Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

Van-Fla Edler or Hansen wanted

Discussion

  • Please log in to reply
84 replies to this topic

#1 JensenFan2011

JensenFan2011

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,394 posts
  • Joined: 21-September 10

Posted 02 August 2012 - 09:54 AM

Ok so the newest rumor is that Florida either wants elder or hansen +Luongo+ Schroeder in the Luongo trade. I say if Florida wants Edler a start young defensemen then MG should demand that Huberdeau be in the trade rather than Bjustad because if we give up an allstar we should get one in return.

What do you guys think? give up Edler or not? and if we do should MG demand Huberdeau or stick with Bjustad and just try to get other aspects of the trade upgraded?

cause as it stands right now Florida wants

Luongo,Schroeder,Edler/Hansen For Bjustad,Matthias
  • 0

#2 CanucksCupHopes

CanucksCupHopes

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 454 posts
  • Joined: 31-July 12

Posted 02 August 2012 - 09:55 AM

Ok so the newest rumor is that Florida either wants elder or hansen +Luongo+ Schroeder in the Luongo trade. I say if Florida wants Edler a start young defensemen then MG should demand that Huberdeau be in the trade rather than Bjustad because if we give up an allstar we should get one in return.

What do you guys think? give up Edler or not? and if we do should MG demand Huberdeau or stick with Bjustad and just try to get other aspects of the trade upgraded?

cause as it stands right now Florida wants

Luongo,Schroeder,Edler/Hansen For Bjustad,Matthias

Give Hanson away and get another good prospect back
  • 0

#3 Magikal

Magikal

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,592 posts
  • Joined: 09-March 09

Posted 02 August 2012 - 09:56 AM

Edler probably has more value to him than any individual on their team, so no.

Add a world class goalie to the deal and we are getting raped.

Also how is Hansen + Schroedor equal to Edler?
  • 0
Posted Image
Credit to Lahey.

October1st,2013. #HistoryWillBeMade

#4 JensenFan2011

JensenFan2011

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,394 posts
  • Joined: 21-September 10

Posted 02 August 2012 - 09:58 AM

Edler probably has more value to him than any individual on their team, so no.

Add a world class goalie to the deal and we are getting raped.

Also how is Hansen + Schroedor equal to Edler?


didn't say they were = to edler i'm saying what Tallon apparnetly wants he wants either Hansen or Edler added to the deal and they will move on with negotiations from there
  • 0

#5 ALTtimegreat

ALTtimegreat

    Comets Star

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 545 posts
  • Joined: 01-July 12

Posted 02 August 2012 - 10:05 AM

They can have Raymond not hansen unless huberdeau is coming to canucks
  • 0

#6 JensenFan2011

JensenFan2011

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,394 posts
  • Joined: 21-September 10

Posted 02 August 2012 - 10:07 AM

They can have Raymond not hansen unless huberdeau is coming to canucks


Thats what MG offered was Luongo,Schroeder,Raymond for Bjustad,Matthias but Tallon said no to raymond and stated he wants Hansen or Edler
  • 0

#7 smithers joe

smithers joe

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,998 posts
  • Joined: 02-September 09

Posted 02 August 2012 - 10:37 AM

source please?
  • 4

#8 Zoolander

Zoolander

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,186 posts
  • Joined: 29-February 12

Posted 02 August 2012 - 10:45 AM

Hansen +Lu +Schroeder for Bjugstad,Ellerby,Petrovic
  • 0
My 2014 Draft wishlist: 1st rd: Draisaitl, Virtanen, Scherbak. 2nd rd: Brendan Lemieux, Thatcher Demko (Goalie)
Posted Image
Future Canucks top 6:
Shinkaruk-Draisaitl-Scherbak
Virtanen-Horvat-Jensen

#9 NightHawkSniper

NightHawkSniper

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,320 posts
  • Joined: 18-February 10

Posted 02 August 2012 - 10:46 AM

Give them Hansen and watch us snatch him back up on waivers. ;)
  • 0

5577747361_37d631069c_m.jpg
 


#10 Drive-By Body Pierce

Drive-By Body Pierce

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,991 posts
  • Joined: 09-October 08

Posted 02 August 2012 - 10:47 AM

source please?


  • 0

Posted Image


#11 JensenFan2011

JensenFan2011

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,394 posts
  • Joined: 21-September 10

Posted 02 August 2012 - 10:47 AM

source please?


Rumour_Express@InsiderLegit
Source tells me Tallon will not give up Bjugstad unless the deal is great. He also tells me that the counter offer will include Hansen.


Rumour_Express@InsiderLegit
Florida's counter offer is either Luongo, Schroeder, Hansen. Or Luongo, Schroeder, Hansen and a pick

Rumour_Express@InsiderLegit
Source just texted me that Edler could also be involved in the counter offer because Florida wants their defense to be amazing.

Edited by BertuzziFan2010, 02 August 2012 - 10:55 AM.

