inane Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 Genesis Right, back to my finding logic where there is none. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Colt 45s Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 Right, back to my finding logic where there is none. Religious text with importance to Jews, Christians, and Muslims that says the institution of marriage was founded in the innocence of humankind. Which is the basis of my point that marriage is a religious institution, and government does not need to be involved in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inane Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 Religious text with importance to Jews, Christians, and Muslims that says the institution of marriage was founded in the innocence of humankind. That's a super story. Ignoring the fact that there were unions between people prior to that book, it's still super. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 I still want to know where my damn goats are from my wifes's family! Those buggers owe me damn it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Colt 45s Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 That's a super story. Ignoring the fact that there were unions between people prior to that book, it's still super. So which historical book, mythic story, oral tradition or dominate historical world view makes this assertion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Colt 45s Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 I still want to know where my damn goats are from my wifes's family! Those buggers owe me damn it! They only cost 25 bucks for a breeding pair each overseas. Not too much money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inane Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 So which historical book, mythic story, oral tradition or dominate historical world view makes this assertion? That there was marriage of one type or another prior to sweet baby jesus? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockout Casualty Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 Did you read what I was responding to? Look closely: those were two separate answers about two different questions. You joined them together in your head and that is why you have your underwear up in a wad. It is not my fault you failed reading comprehension--blame government run education if you want. Obviously I did, and to avoid assumptions I asked for clarification. Oh your god, I must be an illiterate product of public schools! Underwear up in a wad? Where did you get that from? You're being pretty passive aggressive. Did you pick that up from Jesus? By the way, is there anything you wouldn't want privatized? Funny thing with this person is that they believe I said government should restrict gay marriage. I think government should get out of the marriage business all together because marriage is a religious rite. I suppose my request for clarification went by you, especially the part where I specifically asked about government not being in the business of marriage. Maybe you can blame the public school for your lack of attention? Oh wait, you probably already do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Colt 45s Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 That there was marriage of one type or another prior to sweet baby jesus? How picturesque! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthecivil Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 That's a super story. Ignoring the fact that there were unions between people prior to that book, it's still super. Well, if we get the government out of marriage then he can be happy and people like Tim Stevenson can marry gay people and then it's just what you, your friends and family think. Of course, the govemnment shouldn't actually acknowlege that anything happened in any of those ceremonies. What happens as a result is the business of the people involved, not anyone else, and certainly not the government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Colt 45s Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 Obviously I did, and to avoid assumptions I asked for clarification. Oh your god, I must be an illiterate product of public schools! Underwear up in a wad? Where did you get that from? You're being pretty passive aggressive. Did you pick that up from Jesus? By the way, is there anything you wouldn't want privatized? I suppose my request for clarification went by you, especially the part where I specifically asked about government not being in the business of marriage. Maybe you can blame the public school for your lack of attention? Oh wait, you probably already do. I actually have a diagnosed learning disability. In spite of it I graduated magna cum laude from a private university. I have then spent the last two years attending Central Michigan University's graduate business school and should graduate in the 3.85-3.9 out of 4.0 range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danthecanucksfan Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 95% Liberal 85% NDP 76% Green Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 Well, if we get the government out of marriage then he can be happy and people like Tim Stevenson can marry gay people and then it's just what you, your friends and family think. Of course, the govemnment shouldn't actually acknowlege that anything happened in any of those ceremonies. What happens as a result is the business of the people involved, not anyone else, and certainly not the government. Problem is there are LOTS of legal reasons why "marriage" does matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dittohead Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 I'm for gay marriage and legalizing pot too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Common sense Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 Also forgot the near pathological selfishness as well. As RTC mentioned, that exists on all points of the spectrum. No way one can solely fault the right when every end is equally to blame for being self-centred. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inane Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 How picturesque! Good job ignoring! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bassi13 Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 91% New Democratic on domestic policy, social, education, economic, immigration, and environmental issues. Click hereto see why 88% Liberal on domestic policy, healthcare, economic, and environmental issues. Click here to see why 67% Bloc Québécois on social, environmental, and economic issues. Click here to see why 64% Green on social, healthcare, and environmental issues. Click here to see why 24% Conservative no major issues. Click here to see why Makes sense, particularly the part where I don't agree with the Conservatives on any major issues. edit: I accidentally clicked no, instead of yes, on banning selective abortions. Hope that didn't skew the results too much, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockout Casualty Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 I actually have a diagnosed learning disability. In spite of it I graduated magna cum laude from a private university. I have then spent the last two years attending Central Michigan University's graduate business school and should graduate in the 3.85-3.9 out of 4.0 range. LOL, would never have guessed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chauncey Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 99% Conservative on domestic policy, economic, healthcare, social, environmental, immigration, foreign policy, and education issues. Click here to see why 31% Liberal no major issues. Click here to see why 17% Bloc Québécois on education issues. Click here to see why 9% New Democratic no major issues. Click here to see why 0% Green Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KoreanHockeyFan Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 75% Liberal 65% BQ (Eww) 64% NDP 62% Green 37% Conservative No surprise here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.