Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Our Name Around The League


Trollerblader

Recommended Posts

I read an article this morning in the Sun about the Keith hit on Sedin. If you haven't read it make sure to at least scan, it's quite interesting:

http://www.vancouver...7534/story.html

I'll give you the gist. It's an article featuring a number of commentators from various regions and a snippet of their comments on the Keith-Sedin hit. While the Vancouverite bloggers and columnists are all calling for suspensions (or rather, just stating that they know there will be one), Chicago columnists and have said these awful things about the topic.

Just a sample:

#Canucks having Daniel Sedin see a 'specialist' after that hit by #Blackhawks Duncan Keith?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They just envy us! I mean every one want to be where we are but can't cuz they suck! so who can blame them for saying what they are? I think i would to if thought that it might get the best team in the league off their game.

Having said that what they are saying is quite funny and holds no truth, so why worry? Our tem knows that they have a great team and so does every one else, it is just propoganda, nothing more!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read an article this morning in the Sun about the Keith hit on Sedin. If you haven't read it make sure to at least scan, it's quite interesting:

http://www.vancouver...7534/story.html

I'll give you the gist. It's an article featuring a number of commentators from various regions and a snippet of their comments on the Keith-Sedin hit. While the Vancouverite bloggers and columnists are all calling for suspensions (or rather, just stating that they know there will be one), Chicago columnists and have said these awful things about the topic.

Just a sample:

One guy goes as far as to say that Keith deserves it, but then backtracks to explain that the Canucks are gutless and implies that it's deserved.

I guess that what I'm wondering is why this is thought to be acceptable. If Vancouver columnists wrote this about any player in the league, they would be tarred and feathered. Yet, when Chicago columnists write it, the day goes on and no one gives it a second though. It's easy to attribute it to the nature of American news -- to sensationalize everything and to overload your mind with too many superlatives and exaggerations. But I personally think it's something different.

Never in my life have I read about an American Canuck player --like Kesler for example-- being criticized by American sports media. It's always those French-Canadian scumbags like LaPierre and Burrows, or those fragile Swedes. It seriously makes me wonder whether there's more depth to why the Canucks get hated on in the media outside of Canada. Maybe at the core of this, there's a not-so-well disguised level of bigotry driving it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, Chi-town reporters are really dumb. It would appear that all you need to be a "sports journalist" in Chicago is the ability to read and understand the directions on a shampoo bottle. Americans (in general) are just really angry at the world for not failing as badly as them. Clearly a proper education should be more of a priority than ufc, nickelback and war; especially if the career involves writing or comprehension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Canucks have a sense of fair play... a fast, good hitting team without cheap shot artists. To bad other teams can't say the same. For the last three years or so, the way the NHL has been going, with Inconsistent officiating at the top of the list, all I hope for is all our players to make it through the game unscathed. Sadly it is not to be. I think it is time we all take a stand. Letters to the papers, emails to the NHL...

Remember...'CBS CARES'...The NHL does not"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the dixie chicks were not really destroyed by the media. the media (apart from the ridiculous fox news) is relatively liberal. the people destroying the dixie chicks were the hicks down south (which happened to be a large constituency of their listeners.

that's interesting, i would have imagined it would be the opposite. big cities tend to be cosmopolitan. just walking down the street you see people from every race/walks of life. and there's a lot of foreigners too, there to study, work or just live. so people in big cities are more liberal, more diverse, and more prone to accept differences.

most of the animosity, in my experience has come from the states in the middle...

of course the big cities are the ones with sports teams, so that's where you're going to hear/read things against other teams. but i really don't think teams like the rangers/the flyers/the bruins hate canadian teams more than they hate each other. in NY, you're way more likely to hear an anti-boston or anti-philly thing than anti-toronto or anti-vancouver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...