  • 0

#12 elvis15

elvis15

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,550 posts
  • Joined: 27-February 07

Posted 02 August 2012 - 10:50 AM

Ok so the newest rumor is that Florida either wants elder or hansen +Luongo+ Schroeder in the Luongo trade. I say if Florida wants Edler a start young defensemen then MG should demand that Huberdeau be in the trade rather than Bjustad because if we give up an allstar we should get one in return.

What do you guys think? give up Edler or not? and if we do should MG demand Huberdeau or stick with Bjustad and just try to get other aspects of the trade upgraded?

cause as it stands right now Florida wants

Luongo,Schroeder,Edler/Hansen For Bjustad,Matthias

source please?

Pretty much.

I'm not sure where the OP is getting the rumour from but adding Edler to Luongo in a deal would allow us to get Huberdeau, Bjugstad, Clemmensen, their 1st and maybe even Petrovic. I would seriously have to think about that.

If we were to add in Hansen (or possibly even Burrows if we feel we have too many top 6 forwards with a potential Doan signing and Kassian, Jensen, Rodin, etc coming up) then think Bjugstad, Howden, Clemmensen and their 1st (plus Petrovic if Burrows instead of Hansen).

EDIT: I see the @InsiderLegit post above, but I have little to no reason to believe any rumours coming from there. Regardless our asking price would go up in a major way if they wanted either Hansen or Edler.

Edited by elvis15, 02 August 2012 - 10:55 AM.

  • 2

c3c9e9.pnganimalhousesig.jpg

Tanev is going to EDM. I can put my life savings down on it

 


#13 smithers joe

smithers joe

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,998 posts
  • Joined: 02-September 09

Posted 02 August 2012 - 11:01 AM

i don't believe the rumors....when they come from a creditable source, then maybe.
  • 0

#14 JensenFan2011

JensenFan2011

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,394 posts
  • Joined: 21-September 10

Posted 02 August 2012 - 11:04 AM

i don't believe the rumors....when they come from a creditable source, then maybe.


... he has gotten 4 things right so far way more creditable then other sources
  • 0

#15 smithers joe

smithers joe

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,998 posts
  • Joined: 02-September 09

Posted 02 August 2012 - 11:09 AM

gillis keeps his dealings, close to his vest....when the real insiders hear those stories, i'll believe them...sorry.
  • 1

#16 Jägermeister

Jägermeister

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,589 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 12

Posted 02 August 2012 - 11:10 AM

I would throw in Hansen only if we managed to get either Huberdeau or Gudbranson back.
  • 0
Posted Image

#17 JensenFan2011

JensenFan2011

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,394 posts
  • Joined: 21-September 10

Posted 02 August 2012 - 11:12 AM

I would throw in Hansen only if we managed to get either Huberdeau or Gudbranson back.


yea i think Luongo,Shroeder,Hansen,3rd round pick for Huberdeau,Ellerby,1st round pick would be fair
  • 0

#18 Pineapples

Pineapples

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,714 posts
  • Joined: 15-June 10

Posted 02 August 2012 - 11:29 AM

The only way we should give up Edler or Hansen is if Florida overpays for them. We are trying to win now, so trading key pieces for players that can't help us now is a bad idea.

Come to think of it, I just flat out wouldn't trade them at all. There's nothing FLA can offer to help us now if they take one of them.
  • 2

Pineapple_jumps.gifPineapple_jumps.gif

 


#19 Canucksbiggestfan

Canucksbiggestfan

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,027 posts
  • Joined: 16-September 07

Posted 02 August 2012 - 11:37 AM

If Gillis trades one of Edler or Hansen WITH Luongo in a trade, I will personal go up to the man and give him a roundhouse kick to the face!
  • 4
Posted Image

Posted Image

#20 L'Orange

L'Orange

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,193 posts
  • Joined: 12-November 11

Posted 02 August 2012 - 11:38 AM

Wouldn't do that deal at all.
  • 0
Posted Image

#21 hockeyfan90

hockeyfan90

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,350 posts
  • Joined: 16-January 11

Posted 02 August 2012 - 11:41 AM

MG and the canucks should go talk to Edler and do an inside scheme...Tell Edler, ``Ok we`re going to trade you to Florida with Luongo so we get a good return and then whatever you do don`t sign with them and when you hit UFA next offseason, I will sign you to a 10 year contract, worth 60 million dollar contract...sounds good buddy?" :bigblush:

Edited by hockeyfan90, 02 August 2012 - 11:42 AM.

  • 1

#22 JensenFan2011

JensenFan2011

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,394 posts
  • Joined: 21-September 10

Posted 02 August 2012 - 11:57 AM

MG and the canucks should go talk to Edler and do an inside scheme...Tell Edler, ``Ok we`re going to trade you to Florida with Luongo so we get a good return and then whatever you do don`t sign with them and when you hit UFA next offseason, I will sign you to a 10 year contract, worth 60 million dollar contract...sounds good buddy?" :bigblush:


lol that would be amazing
  • 1

#23 L'Orange

L'Orange

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,193 posts
  • Joined: 12-November 11

Posted 02 August 2012 - 11:58 AM

Losing Edler for Huberdeau would hurt our chances of making a cup run this season.

The only player I would trade Edler for is Shea Weber.

