Otis Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 How can I prove it? I can investigate anyone you guys want. Exactly. There's no way to prove it which is why it was a solid excuse to pull out of your ass. Link to comment
Aladeen Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 <3 u Aladeen Awwww to hell with it one more for MR cause I'm feeling the wub now! Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Well apparently you visted Ilduce last night. Is that correct? The night before last Link to comment
NotMyBurroughs Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 I don't know what to say, the odds seem against you. If you are a TP you'll really need to find a way to prove it or I don't see us winning. Link to comment
Caboose Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 At this point its VI's own prerogative to prove his innocence. Could be pretty costly to lynch a tp at this stage, however. Link to comment
Master Radishes Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Could be pretty costly to lynch a tp at this stage, however. We're on the ropes now anyway. Do you have any better leads? Link to comment
Master Radishes Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Regarding VIC's story, it's interesting he only gets an investigation every second round. That seems pretty UP for a Sheriff role. Especially considering he had to start night 2. I have a partner too, and we get an action every night. Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Tell me to investigate anyone and I'll do it.At this point its VI's own prerogative to prove his innocence. Could be pretty costly to lynch a tp at this stage, however. Aladeen isn't a TP. Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Regarding VIC's story, it's interesting he only gets an investigation every second round. That seems pretty UP for a Sheriff role. Especially considering he had to start night 2. I have a partner too, and we get an action every night. It's not a sheriff role. I investigate roles, not affiliations. My guess is that Toews had to give the mafia something after potentially putting three pairs of TP together. Link to comment
Master Radishes Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Tell me to investigate anyone and I'll do it. Investigate whoever you like. Perhaps Big Mike. I'll follow you tonight and see if you actually visit him. Link to comment
Peaches Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Tell me to investigate anyone and I'll do it. How would that prove anything. Link to comment
Master Radishes Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 How would that prove anything. It wouldn't. But me following him would. Although I still think the ??? killer should target VIC tonight. We don't have much time to play games - we need to knock off some Mafia soon or else they'll win. Link to comment
NotMyBurroughs Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 I don't like all of this one bit. Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 How would that prove anything. MR could easily call me out by following me. Link to comment
Master Radishes Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Also on a side note, it's odd that VIC was one of those who argued in thread that ilduce and mau5trap shouldn't be investigated because that would be a waste. So why did he then turn around and investigate one of them? Investigating their role was as much of a waste as investigating their affiliation. Link to comment
Otis Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 At this point its VI's own prerogative to prove his innocence. Could be pretty costly to lynch a tp at this stage, however. We're lynching aladeen, caboose. You'll have to wait until tomorrow to be lynched bud. Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Also on a side note, it's odd that VIC was one of those who argued in thread that ilduce and mau5trap shouldn't be investigated because that would be a waste. So why did he then turn around and investigate one of them? Investigating their role was as much of a waste as investigating their affiliation. I argued that it would be a waste for the sheriff because their role could change and they could give the sheriff up to the mafia and because it's safe to say that they were TP at the time. Investigating their role is different because I figured it'd let me know what'd happen if they died or if one or both of them would spontaneously switch affiliation. That's info that a sheriff investigation doesn't give us. Link to comment
Aladeen Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 We're lynching aladeen, What?!?!?! Why?!?!?! Link to comment
NotMyBurroughs Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 I argued that it would be a waste for the sheriff because their role could change and they could give the sheriff up to the mafia and because it's safe to say that they were TP at the time. Investigating their role is different because I figured it'd let me know what'd happen if they died or if one or both of them would spontaneously switch affiliation. That's info that a sheriff investigation doesn't give us. Any type of proof please Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Any type of proof please Of what? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.