Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

73 Percent

Members
  • Posts

    19,309
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by 73 Percent

  1. If you lose with those goalie stats I assume you eat corn the long way pal.
  2. You have no right to complain about anything with vas doing what he is right now. 1 goal in his last 8 periods... You should be getting wrecked. I'm going to lose with a .953sv% lol
  3. I hope so. I don't think we'll be able to move garland though.
  4. I guess it depends if there's another bedard next year.
  5. Other teams fans dont have to listen to comparisons of him and whomever Detroit drafts for the next 20 years.
  6. Well he's one of our only RHD prospects so I fully dcpthin to be chopped.
  7. ...yeah... I'm the only one who's noticed his sub par play. Talk about biased. Also this is maybe the 2nd time I've mentioned it so relax sparky.
  8. Zibanejad was a throw in in a trade to acquire Brassard. Brassard for zibanejad and a 2nd. Brassard had the value of a second on his own.
  9. The 4.4 is whatever. His next contract along with the trade compensation is what scares me. Hate to be that guy but I watch a lot of Detroit games because of where I live, this version of hronek is exactly who I thought were were getting. (Not alfs futer HOF dman that he made up in his hallucinogenic ridden brain) Which is why I hated the trade from the get go.
  10. Just taking his time to make the right choice, like schultz. He wouldn't want to choose the wrong team and derail his career for a decade Like schultz lol.
  11. Bruns Puljujarvi Kotkaniemi Chatfield Teravainen Ghostisbear Raanta Skjei Orlov Ullmark Hathaway Bertuzzi Zacha Zibanejad Trochek Motte Halak Vesey Harpur These teams are literally glued together from the scraps of other teams lol.
  12. Yeah I feel he's gone from average to bad since returning from injury. I'll withhold judgment until next year, but this is the player I thought we were getting. I wasn't a fan of this trade at all.
  13. Garland should be taking a long seat right now. He's been awful. Mark him down as another hard to get rid of contract.
  14. Because Livingstone is adefensman... Ellis Josi Ekholm None of which have spent more than 80 games in the minors. Nor will jiricek Nor will peeke Christiansen isn't really a glowing example of an NHL success story yet. My argument still stands. This bake in the AHL to develop system, is a made up dream anymore. It's no longer a typical stepping stone to NHL success.
  15. Find me some examples of these AHL defenseman factories then. I gave you 2 teams btw. 3 if you include the Canucks.
  16. Okay.... In the last 10 years these are the top 4 dmen to spend more than 80 games with the admiral's. Klein Thats it lol. The AHL isn't used as a mandatory stepping stone like it once was. Livingstone would be silly to make his choice based on that.
×
×
  • Create New...