Edler is still a great defenseman, his numbers don't lie. Maybe getting paired with Garrison will be what he needs. That could be a deadly pairing. Big, mobile cannons from the point? Goodness me!
  • 3
Posted Image

#24 elvis15

elvis15

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,550 posts
  • Joined: 27-February 07

Posted 02 August 2012 - 12:02 PM

... he has gotten 4 things right so far way more creditable then other sources

Care to elaborate? @HockeyyInsiderr has gotten things right as well, but that doesn't mean he was the person to break the news or that he hasn't also gotten things terribly wrong.

And I'd prefer credible to creditable.
  • 1

c3c9e9.pnganimalhousesig.jpg

Tanev is going to EDM. I can put my life savings down on it

 


#25 Peaches

Peaches

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,441 posts
  • Joined: 03-February 12

Posted 02 August 2012 - 12:08 PM

no
  • 0

2qn360i.jpg

Feminism will be outlawed. Mostly because it's a backwards idiotic viewpoint that doesn't serve any real progressive purpose.

Credit to -Vintage Canuck-


#26 Joel Heyman

Joel Heyman

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,662 posts
  • Joined: 07-June 11

Posted 02 August 2012 - 12:25 PM

*
POPULAR

Hansen


Posted Image
  • 9

i44w87.jpgryanroyazzopardi+rolled+a+random+image+p
Blue Team


#27 timberz21

timberz21

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,658 posts
  • Joined: 24-July 06

Posted 02 August 2012 - 12:43 PM

i,d be ok with Hansen. I mean, he's a good 3rd liner, but I think he's overrated by CDC and benefits from playing on a strong, deep team. Plus that way Kassian would have real minutes on the 3rd line and could actually develop into something decent, rather than playing on the 4th line, 6 minutes per games.
  • 2

#28 Nucks-4-Life

Nucks-4-Life

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,027 posts
  • Joined: 14-December 06

Posted 02 August 2012 - 12:53 PM

Everyone needs to stop overvaluing Hansen. He is a 20 goal scorer at best. Most likely a 15 goal scorer.

If that's what it takes to get the deal done then do it.

I believe Bjugstad is the real deal, and will be NHL ready in the 2013/2014 season.

Trading Schroeder doesn't make sense, unless MG thinks Kesler will be ready for the start of the season.

Luongo, Schroeder, Hansen, 2nd round pick for Huberdea, Bjugstad, 1st round pick

DO IT MG.

The thing is, if he does the above trade MG will get criticized for not getting an impact player in return. He will need some free agent signings to off-set this. I think the signing of Doan would solidify our 2nd line.

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Booth-Kesler-Doan
Higgins-Lapierre-Kassian
Volpatti-Malhotra-Pinz

Hamhuis-Bieksa
Edler-Garrison
Ballard-Tanev
  • 1

#29 Pears

Pears

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,057 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11

Posted 02 August 2012 - 12:59 PM

Everyone needs to stop overvaluing Hansen. He is a 20 goal scorer at best. Most likely a 15 goal scorer.

If that's what it takes to get the deal done then do it.

I believe Bjugstad is the real deal, and will be NHL ready in the 2013/2014 season.

Trading Schroeder doesn't make sense, unless MG thinks Kesler will be ready for the start of the season.

Luongo, Schroeder, Hansen, 2nd round pick for Huberdea, Bjugstad, 1st round pick

DO IT MG.

The thing is, if he does the above trade MG will get criticized for not getting an impact player in return. He will need some free agent signings to off-set this. I think the signing of Doan would solidify our 2nd line.

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Booth-Kesler-Doan
Higgins-Lapierre-Kassian
Volpatti-Malhotra-Pinz

Hamhuis-Bieksa
Edler-Garrison
Ballard-Tanev

That would be a sick trade. And next year (if we have Doan)

Sedin - Sedin - Burrows
Doan - Kesler - Booth
Huberdeau - Bjugstad - Kassian
Higgins - Lapierre - Volpatti

Filthy forward group.
  • 0

In my eyes drouin is overrated he can score in the qmjhl but did nothing in last two gold medal games that canada lost. Fox will be better pro than him talk to me in five yrs

Gaudreau has one NHL goal whereas all your "prized" prospects have none.

   ryan kesler is going to the chicago blackhawks ...       quote me on it


#30 Drybone

Drybone

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,403 posts
  • Joined: 01-July 12

Posted 02 August 2012 - 01:00 PM

Ok so the newest rumor is that Florida either wants elder or hansen +Luongo+ Schroeder in the Luongo trade. I say if Florida wants Edler a start young defensemen then MG should demand that Huberdeau be in the trade rather than Bjustad because if we give up an allstar we should get one in return.

What do you guys think? give up Edler or not? and if we do should MG demand Huberdeau or stick with Bjustad and just try to get other aspects of the trade upgraded?

cause as it stands right now Florida wants

Luongo,Schroeder,Edler/Hansen For Bjustad,Matthias


I had high hopes when I read the title of the thread.

This deal is sorely disappointing. :sadno:

I hope MG would not consider something like this.
  • 0
Posted Image





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.