73 Percent

It's because kuzmenko the 27 year old winger fits our window better than Horvat the 27 year old center. Somehow...because JR. Every move this management team makes contradicts the last. Give up a pick for Ethan bear Sign kuzy to 3 yr extension Trade Bo Verbally commit to boeser Next move should be either trading podkolzin or Demko.

Hopefully we can fire the new group and hire him back.

But Horvat was a POS

BB is riding out that contract here. No doubt about it. Then signs for 2.5 in Minny.

53-1 Rangers Kakko gwg

Hmmm. Well that sucks. Maybe I make seperate threads for potential moves?

Updated the OP with a new poll regarding the recent waiver wire additions. As of now our CDC ran team remains the same with the agreement of the Horvat trade. I'll post a side by side of our roster/the current roster Shortly.

Going to this game 4-1 wings Rasmussen

"Learning moment"

Makes sense seeing that we just resigned him. Can't have anything nice on this team.

It's just frustrating to be a fan right now.

Finally a game going exactly how I want.

So then why fire the coach lol

As long as we lose I don't care how we do it. Also what a big difference the coaching change made. Not....

Alf said he's a poor defensive player. Ill disagree with that.

These kinds of moves are the reason I made this thread. Easy for the regular riffraff to come here and say how awful our moves would be, but there's a bunch that didn't go over well with CDC and backfired in real life.

Yeah you just never know what offers would have been drawn up. Easy to say hold out for Schneider but you don't know if that would ever materialize.

I'm not going to dignify this question with an answer.

4-1 isles Horvat Yes

Also would have drafted Tkachuk over OJ...

So I've had this idea for a little bit. I want to see how the roster would look/team would perform if ran by CDC. We'll do this by voting on signings, trades, and the draft. I'm going to try my best to update the roster as we make moves compared to the actual roster. Also We can attempt to adjust standings according to the moves we make (which can also be decided by a poll). here's a general guideline of how I see this going. Moves will be polled for 48 hours after they happen. Draft, signings, and trades will be polled moves. A move will only be made available if it's happened in real life. So if for example Kane is traded for a 1st, we'll poll if we would have pulled the trigger or not. We can't just trade a 5th for Kane and assume the hawks would take it. At the end of the year we'll vote on our place in the standings based on our fictional rosters performance to determine our draft position. Ill do my best to update this as well as can. This may be something kinda neat or it may be a waste of time. But I don't create many topics around here so deal with it. Questions, comments, and concerns are all welcome. without further ado... Let's vote on the horvat move. As discussed earlier we can only vote on what we know.

Hog becomes waiver eligible in 2 games. I think that's why he's slated to ride out the year in Abby. From what I've seen he looked better than pod all year.

You know who else I think thrives under RT? Hoglander.

5-1 NJD Hamilton