to play with two of the best defensemen in hockey and we wanted him. You manage your team I will mine. Yes master I will listen to you at once master.. Phh.. Yeah right. I will ask any freaking question I wish.. I found the signing odd.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Right now I have it set at 35 Shots - 1 condition 40 Shots - 2 condition 45 Shots - 3 condition removed Every day advanced in the simulator they gain back 1 condition We should go with something like: 25 shots - 1 CON 30 shots - 2 CON 35 shots - 3 CON 40+ shots 5 CON then 1 CON per day that way someone can't run a goalie for an entire season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BananaMash Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 We should go with something like: 25 shots - 1 CON 30 shots - 2 CON 35 shots - 3 CON 40+ shots 5 CON then 1 CON per day that way someone can't run a goalie for an entire season. 5 might be a little bit much for 40+. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otis Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Yes master I will listen to you at once master.. Phh.. Yeah right. I will ask any freaking question I wish.. I found the signing odd.. Blah blah blah. I defended my point of view deal with it champ. Clearly you didn't want Seidenberg so why do you care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AriGold Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Blah blah blah. I defended my point of view deal with it champ. Clearly you didn't want Seidenberg so why do you care. 1. I'm not going at you, so your offense to it is weird. 2. I care because it's a terrible signing and makes no sense. 3. We are here to chat about the league, so I choose to chat about the league when I'm chatting in the league thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BananaMash Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 so I choose to chat about the league when I'm chatting in the league thread. Quote of the year material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otis Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 1. I'm not going at you, so your offense to it is weird. 2. I care because it's a terrible signing and makes no sense. 3. We are here to chat about the league, so I choose to chat about the league when I'm chatting in the league thread. Not offended just telling you why Seids signed with me, what do you not get about it? I would be honored to answer you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil B From The Pack Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 You guys need to make love Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crom! Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 No goalie should play more than 70 games IMO. I second that - 70 is just right. Don't want to take anything away from teams who have star goalies, but I think we have to make it somewhat realistic and 70 is a solid max That's BS. Just look at Mikka Kiprusoff's career, and Luongo's and Brodeur's. Brodeur has played over 70 games in a season 12 times. In 95-96, 07-08, 09-10 he played 77 games. In 05-06 he played 78. Lehtonen was also re-rated to 91 EN from 96. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.