canucks155 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Potentially good Forwards:Shink Horvat JensenJensen Guance ShroederFox and others...Potentially good dmen:Corrado TanevSubban? Stanton?We lack in dmen depth. I say we trade Kes for Poliout and a 1st. Draft Fleury if he's still available and get McKewon if he's avaialbe. Doing so will make the d pairings look like this:Fleury PolioutCorrado TanevSubban? McKewonStanton?Looks pretty good... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Stanton is a rookie and has been good for us. He should get some recognition here =l Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks155 Posted April 9, 2014 Author Share Posted April 9, 2014 Stanton is a rookie and has been good for us. He should get some recognition here =lfixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Stork Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Potentially good Forwards:Shink Horvat JensenJensen Guance ShroederFox and others...Potentially good dmen:Corrado TanevSubban? Stanton?We lack in dmen depth. I say we trade Kes for Poliout and a 1st. Draft Fleury if he's still available and get McKewon if he's avaialbe. Doing so will make the d pairings look like this:Fleury PolioutCorrado TanevSubban? McKewonStanton?Looks pretty good... At this point it's a coin flip since we don't know who the GM and president of this franchise will be Whoever is will have a tough job ahead of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Stork Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Also can you change the poll add Goaltenders and coin flip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Fixed. Fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 That feels like it isn't enough of a return for Kes. I like Pouliot but if we can Bennett as well I'd do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks155 Posted April 9, 2014 Author Share Posted April 9, 2014 Also can you change the poll add Goaltenders and coin flipI don't think there are any good goalie prospects this year. Also, I like Lack and Markstrom. Lack wasn't prepared to be #1 goalie and thats y he struggled. Also, the team sucked too... Markstrom hasn't even played a game but I think he's a good goalie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueberries Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Load up on FWDs. Dcore still has couple of more good years, while not so much for FWDS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks155 Posted April 9, 2014 Author Share Posted April 9, 2014 That feels like it isn't enough of a return for Kes. I like Pouliot but if we can Bennett as well I'd do it.I'm not sure Pit would want to do that tho. I think this would work tho:Van: Bennett, Poliout, 2ndPit: Kesler, Higgins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Load up on FWDs. Dcore still has couple of more good years, while not so much for FWDS. Draft fowards, trade for defencemen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas19 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 No love for Hutton? This draft is really weak for d-men. I say draft a forward. More specifically I say draft Virtanen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 I'm not sure Pit would want to do that tho. I think this would work tho: Van: Bennett, Poliout, 2nd Pit: Kesler, Higgins No Higgins Give them Hansen change 2nd to 1st and you have a deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks155 Posted April 9, 2014 Author Share Posted April 9, 2014 Draft fowards, trade for defencemen?That might not be a bad idea... Yotes, Ducks and Pens have pretty good prospects and a couple of them too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks155 Posted April 9, 2014 Author Share Posted April 9, 2014 No love for Hutton? This draft is really weak for d-men. I say draft a forward. More specifically I say draft Virtanen.I haven't really seen him play. Idk, he might be decent. There are 2 good ones: Fleury & Honka (not w/ top 10 pick) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustABandwagoner Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 No love for Hutton? This draft is really weak for d-men. I say draft a forward. More specifically I say draft Virtanen. Screw Virtanen. Not worth our pick. Maybe the german guy, nylander, Ehlers . If i had to choose Ritchie or Virtanen, I'd go with Ritchie. Im not a fan of virtanen and never will Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks155 Posted April 9, 2014 Author Share Posted April 9, 2014 Screw Virtanen. Not worth our pick. Maybe the german guy, nylander, Ehlers . If i had to choose Ritchie or Virtanen, I'd go with Ritchie. Im not a fan of virtanen and never willI'm not a fan of Ehlers or Nylander... They're too small. Remember what happened against Boston? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBackup Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 I want them to draft the best player available, regardless of position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 So many draft threads. They're spilling over into the proposals forum now! But seriously, how can we say whether to draft a forward or defenceman when we don't even know where we're drafting yet, let alone who gets picked before we go to the podium - not to mention who'll be standing at the podium to make the selection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks155 Posted April 9, 2014 Author Share Posted April 9, 2014 So many draft threads. They're spilling over into the proposals forum now! But seriously, how can we say whether to draft a forward or defenceman when we don't even know where we're drafting yet, let alone who gets picked before we go to the podium - not to mention who'll be standing at the podium to make the selection.We have a pretty good idea of where (6-9 most likely 9)True. But most teams don't take dmen for some reason.Hopefully not Feaster... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.