the boards Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Yeah, can we somehow get a few more burrows? There could be threads for all of them. Think of the glorious minus totals then! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WadeReddenReborn Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 Burrows at 2 mil is a steal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soundtrack Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 Hey Clutch can you come back and call out Cody Hodgson? Just so he has a breakout season 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tough As Salo Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 This thread is so epic. Somebody get this dude a trophy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Kesler's Snipe Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 -1105 come on guys 495 more -'s then he's at -1500!! move it!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaboomblahstick Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 This thread is so "clutch". I wish I could minus the guy again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Common sense Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 I love this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BM24 Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 (edited) I say everyone, use your positive reps, and keep give positive reps for every post in this thread (only the positive posts about Burrows), that'd be fricking hilarious. I've started it and it led on for quite a bit. I think I'm a super human CDC'er because I had +49 positive reps to use. :lol: I gave positives to negative posts on Burrows, only to see the next I did that, so fix that up CDC EDIT: All of page 1/2 have popular posts, and page 3 is close to done. Page 4/5 has lots of +2 posts. I worked my magic. Edited August 9, 2011 by Dave Bolland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mwandazimu Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 haha..EPIC!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nlife Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 Some people here want to impose a 100 post count on all new members before they can create a new thread. They think it'll cut down on the stupid factor. Me, well I'd suggest that all new members should have to review this thread before they can create new posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Bob Posted August 24, 2011 Share Posted August 24, 2011 Bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Common sense Posted August 24, 2011 Share Posted August 24, 2011 Yup. still loving it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted August 24, 2011 Share Posted August 24, 2011 loooolllz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c-a-n-u-c-k-s Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 Burrows hasn't scored in weeks!!!! oh wait... better ask his wife about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyville88 Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 Bump Well done friend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MANGO Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 <br />I say everyone, use your positive reps, and keep give positive reps for every post in this thread (only the positive posts about Burrows), that'd be fricking hilarious. I've started it and it led on for quite a bit. I think I'm a super <strike>human</strike> CDC'er because I had +49 positive reps to use. <img src='http://content.forum.canucks.com/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> <img src='http://content.forum.canucks.com/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> <img src='http://content.forum.canucks.com/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /><br /><br />I gave positives to negative posts on Burrows, only to see the next I did that, so fix that up CDC <img src='http://content.forum.canucks.com/public/style_emoticons/default/post-5758-1225601204.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /><br /><br />EDIT: All of page 1/2 have popular posts, and page 3 is close to done. Page 4/5 has lots of +2 posts. I worked my magic. <img src='http://content.forum.canucks.com/public/style_emoticons/default/emot-parrot.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /><br /><br /><br /><br /> can't it just fail on it's own merits? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thad Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 When he took that penalty in the Chicago game 7 I didnt want him any more..... Then he glove saves the offside and buries it top shelf in ot to take the series against the team the beat us 2 years in a row Hahahaha ya I really want that "CLUTCH!!" French boy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joecanada777 Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 If burrows is clutch And burrows is burrows And clutch is clutch... Is clutch burrows? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Romo Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 If burrows is clutch And burrows is burrows And clutch is clutch... Is clutch burrows? Yes!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vigneault's Stache Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 (edited) a ton of people on this board have been calling him a third liner but third liners dont score back to back hattys http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOvbvpcpbVo Edited August 25, 2011 by Vigneault's stash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now