Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

Possible playmakers, thoughts on forwarding lines etc.

Proposal

  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 Tom Sestito

Tom Sestito

    Probably Not A Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,443 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 12

Posted 30 January 2013 - 02:02 AM

If Gillis is still in the market for a top six forward, I'd be interested in moving Booth out for a playmaking second liner.

I don't care who or how, or how much his pay is, I think it's the best way to solidify our top six.

I'm a huge Booth fan, but I don't believe that our second line is good enough until we get a playmaking second liner.

I also hope you guys remember the steal we got him for. Marco sturm + Mikael Samuelsson. Not to mention a 3rd round pick in this year's draft, and Steven Reinprecht.

Right now, when we're healthy, our lines will look something like

Daniel - Henrik - Kassian
Booth - Kesler - Burrows
Raymond - Schroeder - Hansen/Higgins
Lapierre - Malhotra - Volpatti

I don't believe that Schroeder's ready to play up on the second line yet, so I'm interested in moving out one of our scorers for a playmaker.

When I look at Washington as a trading partner, the only thing that comes to mind that seems possible is Mike Ribeiro. A deal centering Luongo + for Ribeiro + makes way too much sense to me for it not to happen if we do end up moving him there.

Looking at the Devils, I see Patrik Elias. Yeah, he'll probably be a devil for life but he's so amazing. He knows where to be all the time, he goes to the net and fights, and he passes with ease. He’s a veteran and would add a lot of experience.

Another guy is Dannie Briere. Guy’s always been a stud, and I’d love him on this team.

Also the heavily regarded Stephen Weiss. We’re not going to be able to move David Booth back to Florida, but he’s another good playmaker who’d fit well on the second line. If Luongo does end up going back to Florida, a deal centering these two players makes too much sense not to happen.
It’d be crazy to think of what our team could accomplish with Weiss

Daniel – Henrik – Kassian
Booth- Weiss/Ribeiro/Elias/Briere – Kesler or Kesler - Briere
Raymond – Burrows – Hansen
Lapierre – Malhotra – Higgins

I never thought I’d see Burrows back on the third line, but it makes so much sense if we could get weiss back. I honestly believe this would be our best team offensively that we’ve had in the last 15 years if we could. Weiss and Booth have played together. Also, there’s a “pesk” on all four lines.
Kassian, Kesler, Burrows, and Lapierre can all get under players’ skins.

If we move a top six forward out, then the need for a 3rd line centre stays.
My dream is that Gillis can acquire a player who can skate at the same pace as kesler and burrows, who’s also a playmaker, and a 3rd line centre before the deadline.
If this is out of reach, I doubt that we’ll be able to be successful, and I’d try and get a really high end prospect, or a first round + prospects not of that calibre

I’d do anything right now to get one of the players I’ve mentioned above. Even if that involves giving up one of our top prospects, or a high pick, I think it’s best for the team.

Also, if you're going to propose something, be realistic. No Luongo + raymond + ballard + rodin + 1st for nicklas backstrom bs please.

Am I missing any real possibilities for playmakers?

Edited by TrueStory, 30 January 2013 - 02:06 AM.

  • 0
Posted Image
Thank you VC!

#2 Smashian Kassian

Smashian Kassian

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,437 posts
  • Joined: 10-June 10

Posted 30 January 2013 - 02:09 AM

Let's not trade Booth. Kesler and Burrows have previous chemistry, and if Schroeder continues his play and shows he can play the wing then he is another option.

I just don't see a fit for any trade right now.
  • 0

zackass.png


#3 Kumquats

Kumquats

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,450 posts
  • Joined: 05-July 08

Posted 30 January 2013 - 02:25 AM

I don't care who or how, or how much his pay is,

Spoken like a true fan.
  • 1

#4 Tom Sestito

Tom Sestito

    Probably Not A Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,443 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 12

Posted 30 January 2013 - 02:42 AM

Spoken like a true fan.

Oh, that was confusing lol

I meant I don't care who we get as long as it fits the needs the team has.

How we get that person? All means necessary as long as we're not overpaying.

You've got to give one of the better assets to gain a good one, and if it's going to fill the need we have, why not bring him in?
  • 0
Posted Image
Thank you VC!

#5 kanucks1

kanucks1

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,428 posts
  • Joined: 14-July 12

Posted 30 January 2013 - 08:56 AM

To Philly: Luongo,Booth,2nd 2014.

To Vancouver: Briere, Coturier

We get a playmaker on the 2nd line and a 3rd line checker and scorer.

Lineup when everyones healthy.

