King Heffy Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Much better than anything else we have. I'm guessing Toews was part of his Mafia group for no longer than a round [otherwise his group would have known who I was & killed me] .. if that was the case, he'd have no reason lying to OTTS & I. That's just a guess, but I did nail Peaches. If you are really the sheriff, could you investigate Aladeen so the town at least has a confirmed TP? Link to comment
LTCanucksfanatic Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Aladeen can you clear up that it is possible for someone to not have a role? KH was skeptical about it. Drouin also came up with description Link to comment
Master 112 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 what? How? I have missed something here how can we not lynch people? AT and KL are supposedly the town's council. They have the ability to veto a lynch. The vote must be unanimous, however, meaning that if there is only one of them still alive, that councilor can single-handedly control the vote. There's a possibility that one of them is corrupted. If the Mafia chooses to go after the one they believe not to be corrupt this round (which would be the smart move as I see it), they have a chance to take the lynch vote away from the town for the rest of the game. Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 If you are really the sheriff, could you investigate Aladeen so the town at least has a confirmed TP? If he is sheriff, AT, gbassi, and myself are all confirmed. Link to comment
Dr.Strangelove Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Ok, I had to.. lol He was the Police Commissioner, OTTS & I were his detectives. The difference was Toews got the final say in who we investigated. I didn't think there was anything else to say.. I mean, you have a PM with LTC, right? which is... a part of the Police Department! Deputy is a part of the PD, but I don't see why he'd care to tell you in full details considering he was a Mafioso. So you lied when you said he was the Commissioner Link to comment
Alchemy Time Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Aladeen can you clear up that it is possible for someone to not have a role? KH was skeptical about it. Drouin also came up with description What was the description? Link to comment
King Heffy Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 If he is sheriff, AT, gbassi, and myself are all confirmed. Yeah, I meant another one. Might as well use the investigation. Link to comment
Drouin Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 You said he was commissioner. Deputy is 2nd in command. Deputy is a part of the PD, but I don't see why he'd care to tell you in full details considering he was a Mafioso. There isn't a deputy in OUR PD. Commissioner Detectives were the only roles. When I said it's a part of the PD, I was talking like irl.. Link to comment
Alchemy Time Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 AT and KL are supposedly the town's council. They have the ability to veto a lynch. The vote must be unanimous, however, meaning that if there is only one of them still alive, that councilor can single-handedly control the vote. There's a possibility that one of them is corrupted. If the Mafia chooses to go after the one they believe not to be corrupt this round (which would be the smart move as I see it), they have a chance to take the lynch vote away from the town for the rest of the game. All three of us (VIC, myself, and KL) are part of the council. Any of the three of us could be corrupted Link to comment
Drouin Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 So you lied when you said he was the Commissioner No, I didn't. When I said it's a part of the PD, I was talking like irl.. He was the Police Commissioner, OTTS & I were his detectives. Link to comment
Go Faulk Yourself Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 AT and KL are supposedly the town's council. They have the ability to veto a lynch. The vote must be unanimous, however, meaning that if there is only one of them still alive, that councilor can single-handedly control the vote. There's a possibility that one of them is corrupted. If the Mafia chooses to go after the one they believe not to be corrupt this round (which would be the smart move as I see it), they have a chance to take the lynch vote away from the town for the rest of the game. VIC is also apart of the council which is the whole reason we are not killing KL17 tonight, as VIC expects to die. Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 There isn't a deputy in OUR PD. Commissioner Detectives were the only roles. When I said it's a part of the PD, I was talking like irl.. Ah. That's kind of a strange thing for Toews to lie about. Also, I doubt MR would give the power to choose investigations to the corrupt policeman. Link to comment
Aladeen Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 AT and KL are supposedly the town's council. They have the ability to veto a lynch. The vote must be unanimous, however, meaning that if there is only one of them still alive, that councilor can single-handedly control the vote. There's a possibility that one of them is corrupted. If the Mafia chooses to go after the one they believe not to be corrupt this round (which would be the smart move as I see it), they have a chance to take the lynch vote away from the town for the rest of the game. i just thought they got double the votes Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 All three of us (VIC, myself, and KL) are part of the council. Any of the three of us could be corrupted The way I read it, it's not possible for the mayor to be corrupted. MR mentioned only councillors. Link to comment
Master 112 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 All three of us (VIC, myself, and KL) are part of the council. Any of the three of us could be corrupted VIC doesn't get a veto vote though, does he? At least that's what I thought his message implied. Link to comment
Alchemy Time Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 There is also a small chance none of us are corrupted. But considering how things have gone I doubt that's true. Link to comment
Alchemy Time Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 i just thought they got double the votes VIC, as mayor, also gets double votes. Link to comment
Drouin Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Ah. That's kind of a strange thing for Toews to lie about. Also, I doubt MR would give the power to choose investigations to the corrupt policeman. He was corrupted.. he probably lied about half the stuff to you. Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 VIC doesn't get a vote though, does he? At least that's what I thought his message implied. I do. I'm part of the council as mayor, but I'm not a councillor. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.