Sedin-Sedin-Kassian
Burrows-Briere-Kesler
Raymond-Couturier-Hansen
Higgins-Schroeder-Manny/Lapierre
  • 1
Posted Image


CDC Fantasy League GM Chicago Blackhawks

#6 Tom Sestito

Tom Sestito

    Probably Not A Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,443 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 12

Posted 30 January 2013 - 04:38 PM

It'd be nearly impossible to acquire both Briere and couterier, but one can wish.
  • 0
Posted Image
Thank you VC!

#7 Zoolander

Zoolander

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,190 posts
  • Joined: 29-February 12

Posted 30 January 2013 - 06:48 PM

Briere's cap-hit is HUGE (6million+) and I don't want us to get any older, we already have veterans on this team.

If Luongo is getting traded, I want an NHL-ready/ELC player, and 1st/2nd rd pick
Burrows can fill either 2nd line RW, or 3rd line C when Kesler and Booth get back, and I think whichever one he doesn't fill, we should be looking at getting a young,skilled ELC player to player that position
  • 0
My 2014 Draft wishlist: 1st rd: Draisaitl, Virtanen, Scherbak. 2nd rd: Brendan Lemieux, Thatcher Demko (Goalie)
Posted Image
Future Canucks top 6:
Shinkaruk-Draisaitl-Scherbak
Virtanen-Horvat-Jensen

#8 Tom Sestito

Tom Sestito

    Probably Not A Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,443 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 12

Posted 31 January 2013 - 04:39 PM

I think that's where we could get some leverage, though.

Briere's contract for Lou's, and then we get the upperhand with another player + pick.

You know if Lou's going to Philly, we'll need to take some cap back. If so, why not briere?

I know it's a bit off the charts, but I'd love to have him.
  • 0
Posted Image
Thank you VC!

#9 Pears

Pears

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,757 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11

Posted 31 January 2013 - 04:52 PM

To Philly: Luongo,Booth,2nd 2014.

To Vancouver: Briere, Coturier

We get a playmaker on the 2nd line and a 3rd line checker and scorer.

Lineup when everyones healthy.

Sedin-Sedin-Kassian
Burrows-Briere-Kesler
Raymond-Couturier-Hansen
Higgins-Schroeder-Manny/Lapierre

That is a filthy line up.
  • 0

In my eyes drouin is overrated he can score in the qmjhl but did nothing in last two gold medal games that canada lost. Fox will be better pro than him talk to me in five yrs

Gaudreau has one NHL goal whereas all your "prized" prospects have none.

   ryan kesler is going to the chicago blackhawks ...       quote me on it


#10 Raymond Ballard and a 1st

Raymond Ballard and a 1st

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 152 posts
  • Joined: 30-August 12

Posted 02 February 2013 - 10:07 AM

Trade Raymond Ballard and a 1st for Aaron Rome. GMMG get er' done!
  • 0

#11 Tom Sestito

Tom Sestito

    Probably Not A Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,443 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 12

Posted 02 February 2013 - 03:48 PM

I still think we need to add a playmaker on the second line, so we can move Burrows down to the third line centre spot, or add a 3rd line centre. thought I'd bump this again for more input.

also lol @ Washington, Florida, and Philadelphia being 13, 14, 15 in their conference.

Edited by TrueStory, 02 February 2013 - 03:51 PM.

  • 0
Posted Image
Thank you VC!

#12 Phil_314

Phil_314

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,310 posts
  • Joined: 07-November 09

Posted 09 February 2013 - 10:37 PM

I'm of the "bump Hansen up to the 2nd line" camp.

He's really speedy (so is Kes), he can and is beginning to drive play by lugging the puck up ice and creating off the rush (much like what Ryan likes to do), he's strong at passing on the fly whereas Ryan likes to shoot (though it seems like Jannik's also shooting more now), he provides tons of energy and I.I.R.C. they played together very long ago with Burrows to form a checking line. Since they're familiar with one another why not put them together to form an offensive shutdown trio?

I'm also of the belief that, with their success, Raymond and Schroeder should stick together. Booth, with his speed and shoot-first mentality, needs a play maker who can also create off the rush so why not have those three together (Raymond - Schroeder - Booth)? Those lines would be a solid 2A/ 2B for this team.

Edited by g@m3b0i, 09 February 2013 - 10:38 PM.

  • 0

John 3:16
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.


Jesus LOVES YOU!
2012, meet Matthew 24:36-47!

14 I press on toward the goal to win the prize for which God has called me heavenward in Christ Jesus.


#13 honey badger36

honey badger36

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,579 posts
  • Joined: 20-October 11

Posted 10 February 2013 - 11:31 PM

I concur Hansen or Schredder fit the bill no need to trade Booth.
  • 0





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.